The Relational Ontology of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Incorporating Social and Individual Causes

Journal of Human Development and Capabilities

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 213-235

  Smith, Matthew Longshore ^a   Seward, Carolina ^b  

^a INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b The Canadian Department of Justice   (Canada)

Author keywords

Capability approach; Causality; Ontology; Relational society; Social theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650225985     PISSN: 19452829     EISSN: 19452837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19452820902940927     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Agarwal, B., and Panda, P., 2007. ‘Toward freedom from domestic violence: the neglected obvious’. Journal of Human Development, 8(3): 359–388.
2. Alkire, S., 2002a. ‘Dimensions of human development’. World Development, 30(2): 181–205.
3. Alkire, S., 2002b. Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Alkire, S., 2007. ‘Choosing dimensions: the capability approach and multidimensional poverty’, University of Manchester. CPRC Working Paper 88 Chronic Poverty Research Centre
5. Alsop, R., and Heinsohn, N., 2005. ‘Measuring empowerment in practice: structuring analysis and framing indicators’ Washington, DC World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2510 World Bank
6. Archer, M., 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Archer, M., 1996. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, revised edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Archer, M., 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Archer, M., 2002. ‘Realism and the problem of agency’. Journal of Critical Realism (incorporating Alethia), 5(1): 11–20.
10. Bhaskar, R., 1978. A Realist Theory of Science, 2nd edition, The Harvester Press, Hassocks.
11. Bhaskar, R., 1998a. “ ‘Philosophy and scientific realism’ ”. In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, Edited by: Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., and Norrie, A., 16–47. London: Routledge.
12. Bhaskar, R., 1998b. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 3rd edition, London: Routledge.
13. Bunge, M., 2004a. ‘Clarifying some misunderstandings about social systems and their mechanisms’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(3): 371–381.
14. Bunge, M., 2004b. ‘How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2): 182–210.
15. Cartwright, N., 2003. Causation One Word Many Things, London: Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.
16. Coleman, J.S., 1994. Foundation of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: First Harvard University Press.
17. Comim, F., ‘Operationalizing Sen’s capability approach’. paper presented at Justice and Poverty: Examining Sen’s Capability Approach. June5–7, Cambridge, UK.
18. Corbridge, S., 2001. ‘Development as freedom: the spaces of Amartya Sen’. Progress in Development Studies, 2(3): 183–217.
19. Dahl, R.A., 2000. On Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. DiMaggio, P., and Hargittai, E., 2001. “ ‘From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: studying Internet use as penetration increases’ ”. In Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies Working Paper Series #15, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
21. Dupre, J., and Cartwright, N., 1988. ‘Probability and causality: why Hume and indeterminism don’t mix’. Nous, 22(4): 521–536.
22. Elster, J., 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Evans, P., 2002. ‘Collective capabilities, culture and Amartya Sen’s development as freedom’. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2): 54–60.
24. Fay, B., 1994. “ ‘General laws and explaining human behaviour’ ”. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, Edited by: Martin, M., and McIntyre, L.C., 91–110. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
25. Gasper, D., 2002. ‘Is Sen’s capability approach an adequate basis for considering human development?’. Review of Political Economy, 14(4): 435–461.
26. George, A.L., and Bennett, A., 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Goertz, G., 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Gore, C., 1997. ‘Irreducibly social goods and the informational basis of Amartya Sen’s capability approach’. Journal of International Development, 9(2): 235–250.
29. Hedström, P., and Swedberg, R., eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hempel, C., 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Herdt, T.D., and Deneulin, S., 2007. ‘Guest Editors’ introduction’. Journal of Human Development, 8(2): 179–184.
