Age related strategic differences in processing irrelevant information

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 487, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 66-69

  Wascher, Edmund ^a   Falkenstein, Michael ^a   Wild Wall, Nele ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aging; EEG; Executive control; Frontal lobe; Inhibition of return; N2

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSULA; NORMAL HUMAN; ORBITAL CORTEX; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650216455     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.075     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aron A.R., Robbins T.W., Poldrack R. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2004, 8:170-177.
2. Bao Y., Zhou J., Fu L. Aging and the time course of inhibition of return in a static environment. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. 2004, 64:403-414.
3. Bertoli S., Probst R. Lack of standard N2 in elderly participants indicates inhibitory processing deficit. Neuroreport 2005, 16:1933-1937.
4. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 108:624-652.
5. Braver T.S., Barch D.M. A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2002, 26:809-817.
6. Castel A.D., Chasteen A.L., Scialfa C.T., Pratt J. Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return. J. Gerontol. 2003, 58B:256-259.
7. Falkenstein M. Inhibition, conflict and the Nogo-N2. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117:1638-1640.
8. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol. Amsterdam 1999, 101:267-291.
9. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. Inhibition-related ERP components: variation with modality, age, and time-on-task. J. Psychophysiol. 2002, 16:167-175.
10. Faust M.E., Balota D.A. Inhibition of return and visuospatial attention in healthy older adults and individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology 1997, 11:13-29.
11. Gazzaley A., Cooney J.W., Rissman J., D'Esposito M. Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1298-1300.
12. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1983, 55:468-484.
13. Hasher L., Zacks R.T. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 22 1988, 193-225. Academic Press, San Diego. G.H. Bower (Ed.).
14. Holmes A.P., Blair R.C., Watson J.D., Ford I. Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996, 16:7-22.
15. Jonkman L.M., Sniedt F.L., Kemner C. Source localization of the Nogo-N2: a developmental study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:1069-1077.
16. Klein R.M. Inhibiton of return. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2000, 4.
17. Lepsien J., Pollmann S. Covert orienting and inhibition of return: an event-related fMRI study. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2002, 14:127-144.
18. Lupiáñez J., Milliken B., Solano C., Weaver B., Tipper S.P. On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 2001, 54A:753-773.
19. McDonald J.J., Ward L.M., Kiehl K.A. An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return. Percept. Psychophys. 1999, 61:1411-1423.
20. Nielson K.A., Langenecker S.A., Garavan H. Differences in the functional neuroanatory of inhibitory control across the adult life span. Psychol. Aging 2002, 17:56-71.
21. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 2002, 24(Suppl. D):5-12.
22. Pastötter B., Hanslmayr S., Bäuml K.-H. Inhibition of return arises from inhibition of response processes: an analysis of oscillatory beta activity. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2008, 20:65-75.
23. Poliakoff E., Coward R.S., Lowe C., O'Boyle D.J. The effect of age on inhibition of return is independent of non-ocular response inhibition. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:387-396.
24. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance, vol. X 1984, 531-556. Erlbaum. H. Bouma, D. Bouwhuis (Eds.).
25. Prime D.J., Ward L.M. Cortical expression of inhibition of return. Brain Res. 2006, 1072:161-174.
26. Raz N., Lindenberger U., Rodrigue K.M., Kennedy K.M., Head D., Williamson A., Dahle C., Gerstorf D., Acker J.D. Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1676-1689.
27. Stuss D.T., Alexander M.P. Executive functions and the frontal lobes: a conceptual view. Psychol. Res. 2000, 63:289-298.
28. Wascher E., Tipper S.P. Revealing effects of non-informative spatial cues: an EEG-study of inhibition of return. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:716-728.
29. Wright R.D., Richard C.M. Location cue validity affects inhibition of return of visual processing. Vis. Res. 2000, 40:2351-2358.