Grading diabetic retinopathy severity from compressed digital retinal images compared with uncompressed images and film

Retina

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1651-1661

  Li, Helen K ^a,b   Florez Arango, Jose F ^b,c   Hubbard, Larry D ^d   Esquivel, Adol ^e   Danis, Ronald P ^d   Krupinski, Elizabeth A ^f  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA   (Colombia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIGITAL IMAGING; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE INJURY; FEMALE; FILM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RETINA IMAGE; RETINOPATHY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATA COMPRESSION; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 78650172547     PISSN: 0275004X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e3790b     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. CCITT T.81. Information technology\digital compression and coding of continuous-tone still images\requirements and guidelines. Available at: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/JPEG/itu-t81.pdf. Accessed November14, 2009.
2. Tzannes A, Ebrahimi T. JPEG 2000 for medical imaging applications. Available at: http://www.jpeg.org/apps/medical. html. Accessed December 6, 2009.
3. Marcellin MW, Bilgin A, Gormish MJ, Boliek MJ. An overview of JPEG-2000. New York: IEEE, In: Proceedings of IEEE Data Compression Conference 2000. 2000; 523-541.
4. Koff DA, Shulman H. An overview of digital compression of medical images: can we use lossy image compression in radiology? Can Assoc Radiol J 2006;57:211-217.
5. Krupinski E, Burdick A, Pak H, et al. American telemedicine association's practice guidelines for teledermatology. Telemed J E Health 2008;14:289-302.
6. Atan D, Foy C, Scanlon PH. Reply to "Evaluation of the effect of JPEG and JPEG 2000 image compression on the detection of diabetic retinopathy." Eye (Lond) 2008;22:471; author reply 3.
7. Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, et al. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2001;108: 572-585.
8. Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Weis E, Ting A, Hinz BJ, Greve MD. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2007; 114:1748-1754.
9. Schiffman RM, Jacobsen G, Nussbaum JJ, et al. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2005;36:46-56
10. Ophthalmic photography image SOP classes. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Supplement 91. Available at: ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup91-ft2.pdf. Accessed December 8, 2009
11. JPEG 2000 transfer syntaxes. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Supplement 61. Available at: ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/ dicom/final/sup61-ft.pdf. Accessed December 8, 2009.
12. Cavallerano J, Lawrence MG, Zimmer-Galler I, et al. Tele-health practice recommendations for diabetic retinopathy. Telemed J E Health 2004;10:469-482.
13. Krupinski E, Johnson J, Roehrig H, Lubin J. Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor. Acad Radiol 2003;10:161-166. (Pubitemid 36150969)
14. Krupinski EA, Johnson J, Roehrig H, Nafziger J, Fan J, Lubin J. Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:258-263. (Pubitemid 40249070)
15. Krupinski EA, Lubin J, Roehrig H, Johnson J, Nafziger J. Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of veiling glare. Acad Radiol 2006;13:289-295.
16. Krupinski EA, Johnson J, Roehrig H, Nafziger J, Lubin J. On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions. Acad Radiol 2005;12:957-964
17. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. DRCRnet Manual of Operations. Tampa, FL: Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc.
18. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. DRCRnet Manual of Operations. Tampa, FL: Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc. http://drcrnet.jaeb.org/ViewPage.aspx? PageName=Investig-Info.
19. Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Neider MW, et al. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3269-3282.
20. Jackson WB, Said MR, Jared DA, Larimer JO, Gille JL, Lubin J. Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human-observer performance. In: Proceedings of SPIE: Medical Imaging 1997. International Society for Optical Engineering. Bellingham, WA: SPIE. Vol. 3036: Medical Imaging 1997, pp. 64-73.
21. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs\an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98:786-806.
22. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98:823-833.
23. Yassur Y, Siegel R, Karp M, Laron Z, Topper E. The detection of early microangiopathy in juvenile diabetics by monochromatic light photography. Pediatr Adol Endocrinol 1980;9:181-184.
24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
25. Uebersax JS. User guide for the MH program (vers. 1.2). Statistical methods for rater agreement website. 2006. Available at: http://ourworld. compuserve.com/homepages/jsuebersax/mh.htm. Accessed May 1, 2009.
26. Conrath J, Erginay A, Giorgi R, et al. Evaluation of the effect of JPEG and JPEG2000 image compression on the detection of diabetic retinopathy. Eye 2007;21:487-493.
27. Baker CF, Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, et al. JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol 2004;39: 746-754.
28. Basu A, Kamal AD, Illahi W, Khan M, Stavrou P, Ryder RE. Is digital image compression acceptable within diabetic retinop-athy screening? Diabet Med 2003;20:766-771.
29. Newsom RS, Clover A, Costen MT, et al. Effect of digital image compression on screening for diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:799-802.
30. Bélair ML, Fansi AK, Descovich D, Leblanc AR, Harasymowycz P. The effect of compression on clinical diagnosis of glaucoma based on non-analyzed confocal scanning laser ophthalmos-copy images. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2005;36: 323-326.
31. Eikelboom RH, Yogesan K, Barry CJ, et al. Methods and limits of digital image compression of retinal images for tele-medicine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1916-1924.
32. Lee MS, Shin DS, Berger JW. Grading, image analysis, and stereopsis of digitally compressed fundus images. Retina 2000; 20:275-281.
33. Peterson RC, Wolffsohn JS. The effect of digital image resolution and compression on anterior eye imaging. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:828-830.
34. Zeimer R, Zou S, Meeder T, Quinn K, Vitale S. A fundus camera dedicated to the screening of diabetic retinopathy in the primary-care physician's office. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43: 1581-1587.
35. Johnson JP, Krupinski EA, Nafziger JS, Yan M, Roehrig H. Visually lossless compression of breast biopsy virtual slides for telepathology. In: Proceedings of SPIE: Medical Imaging 2009. Bellingham, WA: SPIE. Vol. 7263: Medical Imaging 2009. http://spie.org/app/sitesearch/index.cfm?searchtext= visually%20lossless%20compression%20of%20brest§ion
36. Mathematical model approximates human visual perception of compressed images. Available at: http://www.diagnosticima-ging.com/imaging-trends-advances/ practical-ct/archive/arti-cle/113619/1175092. Accessed November 14, 2009.
37. Lubin J. A visual system discrimination model for imaging sytstem design and evaluation. In: Peli E, ed. Visual Models for Target Detection and Recognition. New York, NY: World Scientific; 1995:245-283.
38. Vujosevic S, Benetti E, Massignan F, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:111-118.
39. Gomez-Ulla F, Fernandez MI, Gonzalez F, et al. Digital retinal images and teleophthalmology for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1384-1389.
40. Stellingwerf C, Hardus PL, Hooymans JM. Assessing diabetic retinopathy using two-field digital photography and the influence of JPEG-compression. Doc Ophthalmol 2004;108: 203-209.
41. Leese GP, Ellingford A, Morris AD, Ellis JD, Cunningham S. Screening using compressed digital retinal images successfully identifies retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2003;26:247.
42. Li HK, Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Esquivel A, Florez-Arango JF, Ferrier N, Krupinski EA. Digital vs. Film Fundus Photography for Research Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 May 19. [Epub ahead of print].