Effect of operational parameters on anaerobic co-digestion of dairy cattle manure and agricultural residues: A case study for the Kahramanmaraş region in Turkey

Engineering in Life Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 552-559

  Alkaya, Emrah ^a   Erguder, Tuba Hande ^a   Demirer, Göksel N ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Agricultural residues; Anaerobic co digestion; Biogas; Cattle manure; Turkey

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; BIO-METHANATION; BIOGAS COMPOSITION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CATTLE MANURES; DAIRY CATTLE MANURE; DRY MATTERS; EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; METHANE PRODUCTION; OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; REACTOR PERFORMANCE; REDUCTION EFFICIENCY; SEMI-CONTINUOUS REACTOR; TURKEY; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; VOLATILE SOLID; WHEAT STRAWS;

ASTATINE; BIOGAS; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DAIRIES; FATTY ACIDS; MANURES; METHANE; OXYGEN; TEMPERATURE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOGAS; CATTLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DAIRY FARMING; DIGESTION; FATTY ACID; MANURE; METHANE; STRAW; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CASE STUDY; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CLOVER; DAIRY CATTLE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GRASS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; MANURE; NONHUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PH; STRAW; TEMPERATURE; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); WASTE; WHEAT;

BOS; TRIFOLIUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 78650233804     PISSN: 16180240     EISSN: 16182863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201000037     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. G. N. Demirer, S. Chen, Two-phase anaerobic digestion of unscreened dairy manure. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 3542-3549.
2. Directorate of Electrical Power Resources Survey and Development Administration of Turkey, (EİE), Biogas Production Projections of Turkey 2009.
3. D. Kaya, M. Eyidoǧan, V. Çoban, S. Çaǧman et al., 15th International Energy and Environment Fair and Conference, Turkey's Biogas Potential Based on Animal Waste and Economic Analysis, Istanbul, Turkey May 13-15 2009.
4. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources MENR, General energy balance of Turkey in 2007, 2009.
5. S. G. Sommer, N. J. Hutchings, Ammonia emission from field applied manure and its reduction. Eur. J. Agronomy 2001, 15, 1-15.
6. A. A. Araji, Z. O. Abdo, P. Joyce, Efficient use of animal manure on cropland-economic analysis. Biores. Technol. 2001, 79, 179-191.
7. B. Wang, W. Dong, J. Zhang, X. Cao, Experimental study of high rate pond system treating piggery wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 41, 231-238.
8. E. Guerra-Rodriguez, M. Diaz-Ravina, M. Vazquez, Co-composting of chestnut burr nad leaf litter with solid poultry manure. Biores. Technol. 2001, 78, 107-109.
9. R. L. Jr. Knight, V. W. E. Payne, R. E. Jr. Borer, R. A. Clarke, J. H. Pries, Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Ecol. Eng. 2000, 15, 41-55.
10. E. Clarke, A. H. Baldwin, Responses of wetland plants to ammonia and water level. Ecol. Eng. 2002, 18, 257-264.
11. J. J. H. Huang, J. C. H. Shih, The Potential of biological methane generation from chicken manure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 23, 2307-2314.
12. K. V. Lo, P. H. Liao, High-rate anaerobic digestion of screened dairy manure. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1985, 32, 349-358.
13. M. Shyam, A biogas plant for the digestion of fresh undiluted cattle dung. Boiling Point 2001, 47, 33-35.
14. G. Güngör-Demirci, G. N. Demirer, Effect of initial COD concentration, nutrient addition, temperature and microbial acclimation on anaerobic treatability of broiler and cattle manure. Biores. Technol. 2004, 93, 109-117.
15. G. N. Demirer, S. Chen, Effect of retention time and organic loading rate on anaerobic acidification and biogasification of dairy manure. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2004, 79, 1381-1387.
16. M. Hammad, D. Badarneh, K. Tahboub, Evaluating variable organic waste to produce methane. Energy Conservation Manage. 1999, 40, 1463-1470.
17. E. Sanchez, R. Borja, P. Weiland, L. Travieso, A. Martin, Effect of temperature and pH on the kinetics of methane production, organic nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the batch anaerobic digestion process of cattle manure. Bioprocess Eng. 2000, 22, 247-252.
18. G. Bujoczek, J. Oleszkiewicz, R. Sparling, S. Cenkowski, High solid digestion of chicken manure. J. Agric. Eng. 2000, 76, 51-60.
19. C. H. Aubart, S. Fauchiller, Anaerobic digestion poultry wastes-part i biogas production and pollution decrease in terms of retention time and total solids content. Process Biocehm. 1983, 18, 31-34.
20. H. K. Ong, P. F. Greenfield, P. C. Pullammanappallil, An operational strategy for improved biomethanation of cattle-manure slurry in an unmixed, single-stage, digester. Biores. Technol. 2000, 73, 87-89.
21. Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MOEF). Compost Production in Animal Farms, Ankara, Turkey 2005.
22. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st 386 edn., American Public Health Association, Washington DC, USA 2005.
23. M. H. Gerardi, The Microbiology of Anaerobic Digesters, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey 2003.
24. P. L. McCarty, D. P. Smith, Anaerobic wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1986, 20, 1200-1206.
25. P. L. McCarty, R. E. McKinney, Volatile acid toxicity in anaerobic digestion. J. WPCF 1961, 33, 223-232.
26. D. J. Hills, Methane gas production from dairy manure at high solids concentrations. TASAE 1980, 23, 122-126.
27. D. J. Hills, J. J. Mehlschau, Plug flow digestion of dairy manure at different solids concentrations. T ASAE 1984, 27, 889-893.
28. A. Singh, G. Giridhar, M. Madan, P. Vasudevan, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion, Anaerobic digestion: an appropriate process for integrated utilization of biomass from non-conventional sources, Bologna, Italy 1988, 943-946.
29. S. J. Hall, D. L. Hawkes, F. R. Hawkes, A. Thomas, Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of high-solids cattle waste in a packed bed digester. J. Agric Eng. Res. 1985, 32, 153-162.
30. P. N. Dugba, R. Zhang, Treatment of dairy wastewater with two-stage anaerobic sequencing batch reactor systems thermophilic versus mesophilic operations. Biores. Technol. 1999, 68, 225-233.
31. B. K. Ahring, A. A. Ibrahim, Z. Mladenovska, Effect of temperature increase from 55 to 65°C on performance and microbial population dynamics of an anaerobic reactor treating cattle manure. Water Res. 2001, 35, 2446-2452.
32. A. Sung, H. Santha, Performance of temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) system treating dairy cattle wastes. Water Res. 2003, 37, 1628-1636.
33. S. Harikishan, S. Sung, Cattle waste treatment and class a biosolid production using temperature-phased anaerobic digester. Adv. Environ. Res. 2003, 7, 701-706.