Scent marking in wild banded mongooses: 1. Sex-specific scents and overmarking

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 31-42

  Jordan, Neil R ^a   Manser, Marta B ^b   Mwanguhya, Francis ^a,c,e   Kyabulima, Solomon ^a,c,e   Rüedi, Peter ^b   Cant, Michael A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c QENP   (Uganda)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^e Queen Elizabeth National Park   (Uganda)

Author keywords

Banded mongoose; Communication; Competition; Mungos mungo; Olfaction; Overmark; Scent mark; Sex difference; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

MAMMAL; OLFACTORY CUE; SCENT MARKING; SEX DETERMINATION; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION;

CARNIVORA; MAMMALIA; MUNGOS MUNGO;

EID: 78650199768     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Altmann J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 1974, 69:227-267.
2. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
3. Barja I., de Miguel F.J., Barcena F. The importance of crossroads in faecal marking behaviour of the wolves (Canis lupus). Naturwissenschaften 2004, 91:489-492.
4. Bell, M. B. V. 2006. Communication, cooperation and conflict in banded mongooses. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
5. Brashares J.S., Arcese P. Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: I. The maintenance of borders between male oribi. Animal Behaviour 1999, 57:1-10.
6. Brashares J.S., Arcese P. Scent marking in a territorial African antelope: II. The economics of marking with faeces. Animal Behaviour 1999, 57:11-17.
7. Brotherton, P. N. M. 1994. The evolution of monogamy in the dik-dik. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University.
8. Buesching C.D., Macdonald D.W. Variations in scent-marking behaviour of European badgers Meles meles in the vicinity of their setts. Acta Theriologica 2004, 49:235-246.
9. Buesching C.D., Waterhouse J.S., Macdonald D.W. Gas-chromatographic analyses of the subcaudal gland secretion of the European badger (Meles meles). Part I. Chemical differences related to individual parameters. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2002, 28:41-56.
10. Buesching C.D., Newman C., Macdonald D.W. Variations in colour and volume of the subcaudal gland secretion of badgers (Meles meles) in relation to sex, season and individual-specific parameters. Mammalian Biology 2002, 67:147-156.
11. Buesching C.D., Waterhouse J.S., Macdonald D.W. Gas-chromatographic analyses of the subcaudal gland secretion of the European badger (Meles meles). Part II. Time-related variation in the individual-specific composition. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2002, 28:57-70.
12. Cant M.A. Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses. Animal Behaviour 2000, 59:147-158.
13. Cant M.A., Otali E., Mwanguhya F. Fighting and mating between groups in a cooperatively breeding mammal, the banded mongoose. Ethology 2002, 108:541-555.
14. Cant M.A., Hodge S.J., Bell M.B.V., Gilchrist J.S., Nichols H.J. Reproductive control via eviction (but not the threat of eviction) in banded mongooses. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2010, 277:2219-2226.
15. Clapperton B.K., Mino E.O., Crump D.R. An olfactory recognition system in the ferret Mustela furo L. (Carnivora: Mustelidae). Animal Behaviour 1988, 36:541-554.
16. Cloe A.L., Woodley S.K., Waters P., Zhou H., Baum M.J. Contribution of anal scent gland and urinary odorants to mate recognition in the ferret. Physiology and Behavior 2004, 82:871-875.
17. Coquelin A. Urine-marking by female mice throughout their reproductive cycle. Hormones and Behavior 1992, 26:255-271.
18. Davies J.M., Lachno D.R., Roper T.J. The anal gland secretion of the European badger (Meles meles) and its role in social communication. Journal of Zoology 1988, 216:455-463.
19. Drea C.M., Sacha N., Vignierib H., Kimb S., Weldelea M.L., Glickman S.E. Responses to olfactory stimuli in spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) II. Discrimination of conspecific scent. Journal of Comparative Psychology 2002, 116:342-349.
20. Ferkin M.H. Meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus, Arvicolidae) over-mark and adjacent-mark the scent marks of same-sex conspecifics. Ethology 1999, 105:825-839.
