Conjoint analysis of consumer preference for bluefin tuna

Fisheries Science

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1023-1028

  Ariji, Masahiko ^a  

^a KINKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bluefin tuna; Conjoint analysis; Full cycle farming; Marketing; WTP

Indexed keywords

SCOMBRIDAE; THUNNUS ORIENTALIS; THUNNUS THYNNUS;

EID: 78650171968     PISSN: 09199268     EISSN: 14442906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12562-010-0297-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kumai H et al (2010) Fullcycle farming of bluefin tuna. Seizando, Tokyo.
2. Ono S (2008) The problem and view of tuna farming: logistics and economics of cultivated tunas-proximity based on the food system theory, chap 9. Kinki University 21st Century COE Program, Nara, pp 209-223.
3. Bureau of Statistics, Office of the Prime Minister (2009) Annual report on the family income and expenditure survey. Japan Statistical Association, Tokyo.
4. Kitano S (2008) Consumer trends: logistics and economics of cultivated tunas-proximity based on the food system theory, chap 7. Kinki University 21st Century COE Program, Nara, pp 133-168.
5. Torii T (2008) Conveyor-belt sushi: logistics and economics of cultivated tunas-proximity based on the food system theory, chap 5. Kinki University 21st Century COE Program, Nara, pp 89-114.
6. Oishi T et al (2010) Estimates of the potential demand of Japanese consumers for eco-labeled seafood products. Jpn Soc Fish Sci 76(1): 26-33.
7. Morita T, Managi S (2010) Eco-labeling of fish and fishery products in Japan: analysis of a web survey. Shigen keizaigaku heno shoutai, Minerva-Shobo, pp 173-204.
8. Yoshida K (2003) Verification of sequential effect created by environment risk information using a selection test format conjoint analysis. J Assoc Rural Plann 21: 303-312.
9. Ono E (2002) Practical usage of environmental economic evaluations. Keisoshobo, Tokyo.
10. Takeshita H, Asano K (2004) Economic value of trust affiliation labels on foods: economic evaluation of food safety-proximity using presentation of selection method. J Assoc Rural Plann 22: 130-145.
11. Ariji M (2007) Quantitative analysis of fisheries economics. Seizando, Tokyo.
12. Bjørner TB, Hansen LG, Russell CR (2004) Environmental labeling and consumers' choice-an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic swan. Assoc Environ Resourc Econ 47: 411-434.
13. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH (1998) Applied choice analysis-a primer. Cambridge University Press, London.
14. Holland D, Wessells CR (1998) Predicting consumer preferences for fresh salmon: the influence of safety inspection and production method attributes. Northeastern Agric Resourc Econ Assoc 27: 1-24.