32. Hollis, M., 1994. The Philosophy of Social Science an Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Houston, S., 2001. ‘Beyond social constructionism: critical realism and social work’. British Journal of Social Work, 31(6): 845–861.
34. Ibrahim, S.S., 2006. ‘From individual to collective capabilities: the capability approach as a conceptual framework for self‐help’. Journal of Human Development, 7(3): 397–416.
35. Jones, M., Orlikowski, W., and Munir, K., 2004. “ ‘Structuration theory and information systems: a critical reappraisal’ ”. In Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, Edited by: Mingers, J., and Willcocks, L.P., 297–328. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
36. Kincaid, H., 1996. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research, New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Lawson, T., 2004. A Conception of Ontology, Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics.
38. Little, D., 1998. Microfoundations, Method, and Causation: Essays in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
39. Martins, N., 2006. ‘Capabilities as causal powers’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(5): 671–685.
40. Martins, N., 2007. ‘Ethics, ontology and capabilities’. Review of Political Economy, 19(1): 37–53.
41. Moren, S., and Blom, B., 2003. ‘Explaining human change: on generative mechanisms and social work practice’. Journal of Critical Realism, 2(1): 37–60.
42. Nussbaum, M.C., 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Pawson, R., and Tilley, N., 1997. Realistic Evaluation, London: SAGE Publications.
44. Porpora, D.V., 1998. “ ‘Four Concepts of Social Structure’ ”. In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, Edited by: Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., and Norrie, A., 339–355. London: Routledge.
45. Pratschke, J., 2003. ‘Realistic models? Critical realism and statistical models in the social sciences’. Philosophica, 71(1): 13–38.
46. Qizilbash, M., 2007. ‘Introduction: challenges and debates’. Journal of Human Development, 8(3): 327–335.
47. Richardson, H.S., 2007. ‘The social background of capabilities for freedoms’. Journal of Human Development, 8(3): 389–414.
48. Robeyns, I., 2000. “ ‘An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen’s Capability approach re‐examined’ ”. In Discussion Paper 00.30, Center for Economic Studies, University of Leuven.
49. Robeyns, I., 2005. ‘The capability approach: a theoretical survey’. Journal of Human Development, 6(1): 93–114.
50. Rodrik, D., 2008. “ ‘Second‐best institutions’ ”. In CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6764, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
51. Ron, A., 2002. ‘Regression analysis and the philosophy of social science’. Journal of Critical Realism, 1(1): 119–142.
52. Rose, J., ‘Evaluating the contribution of structuration theory to the information systems discipline’. paper presented at the 6th European Conference on Information Systems,. June4–16, Aix‐en‐Provence, France.
53. Sawyer, R.K., 2004. ‘The mechanisms of emergence’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2): 260–282.
54. Sayer, A., 2000. Realism and Social Science, London: SAGE Publications.
55. Sen, A., 1993. ‘Positional objectivity’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(2): 126–145.
56. Sen, A., 1999. Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Sen, A., 2000. ‘Social exclusion: concept, application, and scrutiny’, Manila: Asian Development Bank. Social Development Papers No. 1
58. Sen, A., 2006. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, New York: W. W. Norton.
59. Smith, M.L., ‘Testable theory development for small‐n studies: critical realism and middle‐range theory’. paper presented at the International Conference on Information Resources Management. May18–20, Niagara Falls.
60. Stewart, F., 2005. ‘Groups and capabilities’. Journal of Human Development, 6(2): 185–204.
61. Stewart, F., and Deneulin, S., 2002. ‘Amartya Sen’s contribution to development thinking’. Studies in Compartive International Development, 37(2): 61–70.
62. Taylor, C., 1994. “ ‘Interpretation and the sciences of man’ ”. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, Edited by: Martin, M., and McIntyre, L. C., 181–211. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
63. Uyan‐Semerci, P., 2007. ‘A relational account of Nussbaum’s list of capabilities’. Journal of Human Development, 8(2): 203–221.
64. Warren, M.E., 2004. “ ‘Trust in democratic institutions’ ”. In Trust: Cement of Democracy, Edited by: Ankersmit, F., and te Velde, H., Vol. 49–69, Leuven: Peeters.