21. Ferkin M.H. Scent over-marking and adjacent-marking as competitive tactics during chemical communication in voles. Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Vol. 8 1999, 239-246. Plenum, New York. R.E. Johnston, D. Muller-Schwarze, P.W. Sorenson (Eds.).
22. Ferkin M.H. Patterns of sexually distinct scents in Microtus spp. Canadian Journal of Zoology 2001, 79:1621-1625.
23. Ferkin M.H., Johnston R.E. Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, use multiple sources of scent for sex recognition. Animal Behaviour 1995, 49:37-44.
24. Ferkin M.H., Pierce A.A. Perspectives on over-marking: is it good to be on top?. Journal of Ethology 2007, 25:107-116.
25. Ferkin M.H., Leonard S.T., Bartos K., Schmick M.K. Meadow voles and prairie voles differ in the length of time they prefer the top-scent donor of an over-mark. Ethology 2001, 107:1099-1114.
26. Ferkin M.H., Lee D.N., Leonard S.T. The reproductive state of female voles affects their scent marking behaviour and the responses of male conspecifics to such marks. Ethology 2004, 110:257-272.
27. Ferkin M.H., Pierce A.A., Sealand R.O., del Barco-Trillo J. Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, can distinguish more over-marks from fewer over-marks. Animal Cognition 2005, 8:182-189.
28. Fischer R.B., Brown P.S. Vaginal secretions increase the likelihood of intermale aggression in Syrian hamsters. Physiology and Behavior 1993, 54:213-214.
29. Fisher H.S., Swaisgood R.R., Fitch-Snyder H. Counter-marking by male pygmy lorises (Nycticebus pygmaeus): do females use odor cues to select mates with high competitive ability?. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2003, 53:425-426.
30. Gilchrist J.S. Pup escorting in the communal breeding banded mongoose: behavior, benefits, and maintenance. Behavioral Ecology 2004, 15:952-960.
31. Golabek K.A., Jordan N.R., Clutton-Brock T.H. Radiocollars do not affect the survival or foraging behaviour of wild meerkats. Journal of Zoology 2008, 274:248-253.
32. Goldizen A.W. Tamarins and marmosets: communal care of offspring. Primate Societies 1986, 34-43. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. B.B. Smuts, D.L. Cheney, R.M. Seyfarth, R.W. Wrangham, T.T. Struhsaker (Eds.).
33. Goodrich B.S., Mykytowycz R. Individual and sex differences in the chemical composition of the pheromone like substances from the skin gland of the rabbit. Journal of Mammalogy 1972, 53:540-548.
34. Gorman M.L. Sweaty mongooses and other smelly carnivores. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 1980, 45:87-105.
35. Gorman M.L., Mills M.G.L. Scent marking strategies in hyaenas (Mammalia). Journal of Zoology 1984, 202:535-547.
36. Hefetz A., Ben-Yaacov R., Yom-Tov Y. Sex specificity in the anal gland secretion of the Egyptian mongoose Herpestes ichneumon. Journal of Zoology 1984, 103:205-209.
37. Heymann E.W. Scent marking, paternal care, and sexual selection in callitrichines. Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Primates: New Perspectives and Directions. Special Topics in Primatology 3 2003, 305-325. American Society of Primatologists, Norman, Oklahoma. C.B. Jones (Ed.).
38. Hodge, S. J. 2003. The evolution of cooperation in the communal breeding banded mongoose. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
39. Hurst J.L. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. II. Communication between females. Animal Behaviour 1990, 40:223-232.
40. Johnston R.E. The causation of two scent-marking behaviour patterns in female hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Animal Behaviour 1977, 25:317-328.
41. Johnston R.E., Bhorade A. Perception of over-marks: novel mechanisms for determining which individual's mark is on top. Journal of Comparative Psychology 1998, 112:230-243.
42. Johnston R.E., Chaing G., Tung C. The information in scent over-marks of golden hamsters. Animal Behaviour 1994, 48:323-330.
43. Johnston R.E., Munver R., Tung C. Scent counter marks: selective memory for the top scent by golden hamsters. Animal Behaviour 1995, 49:1435-1442.
44. Johnston R.E., Sorokin E.S., Ferkin M.H. Female voles discriminate males' overmarks and prefer top-scent males. Animal Behaviour 1997, 54:679-690.
45. Jordan N.R. Scent-marking investment is determined by sex and breeding status in wild meerkats. Animal Behaviour 2007, 74:531-540.
