Obtaining distributions from groups for decisions under uncertainty

Making Essential Choices with Scant Information: Front-End Decision Making in Major Projects

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 257-276

  Cooke, Roger M ^a,b  

^a RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650141316     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230236837     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Anderson S, de Palma A, and Thissen J. (1996). Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. MIT Press: Cambridge.
2. Budnitz R et al. (1998). Use of technical expert panels: applications to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Risk Analysis 18 (4): 463-469.
3. Clemen R. (2008). Comments. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, special issue on Expert Judgement 93 (5): 760-765.
4. Cooke R. (1991). Experts in Uncertainty. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
5. Cooke R (ed.) (2008). Reliability Engineering and System Safety, special issue on Expert Judgement 93 (5): 655-778.
6. Cooke R, El Saadany S, and Xinzheng HX. (2008). On the performance of social network and likelihood based expert weighting schemes. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, special issue on Expert Judgement 93 (5): 645-756.
7. Cooke R and Goossens L. (2000). Procedures Guide for Structured Expert Judgment. Project report EUR 18820EN, Nuclear science and technology, specific programme Nuclear fission safety (1994-1998). Report to: European Commission. Luxembourg, Euratom. Also in Radiation Protection Dosimetry 90 (3): 303-311.
8. Cooke RM and Goossens LHJ. (2008). TU Delft Expert Judgment Data Base, Special issue on expert judgement Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93 (5): 657-674. Available online 12 March 2007.
9. Cooke R, Mendel M, and Thijs W. (1988). Calibration and information in expert resolution. Automatica 24 (1): 87-94.
10. Cooke RM and Misiewicz J. (2007). Discrete choice with probabilistic Inversion: Application to energy policy choice and wiring failure. Mathematical Methods in Reliability July 1-4. University of Strathclyde: Glasgow.
11. Csiszar I. (1975). I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems. Annals of Probability 3: 146-158.
12. Deming W and Stephan F. (1944). On a least squares adjustment to sample frequency tables when the expected marginal totals are known. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 40 (11): 427-444.
13. Du C, Kurowicka D, Cooke RM. (2006). Techniques for generic probabilistic inversion, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (50): 1164-1187.
14. French S. (1985). Group consensus probability distributions: a critical survey. In: Bernardo J, De Groot M, Lindley D, and Smith A (eds). Bayesian Statistics. Elsevier: North Holland, pp. 182-201.
15. Genest C and Zidek J. (1986). Combining probability distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography. Statistical Science 1 (1): 114-148.
16. Goossens L, Cooke R, and Kraan B. (1996). Evaluation of Weighting Schemes for Expert Judgment Studies. Final report prepared under contract Grant No. Sub 94-FIS-040 for the Commission of the European Communities, Directorate General for Science, Research and Development XII-F-6. Delft University of Technology: Delft, Netherlands.
17. Goossens L, Cooke R, and Kraan B. (1998). Evaluation of weighting schemes for expert judgment studies. In: Mosleh A and Bari R (eds). Proceedings PSAM4. Springer: New York, pp. 1937-1942.
18. Goossens L, Cooke R, and van Steen J. (1989). Final Report to the Dutch Ministery of Housing, Physical Planning and Environment. On The Use of Expert Judgment in Risk and Safety Studies I - 5. Delft.
19. Goossens L and Harper F. (1998). Joint EC/USNRC expert judgement driven radiological protection uncertainty analysis. Journal of Radiological Protection 18 (4): 249-264.
20. Kurowicka D and Cooke R. (2006). Uncertainty Analysis with High Dimensional Dependence. Wiley: New York.
21. Lin S and Bier V. (2008). A Study of Expert Over-confidence. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, special issue on Expert Judgment 93 (5): 711-721.
22. Neslo R et al. (2008). Modeling stakeholder preferences with probabilistic inversion: Application to prioritizing marine ecosystem vulnerabilities. In: Linkov I, Ferguson E, and Magar V (eds). Real Time and Deliberative Decision Making: Application to Risk Assessment for Non-chemical Stressors. Springer: Amsterdam, pp. 248-271.
23. NUREG/CR-6372. (1997). Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
24. O'Hagan A et al. (2006). Uncertain Judgments, Eliciting experts' Probabilities. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex.
25. Qing X. (2002). Risk Analysis for Real Estate Investment. PhD thesis, Department of Architecture, TU Delft.
26. Train K. (2003). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
27. Winkler R et al. (1995). An assessment of the risk of chronic lung injury attributable to long-term ozon exposure. Operations Research 43 (1): 19-27.
28. Wisse B, Bedford T, and Quigley J. (2008). Expert judgement combination using moment methods. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93 (5): 675-686.