The latent structure of dietary restraint, body dissatisfaction, and drive for thinness: A series of taxometric analyses

Psychological Assessment

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 788-797

  Holm Denoma, Jill M ^a   Richey, J Anthony ^b   Joiner, Thomas E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Body dissatisfaction; Dietary restraint; Drive for thinness; Eating disorders; Taxometric analysis

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BODY WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET RESTRICTION; EATING DISORDERS EXAMINATION QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; SELF CONCEPT; STUDENT ATTITUDE; TAXOMETRIC ANALYSIS; UNIVERSITY STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY IMAGE; DIET, REDUCING; DRIVE; EATING DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS; THINNESS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650121757     PISSN: 10403590     EISSN: 1939134X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020132     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 2000, American Psychiatric Association, Author, Washington, DC. 4th ed., text rev.
2. Anestis M., Holm-Denoma J.M., Gordon K.H., Schmidt N.B., Joiner T.E. The role of anxiety sensitivity in eating pathology. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2008, 32:370-385.
3. Blashfield R., Sprock J., Fuller A.K. Suggested guidelines for including or excluding categories of the DSM-IV. Comprehensive Psychiatry 1990, 31:15-19.
4. Carson R.C. Dilemmas in the pathway of DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1991, 100:302-307.
5. Eberenz K., Gleaves D. An examination of the internal consistency and factor structure of the Eating Disorder Inventory in a clinical sample. International Journal of Eating Disorders 1994, 16:371-379.
6. Fairburn C.G., Beglin S.J. Assessment of eating disorders: Interview or self-report questionnaire?. International Journal of Eating Disorders 1994, 16:363-370.
7. Fairburn C.G., Bohn K. Eating disorder NOS (EDNOS): An example of the troublesome "not otherwise specified" (NOS) category in DSM-IV. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2005, 43:691-701.
8. Fairburn C.G., Cooper Z., Shafran R. Cognitive behavioural therapy for eating disorders: A "transdiagnostic" theory and treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2003, 41:509-528.
9. First M., Gibbon M., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B.W. User's guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Research Version 1996, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department, New York, NY.
10. Gangestad S., Snyder M. "To carve nature at its joints": On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review 1985, 92:317-349.
11. Garner D., Olmsted M., Bohr Y., Garfinkel P. The Eating Attitudes Test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine 1982, 12:871-878.
12. Garner D., Olmsted M., Polivy J. Development and validation of a multi-dimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. International Journal of Eating Disorders 1983, 2:15-34.
13. Gleaves D.H., Brown J.D., Warren C.S. The continuity/discontinuity models of eating disorders: A review of the literature and implications for assessment, treatment, and prevention. Behavior Modification 2004, 28:739-762.
14. Gleaves D.H., Lowe M.R., Green B.A., Cororve M.B., Williams T.L. Do anorexia and bulimia nervosa occur on a continuum? A taxometric analysis. Behavior Therapy 2000, 31:195-219.
15. Gleaves D.H., Lowe M., Snow A., Green B., Murphy-Eberenz K. Continuity and discontinuity models of bulimia nervosa: A taxometric investigation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2000, 109:56-68.
16. Hay P., Fairburn C. The validity of the DSM-IV scheme for classifying bulimic disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders 1998, 23:7-15.
17. Herman C.P., Mack D. Restrained and unrestrained eating. Journal of Personality 1975, 43:647-660.
18. Hildebrandt T., Langenbucher J., Carr S., Sanjuan P. Modeling population heterogeneity in appearance- and performance-enhancing drug (APED) use: Applications of mixture modeling in 400 regular APED users. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2007, 116:717-733.
19. Jacobi C., Hayward C., de Zwaan M., Kraemer H., Agras W. Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: Application of risk terminology and suggestions for a general taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin 2004, 130:19-65.
20. Keel, P. K., Crosby, R., Holm-Denoma, J., Haedt, A., Gravener, J., Joiner, T., & Hildebrandt, T. (2010). Latent structure of eating disorders: Comparisons to DSM-IV and proposed DSM-5 definitions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21. Keel P.K., Fichter M., Quadflieg N., Bulik C.M., Baxter M.G., Thornton L., Kaye W.H. Application of a latent class analysis to empirically define eating disorder phenotypes. Archives of General Psychiatry 2004, 61:192-200.
22. Koff E., Rierdan J. Perceptions of weight and attitudes towards eating in early adolescent girls. Journal of Adolescent Health 1991, 12:307-312.
23. Lenzenweger M. Consideration of the challenges, complications, and pitfalls of taxometric analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2004, 113:10-23.
24. Luce K.H., Crowther J.H. The reliability of the Eating Disorder Examination-Self Report Questionnaire version (EDE-Q). International Journal of Eating Disorders 1999, 25:349-351.
25. Luce K.H., Crowther J., Pole M. Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire: Norms for undergraduate women. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2008, 41:273-276.
