Effects of Youth Authorship on the Appraisal of Paintings

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 235-246

  Isham, Eve A ^a   Ekstrom, Arne D ^b   Banks, William P ^c  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c POMONA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Authorship bias; Emotions; Youth artist

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650136545     PISSN: 19313896     EISSN: 1931390X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019308     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berlyne D.E. Aesthetics and psychobiology 1971, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
2. Bernberg R.E. Prestige suggestion in art as communication. The Journal of Social Psychology 1953, 38:23-30.
3. Burke E. A philosophical inquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful 1990, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, (Original work published 1757).
4. Crozier W.R., Greenhalgh P. The empathy principle: Towards a model of the psychology of art. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 1992, 22:63-79.
5. Cupchik G.C., Oatley K., Vorderer P. Emotional effects of reading excerpts from short stories by James Joyce. Poetics 1998, 25:363-377.
6. Duerksen G.L. Some effects of expectation on evaluation of recorded musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education 1972, 20:268-272.
7. Gentle K. Children and art teaching 1985, Croom Helm, London.
8. Gergen K.J., Breger I. Two forms of inference and problems in the assessment of creativity. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 1965, 20:215-216.
9. Hekkert P., van Wieringen P.C.W. The impact of level of expertise on the evaluation of original and altered versions of post-Impressionistic paintings. Acta Psychologica 1996, 94:117-131.
10. Immordino-Yang M.H., McColl A., Damasio H., Damasio A. Neural correlates of admiration and compassion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2009, 106:8021-8026.
11. Keltner D., Haidt J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition & Emotion 2003, 17:297-314.
12. Kirk U., Skov M., Hulme O., Christensen M.S., Zeki S. Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 2009, 44:1125-1132.
13. Leder H., Belke B., Oesberst A., Augustin D. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology 2004, 95:489-508.
14. Leder H., Carbon C.C., Ripsas A.L. Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica 2006, 12:176-198.
15. Marcus S., Opera P., Sandulescu M. Painting evaluation as affected by properties of the stimulus. Revista de Psihologie 1973, 19:225-237.
16. Moll J., de Oliveira-Souza R., Zahn R. The neural basis of moral cognition: Sentiments, concepts, and values. The year in cognitive neuroscience 2008, 161-180. Blackwell Publishing, Malden. A. Kingstone, M.B. Miller (Eds.).
17. Osborne H. Aesthetics and art theory 1968, Longmans, London.
18. Ramachandran V.S., Hirstein W. The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1999, 6:15-51.
19. Russell P.A. Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings. British Journal of Psychology 2003, 94:99-110.
20. Selfe L. Nadia: A case of extraordinary drawing ability in an autistic child 1977, Academic Press, London.
21. Silvia P. Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology 2005, 9:342-357.