Functional asymmetries in the representation of noise-vocoded speech

NeuroImage

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 2364-2373

  Millman, Rebecca E ^a   Woods, Will P ^b   Quinlan, Philip T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Beamforming; Magnetoencephalography; Speech; Time frequency analyses

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NOISE MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NOISE; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THETA RHYTHM;

EID: 78650211883     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abrams D.A., Nicol T., Zecker S., Kraus N. Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:3958-3965.
2. Ahissar E., Nagarajan S.S., Ahissar M., Protopapas A., Mahncke H., Merzenich M.M. Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:13367-13372.
3. Barnes G.R., Hillebrand A., Fawcett I.P., Singh K.D. Realistic spatial sampling for MEG beamformer images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2004, 23:120-127.
4. Bastiaansen M.C.M., Hagoort P. Oscillatory neuronal dynamics during language comprehension. Progress in Brain Research 2006, 179-196. Elsevier, Amsterdam. C. Neuper, W. Klimesch (Eds.).
5. Bastiaansen M.C.M., van der Linden M., ter Keurs M., Dijkstra T., Hagoort P. Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:530-541.
6. Bastiaansen M.C.M., Magyari L., Hagoort P. Syntactic unification operations are reflected in oscillatory dynamics during on-line sentence comprehension. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:1333-1347.
7. Binder J.R., Frost J.A., Hammeke T.A., Bellgowan P.S.F., Springer J.A., Kaufman J.N., Possing E.T. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and non-speech sounds. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10:512-528.
8. Boemio A., Fromm S., Braun A., Poeppel D. Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:389-395.
9. Buchsbaum B.R., D'Esposito M. The search for the phonological store: from loop to convolution. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:762-778.
10. Crone N.E., Boatman D., Gordon B., Hao L. Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:565-582.
11. Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:3423-3431.
12. Davis M.H., Coleman M.R., Absalom A.R., Rodd J.M., Johnruse I.S., Matta B.F., Owen A.M., Menon D.K. Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:16032-16037.
13. Drullman R., Festen J.M., Plomp R. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994, 95:1053-1064.
14. Drullman R., Festen J.M., Plomp R. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994, 95:2670-2680.
15. Edwards E., Soltani M., Deouell L.Y., Berger M.S., Knight R.T. High gamma activity in response to deviant auditory stimuli recorded directly from human cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:4269-4280.
16. Edwards E., Soltani M., Kim W., Dalal S.S., Nagarajan S.S., Berger M.S., Knight R.T. Comparison of time-frequency responses and the event-related potential to auditory speech stimuli in human cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:377-386.
17. Eisner F., McGettigan C., Faulkner A., Rosen S., Scott S.K. Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:7179-7189.
18. Evans A.C., Collins D.L., Mills S.R., Brown E.D., Kelly R.L. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference: 1993 IEEE Conference Record 1993, 1813-1817. IEEE, San Francisco, CA. L. Klaisner (Ed.).
19. Giraud A.L., Kleinschmidt A., Poeppel D., Lund T.E., Frackowiak R.S., Laufs H. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 2007, 56:1127-1134.
20. Ghitza O., Greenberg S. On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: intelligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and aperiodic insertions of silence. Phonetica 2009, 66:1-14.
21. Gouws A.D., Woods W.P., Millman R.E., Morland A., Green G.G.R. DataViewer3D: an open-source, cross-platform multi-modal neuroimaging data visualisation tool. Front. Neuroinformatics 2009, 3:1-18.
22. Hagoort P. On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:416-423.
23. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8:393-402.
24. Hickok G., Buchsbaum B., Humphries C., Muftuler T. Auditory-motor interaction revealed by fMRI: speech, music, and working memory in area Spt. J. Cogn. Sci. 2003, 15:673-682.
25. Huang M.-X., Shih J.J., Lee R.R., Harrington D.L., Thoma R.J., Weisend M.P., Hanlon F., Paulson K.M., Li T., Martin K., Miller G.A., Canive J.M. Commonalities and differences among vectorized beamformers in electromagnetic source imaging. Brain Topogr. 2004, 16:139-158.
26. Kozinska D., Carducci F., Nowinski K. Automatic alignment of EEG/MEG and MRI data sets. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112:1553-1561.
27. Lancaster J.L., Tordesillas-Gutiérrez D., Martinez M., Salinas F., Evans A., Zilles K., Mazziotta J.C., Fox P.T. Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analysed using the ICBM-152 brain template. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2007, 28:1194-1205.
28. Luo H., Poeppel D. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron 2007, 54:1001-1010.
29. Leff A.P., Schofield T.M., Stephan K.E., Crinion J.T., Friston K.J., Price C.J. The cortical dynamics of intelligible speech. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:13209-13215.
30. Leff A.P., Schofield T., Crinion J., Seghier M., Grogan A., Green D., Price C. The left superior temporal gyrus is a shared substrate for auditory short-term memory and speech comprehension: evidence from 210 patients with stroke. Brain 2009, 132:3401-3410.
31. Millman R.E., Prendergast G., Kitterick P.T., Woods W.P., Green G.G.R. Spatiotemporal reconstruction of the auditory steady-state response to frequency modulation using magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage 2010, 49:745-758.
32. Mummery C.J., Ashburner J., Scott S.K., Wise R.J.S. Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in six normal and two aphasic subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 106:449-457.
33. Nichols T.E., Holmes A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 15:1-25.
34. Nourski K.V., Reale R.A., Oya H., Kawasaki H., Kovach C.K., Chen H., Howard M.A., Brugge J.F. Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:15564-15574.
35. Obleser J., Eisner F. Pre-lexical abstraction of speech in the auditory cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:14-19.
36. Obleser J., Wise R.J., Dresner M.A., Scott S.K. Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2283-2289.
37. Obleser J., Eisner F., Kotz S.A. Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:8116-8124.
38. Pantev C. Evoked and induced gamma-band activity of the human cortex. Brain Topogr. 1995, 7:321-330.
39. Peelle J.E., Eason R.J., Schmitter S., Schwarzbauer C., Davis M.H. Evaluating an acoustically quiet EPI sequence for use in fMRI studies of speech and auditory processing. Neuroimage 2010, 52:1410-1419.
40. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time'. Speech Commun. 2003, 41:245-255.
41. Rauschecker J.P., Scott S.K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:718-724.
42. Rodd J.M., Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. The neural mechanisms speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1261-1269.
43. Rosen S. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1992, 336:367-373.
44. Sabri M., Binder J.R., Desai R., Medler D.A., Leitl M.D., Liebenthal E. Attentional and linguistic interactions in speech perception. Neuroimage 2008, 39:1444-1456.
45. Scott S.K., Blank C.C., Rosen S., Wise R.J.S. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000, 123:2400-2406.
46. Scott S.K., Rosem S., Lang H., Wise R.J. Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded speech - a positron emission tomography study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120:1075-1083.
47. Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995, 270:303-304.
48. Smith S.M., Nichols T.E. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009, 44:83-98.
49. Smith Z.M., Delgutte B., Oxenham A.J. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 2002, 416:87-90.
50. Stockwell R.G., Mansinha L., Lowe R.P. Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform. IEEE Trans. Signal. Proc. 1996, 44:998-1001.
51. Tallon-Baudry C., Bertrand O. Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999, 3:151-162.
52. Van Veen B.D., van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., Suzuki A. Localisation of brain electrical activity via a linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1997, 44:867-880.
53. Zatorre R.J., Evans A.C., Meyer E., Gjedde A. Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science 1992, 256:846-849.
54. Zatorre R.J., Belin P., Penhune V.B. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6:37-46.