Mapping the extent of disease by multislice computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node evaluation in stage i and II cervical carcinoma

Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 267-271

  Rajaram, S ^a   Sharma, H ^a   Bhargava, S ^a   Tripathi, R ^b   Goel, N ^a   Mehta, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND ALLIED SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Carcinoma cervix; CT; FIGO staging; MRI; sentinel node

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; DISULFINE BLUE;

ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGICAL RADIOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INDIA; INJECTION; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM STAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 78650167697     PISSN: 09731482     EISSN: 19984138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.73342     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Subak LL. Cervical carcinoma: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:43-50.
2. Hricak H, Yu KK. Radiology in Invasive cervical cancer. AJR 1996;167:1101-8.
3. Vidaurreta J, Bermudez A, di Paola G, Sardi J. Laparoscopic staging in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: A new possible philosophy? Gynecol Obstet 1999;78:366-71.
4. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, Chang YCF, Winkler ML, Stern JL. Invasive cervical carcinoma: Comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 1988;166:623-31.
5. Hricak H, Powell CB, Yu KK, Washington E, Subak LL, Stern JL, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: Role of MR imaging in pretreatment workup-Cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis. Radiology 1996;198:403-9.
6. Morton D, Thompson JF, Essner R, Elashoff R, Stern SL, Nieweg OE, et al. validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymph mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early stage melanoma. Ann Surg 1999;4:453-65.
7. McMasters KM, Wong SL, Chao C, Woo C, Tuttle TM, Noyes RD, et al. Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: A model for implementation of new surgical techniques. Ann Surgery 2001;3:292-300.
8. Levenback C, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, Morris M, Malpica A, Ross M. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping for vulvar cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:163-7.
9. Liptay MJ, Masters GA, Winchester DJ, Edelman BL, Garrido BJ, Hirschtritt TR, et al. Intraoperative radioisotope sentinel lymph node mapping in non small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:384-90.
10. Finan MA, DeCesare S, Fiorica JV, Chambers R, Hoffman MS, Kline RC, et al. Radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 vs. IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Does the new staging system predict morbidity and survival? Gynecol Oncol 1996;62:139-47.
11. Singh KC, Agarwal A, Agarwal S, Rajaram S, Goel N, Agarwal N. Quick course neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, bleomycin and vincristine in advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2004;58:109-13.
12. Taneja A, Rajaram S, Agarwal S, Singh KC, Goel N. Quick Cycle neonadjuvant chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of cervix. Indian J Pharmacol 2005;37:320-4.
13. Kim SH, Choi BI, Lee HP, Kang SB, Choi YM, Han MC, et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: Comparison of CT and MR findings. Radiology 1990;175:45-51.
14. Ozsarlak O, Tjalma W, Schepens E, Corthouts B, Op de Beeck B, Van Marck E, et al. The correlation of preoperative CT, MRI and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2338-45.
15. Hricak H, Quivey JM, Campos Z. Carcinoma of the cervix: predictive value of clinical and magnetic resomance (MR) imaging assessment of prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:791-801.
16. Pannu HK, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of cervical cancer: spectrum of disease. Radiographics 2001;21:1155-68.
17. Chi DS, Abu-Rustum NR, Hoskins WJ. Cancer of the cervix. TeLinde's operative gynecology. 9 th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 1373-444.
18. Dargent D, Martin X, Mathevet P. Laparoscopic assessment of the sentinel lymph node in early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2000;79:411-5.
19. Barranger E, Grahek D, Cortez A, Talbot JN, Uzan S, Darai E. Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node procedure using a combination of patent blue and radioisotope in women with cervical carcinoma. Cancer 2003;97:3003-9.
20. Di Stefano AB, Acquaviva G, Garozzo G, Barbic M, Cvjeticanin B, Meglic L, et al. Lymph node mapping and sentinel node detection in patients with cervical carcinoma: a 2-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2005;99:671-9.
21. Verheijen RHM, Pijpers R, van Diest PJ, Burger CW, Buist MR, Kenemans P. Sentinel node detection in cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:135-8.
22. Zhang WJ, Zheng R, Wu LY, Li XG, Li B, Chen SZ. Clinical application of sentinel lymph node detection to early stage cervical cancer. Ai Zheng 2006;25:224-8.