Research with Aboriginal peoples: Authentic relationships as a precursor to ethical research

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 13-22

  Bull, Julie R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aboriginal health research; Aboriginal research ethics; Community based research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; ESKIMO; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; METHODOLOGY; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INUITS; NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS;

EID: 78650153737     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.13     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BRUNGER, F. (2006). Discrimination génétique et ethique de la recherche: Consentement et politque du risque. In M. H. Parizeau (Ed.), Néoracisme et Derives Généeetiques (pp. 231-246). Quebec City, Quebec: Presses de L'Université Laval.
2. BRUNGER, F. & WEIJER, C. (2007). Politics, risk, and community in the Maya-ICBG case. In J. Lavery, E. Wahl, C. Grady, & E. Emanuel (Eds.), Ethical Issues in International Biomedical Research: A Casebook (pp. 35-42). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. BULL, J. R. (2009). Authentic research relationships to improve Aboriginal health? Halifax, Nova Scotia: Atlantic Aboriginal Health Research Program.
4. BULL, J. R. (2010). When multiple voices collide: Ethics realities in research involving Aboriginal peoples. Paper presented at the 21st Canadian Bioethics Society Annual Conference, Voices of Communities. Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
5. CANADIAN INSTITUTES OF HEALTH RESEARCH (CIHR). (2007). CIHR Guidelines for Health Research Involving Aboriginal Peoples: Draft for Consultation. Retrieved April 1, 2007 from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29134.html.
6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2009). Revised Draft 2nd Edition of the TCPS (December 2009). Retrieved March 10, 2010 from http://pre.ethics.gc. ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/revised-revisee/Default/.
7. COUNCIL FOR INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (CIOMS). (1993). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, edited by WHO Geneva. Retrieved April 2, 2008 from http://www.cioms.ch/frame-guidelines-nov-2002.htm.
8. DAVIS, S. M. & REID, R. (1999). Practicing participatory research in American Indian communities. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(4), 755-759.
9. DEI, G. J. S., HALL, B. L., & ROSENBERG, D. G. (2000). Indigenous Knowledges in Global Contexts: Multiple Readings of Our World. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
10. HAIG-BROWN, C. & DANNENMANN, K. (2000). Some thoughts on protocol in university/community partnership. Retrieved March 10, 2008 from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/depts/sese/csew/nall/res/16somethoughts.htm.
11. INTERAGENCY ADVISORY PANEL ON RESEARCH ETHICS. (1998). Tri-Council Policy Statement for Research Involving Humans. Retrieved June 21, 2010 from http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/tcps-eptc/readtcps-lireeptc/.
12. INTERAGENCY ADVISORY PANEL ON RESEARCH ETHICS. (2009). Revised 2nd Edition of the Tri-Council Policy Statement on Research Involving Humans. Retrieved June 21, 2010 from http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/ initiatives/revised-revisee/Default/.
13. INTERAGENCY ADVISORY PANEL ON RESEARCH ETHICS. (2010). Aboriginal Technical Advisory Committee. Retrieved June 21, 2010 from http://www.pre. ethics.gc.ca/eng/resourcesressources/reports-rapports/arei-iera/.
14. NATIONAL ABORIGINAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION (NAHO). (2000). Governance of Research Involving Human Subjects: Research Brief. Ottawa, Ontario.
15. NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS OF BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Retrieved March 1, 2008 from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm.
16. SCHNARCH, B. (2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80-95.
17. SMITH, L. S. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.
18. WEAVER, H. N. (1997). The challenges of research in Native American communities: Incorporating principles of cultural competence. Journal of Social Service Research, 23(2), 1-15.
19. WEIJER, C. (1999). Protecting communities in research: Philosophical and pragmatic challenges. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 8(4), 501-513.
20. WEIJER, C., GOLDSAND, G., & EMANUEL, E. J. (1999). Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nature Genetics, 23:275-280.
21. WORLD MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. (2000). World Medical Associa tion Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Retrieved March 2, 2008 from http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm.