Letter by chalmers regarding article "Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery: Twelve-month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial"

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Chalmers, Nicholas ^a  

^a MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NITINOL;

ARTERY LESION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMORAL ARTERY LESION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; POPLITEAL ARTERY LESION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ALLOYS; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; COST CONTROL; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 78650119272     PISSN: 19417640     EISSN: 19417632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.958173     Document Type: Letter

References (1)

1. Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M, Dave R, Ansel G, Lansky A, Cristea E, Collins TJ, Goldstein J, Jaff MR; for the RESILIENT Investigators. Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery; twelve month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:267-276.