26. Meehl P.E. Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers 1973, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
27. Meehl P.E. Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality 1992, 60:117-174.
28. Meehl P.E. Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist 1995, 50:266-274.
29. Meehl P.E., Yonce L.J. Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity using two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychological Reports 1994, 74:1059-1274.
30. Meehl P.E., Yonce L.J. Taxometric analysis: II. Detecting taxonicity using covariance of two quantitative indicators in successive intervals of a third indicator (MAXCOV procedure). Psychological Reports 1996, 78:1091-1227.
31. Mond J., Hay P., Rodgers B., Owen C. Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q): Norms for young adult women. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2006, 44:53-62.
32. Muthén B. Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional?. Addiction 2006, 101:6-16.
33. Muthén B., Asparouhov T. Item response mixture modeling: Application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addictive Behaviors 2006, 31:1050-1066.
34. Passi V., Bryson S., Lock J. Assessment of eating disorders in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: Self-report questionnaire versus interview. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2003, 33:45-54.
35. Peñas-Lledó E., Fernández-Aranda F., Jiménez-Murcia S., Granero R., Penelo E., Soto A., Menchón J.M. Subtyping eating disordered patients along drive for thinness and depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2009, 47:513-519.
36. Polivy J., Herman C. Etiology of binge eating: Psychological mechanisms. Binge eating: Nature, assessment, and treatment 1993, 173-205. Guilford Press, New York, NY. C. Fairburn, G. Wilson (Eds.).
37. Regier D., Narrow W., Kuhl E., Kupfer D. The conceptual development of DSM-V. American Journal of Psychiatry 2009, 166:645-650.
38. Ruscio J. Taxometric analysis: An empirically grounded approach to implementing the method. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2007, 34:1588-1622.
39. Ruscio J. Taxometric program code [Software] 2009, Retrieved from http://www.taxometricmethod.com/TaxProg%202009-08-03.R.
40. Ruscio J., Kaczetow W. Differentiating categories and dimensions: Evaluating the robustness of taxometric analyses. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2009, 44:259-280.
41. Ruscio J., Marcus D.K. Detecting small taxa using simulated comparison data: A reanalysis of Beach, Amir, and Bau's (2005) data. Psychological Assessment 2007, 19:241-246.
42. Ruscio J., Ruscio A.M. A structure-based approach to psychological assessment: Matching measurement models to latent structure. Assessment 2002, 9:4-16.
43. Ruscio J., Ruscio A.M., Meron M. Applying the bootstrap to taxometric analysis: Generating empirical sampling distributions to help interpret results. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007, 42:349-386.
44. Ruscio J., Walters G., Marcus D., Kaczetow W. Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests. Psychological Assessment 2010, 22:5-21.
45. Schmidt N., Kotov R., Joiner T. Taxometrics: Toward a new diagnostic scheme for psychology 2004, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
46. Snow, A., Pearson, C., Brown, J., Cororve, M., & Gleaves, D. (2000, August). A taxometric analysis of anorexia nervosa. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
47. Stice E. Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 2002, 128:825-848.
48. Stice E., Agras S. Subtyping bulimic women along dietary restraint and negative affect dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1999, 67:460-469.
49. Stice E., Fisher M., Lowe M.R. Are dietary restraint scales valid measures of acute dietary restriction? Unobtrusive observational data suggest not. Psychological Assessment 2004, 16:51-59.
50. Striegel-Moore R., Schreiber G., Pike K., Wilfley D., Robin J. Drive for thinness in Black and White preadolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders 1995, 18:59-69.
51. Tylka T., Subich L. Revisiting the latent structure of eating disorders: Taxometric analysis with nonbehavioral indicators. Journal of Counseling Psychology 2003, 50:276-286.
52. Waller N.G., Meehl P.E. Multivariate taxometric procedures: Distinguishing types from continua 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
53. Walsh, B. T., & Sysko, R. (in press). Broad categories for the diagnosis of eating disorders (BCD-ED): An alternative system for classification. International Journal of Eating Disorders.
54. Walters G.D., Ruscio J. To sum or not to sum: Taxometric analysis with ordered categorical assessment items. Psychological Assessment 2009, 21:99-111.
55. Walters, G. D., & Ruscio, J. (in press). Where do we draw the line? Assigning cases to subsamples for MAMBAC, MAXCOV, and MAXEIG taxometric analyses. Assessment.
56. Widiger T., Coker L. Mental disorders as discrete clinical conditions: Dimensional versus categorical classification. Adult psychopathology and diagnosis 2003, 3-35. Wiley, New York, NY. 4th ed. M. Hersen, S.M. Turner (Eds.).
57. Williamson D., Gleaves D., Stewart T. Categorical versus dimensional models of eating disorders: An examination of the evidence. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2005, 37:1-10.
58. Williamson D., Womble L., Smeets M., Netemeyer R., Thaw J., Kutlesic V., Gleaves D. Latent structure of eating disorder symptoms: A factor analytic and taxometric investigation. American Journal of Psychiatry 2002, 159:412-418.
59. Wonderlich S., Joiner T., Keel P., Williamson D., Crosby R. Eating disorder diagnoses: Empirical approaches to classification. American Psychologist 2007, 62:167-180.