Transferring qualities from horseback riding to design

NordiCHI 2010: Extending Boundaries - Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 226-235

  Höök, Kristina ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Autoethnography; Bodily interaction; Embodiment; Experiential qualities

Indexed keywords

AUTOETHNOGRAPHY; BODILY INTERACTION; DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; DESIGN TASKS; DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES; EMBODIMENT; EXPERIENTIAL QUALITIES; RIDING EXPERIENCE;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; RIDING QUALITIES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 78650089202     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1868914.1868943     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Boehner, K., Sengers, P. and Warner, S. (2008). Interfaces with the ineffable: Meeting aesthetic experience on its own terms. In ACM Transactions on ComputerHuman Interaction, 15 (3).
2. Bødker, S. (2006) When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Keynote paper, Proc. of NordiCHI.
3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial, London.
4. Darwin, C. (1872/1998) The expression of emotions in man and animals, Third ed. by Paul Ekman. Oxford University Press, 1872/1998.
5. Game, A. (2001) Riding: Embodying the Centaur, 7 (4): 1, Body & Society, 2001; 7; 1.
6. Heal J. (1989). Fact and Meaning: Quine and Wittgenstein on Philosophy of Language, Blackwell, Oxford.
7. Hillerup Fogtmann, M., Fritsch, J., Kortbek, K. J. (2008). Kinesthetic interaction - revealing the bodily potential in interaction design, Proc. of the 20th Australasian Conf. on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat, 2008, Australia.
8. Isbister, K. Höök, K. (2009). On being supple: in search of rigor without rigidity in meeting new design and evaluation challenges for HCI practitioners, In 27th international conf. on Human factors in computing systems, Boston, MA, ACM Press.
9. Ingolds, T. (2006). Walking the plank: meditations on a process of skill, in J. R. Dakers (ed), Defining technological literacy: towards an epistemological framework New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), pp 65-80.
10. Kay, A. (2003). Education in the digital age. (27:45) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2950949730059754521&hl=en.
11. Khut, G. (2006) Interactive Art as Embodied Enquiry: Working with audience experience. In Edmonds, E., Muller, L., & Turnbull. D. (Eds.) Engage: Interaction, Arts & Audience Experience. University of Technology, Sydney, Creativity and Cognition Studios Press.
12. Klemmer, S., Hartmann, B., Takayama, L. (2006). How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design, In Proc. of DIS 2006: ACM Conf. on the Design of Interactive Systems. State College, PA, 2006.
13. Laban, R., Lawrence, F.C., (1974). Effort Economy of Human Effort, Second ed. Macdonald & Evans Ltd., London, UK.
14. Laurier, E. and Brown, B. (2004) Cultures of seeing: pedagogies of the riverbank, Manuscript, Institute of Geography, Edinburgh Univ., 2004 online: www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/elaurier/texts/Laurier-cultur es-of-seeing.pdf
15. Ljungblad, Sara (2009) Passive photography from a creative perspective: "If I would just shoot the same thing for seven days, it's like⋯ What's the point?". Proc. of 27th International Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA, ACM Press.
16. Ljungblad, S. Holmquist, L-E. (2007) Transfer scenarios: grounding innovation with marginal practices, Proc. of the SIGCHI conf. on Human factors in computing systems, San Jose, California, ACM Press.
17. Löwgren J. (2001). From HCI to Interaction Design. In Chen, Qiyang (ed.), Human-Computer Interaction: Issues and Challenges, Hershey, USA: Idea Group Inc.
18. Kosmack Vaara, E., Höök, K., Tholander, J. (2009) Mirroring bodily experiences over time, Proc. of the 27th international conf. extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Boston, MA, ACM Press.
19. McCarthy, A. Wright, P. (2004) Technology as Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The Phenomenology of Perception, C. Smith, trans., London: Routledge & Kegan.
21. Moen, J., (2006). KinAesthetic movement interaction: designing for the pleasure of motion. Doctoral Thesis, KTH, NADA, Stockholm, Sweden.
22. Quine, W.V. (1960). Word and Object, MIT Cambridge.
23. Sanches, P., Höök, K., Kosmack Vaara, E., Weymann, C., Bylund, M., Sjölinder, M. (2010). Mind the Body! Designing a Mobile Stress Management Application Encouraging Personal Reflection, In Designing Interactive Systems, DIS 2010, ACM Press.
24. Sengers, P. (1998). Anti-Boxology: Agent Design in Cultural Context. Ph.D. Thesis, School of CS, Carnegie Mellon University. Technical Report CMU-CS-98-151.
25. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999) Emotion and Movement: A beginning Empirical-Phenomenological Analysis of Their Relationship, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, No. 11-12, pp. 259-277.
26. Ståhl, A., (2006). Designing for emotional expressivity. Unpublished Licentiate Thesis in Design, Umeå Design Institute, Umeå University, Sweden.
27. Sundström, P., Ståhl, A., and Höök, K. (2005). eMoto-Affectively Involving both Body and Mind, In Extended abstract CHI2005, Portland, Oregon.
28. Taylor, A. S. (2009). Machine intelligence, Proc. of the 27th international conf. on Human factors in computing systems, Boston, MA, ACM Press.
29. Tholander, J., Johansson, C. (2010). Bodies, boards, clubs and bugs: A study of bodily engaging artefacts. In Extended Abstracts 28th ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, ACM Press.
30. st Intern. Conf. on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, ACM Press.