46. Jordan N.R., Mwanguhya F., Kyabulima S., Rüedi P., Cant M.A. Scent marking within and between groups of wild banded mongooses. Journal of Zoology 2010, 280:72-83.
47. Kaiser H.F. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960, 20:141-151.
48. Klingel H. Soziale Organisation und Verhalten freilebender Steppenzebras (Equus quagga). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 1967, 24:580-624.
49. Kruuk H. Spatial organisation and territorial behaviour of the European badger Meles meles. Journal of Zoology 1978, 184:1-19.
50. Linklater W.L. Adaptive explanation in socio-ecology: lessons from the Equidae. Biological Reviews 2000, 75:1-20.
51. Mills M.G.L., Gorman M.L. The scent-marking behaviour of the spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta, in the Southern Kalahari. Journal of Zoology 1987, 212:483-497.
52. Moodie J.D., Byers J.A. The function of scent marking by males on female urine in pronghorns. Journal of Mammalogy 1989, 70:812-814.
53. Müller C.A., Manser M.B. 'Nasty neighbors' rather than 'dear enemies' in a social carnivore. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2007, 274:959-965.
54. Müller C.A., Manser M.B. Scent-marking and intrasexual competition in a cooperative carnivore with low reproductive skew. Ethology 2008, 114:174-185.
55. Müller C.A., Manser M.B. Mutual recognition of pups and providers in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose. Animal Behaviour 2008, 75:1683-1692.
56. Mundry R., Sommer C. Discriminant function analysis with nonindependent data: consequences and an alternative. Animal Behaviour 2007, 74:965-976.
57. Peters R.P., Mech L.D. Scent-marking in wolves. American Scientist 1975, 63:628-637.
58. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org.
59. Rich T.J., Hurst J.L. Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of mates. Animal Behaviour 1998, 56:727-735.
60. Rich T.J., Hurst J.L. The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates. Animal Behaviour 1999, 58:1027-1037.
61. Rood J.P. Population dynamics and food habits of the banded mongoose. East African Wildlife Journal 1975, 13:89-111.
62. Roper T.J., Shepherdson D.J., Davies J.M. Scent marking with faeces and anal secretion in the European badger (Meles meles): seasonal and spatial characteristics of latrine use in relation to territoriality. Behaviour 1986, 97:94-117.
63. Roper T.J., Conradt L., Butler J., Christian S.E., Ostler J., Schmid T.K. Territorial marking with faeces in badgers (Meles meles): a comparison of boundary and hinterland latrine use. Behaviour 1993, 127:289-307.
64. Rosell F., Bergan F., Parker H. Scent-marking in the Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber) as a means of territory defense. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1998, 24:207-219.
65. Rothman R.J., Mech L.D. Scent-marking in lone wolves and newly formed pairs. Animal Behaviour 1979, 27:750-760.
66. Rozenfeld F.M., Denoël A. Chemical signals involved in spacing behavior of breeding female bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus Schreber 1780, Microtidae, Rodentia). Journal of Chemical Ecology 1994, 20:803-813.
67. Spinage C.A. A Territorial Antelope: the Uganda Waterbuck 1982, Academic Press, London.
68. Stewart P.D., Macdonald D.W., Newman C., Tattersall F.H. Behavioural mechanisms of information transmission and reception by badgers, Meles meles, at latrines. Animal Behaviour 2002, 63:999-1007.
69. Swaisgood R.R., Lindburg D.G., Zhang H. Discrimination of oestrous status in giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) via chemical cues in urine. Journal of Zoology 2002, 257:381-386.
70. Thomas S.A., Wolff J.O. Scent marking in voles: a reassessment of over marking, counter marking, and self-advertisement. Ethology 2002, 108:51-62.
71. Tibbetts E.A., Dale J. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2007, 22:529-537.
72. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871-1971 1972, 136-179. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago. B. Campbell (Ed.).
73. Wilcox R.M., Johnston R.E. Scent-counter marks: specialized mechanisms of perception and response to individual odors in golden hamsters. Journal of Comparative Psychology 1995, 109:34-356.