Statistical analysis of the relationship between public transport accessibility and flat prices in Riga

Transport and Telecommunication

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 26-32

  Pavlyuk, Dmitry ^a  

^a TRANSPORT AND TELECOMMUNICATION INSTITUTE   (Latvia)

Author keywords

Geographically weighted regression; Hedonic price model; Public transport accessibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650085564     PISSN: 14076160     EISSN: 1407179     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Spatial Plan of Riga for 2006-2018. Riga City Council, 2005. 214 p.
2. Report for the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Atis Real Weatheralls, University College London, and Symonds Group Land Value and Public Transport, 2002. 36 p.
3. Fik, T.J. and Ling, D.C., and Mulligan, G.F. Modeling spatial variation in housing prices: a variable interaction approach, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 4, 2003, pp. 623-646.
4. Fotheringham, A.S., Brunsdon, C., and Charlton, M. E. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. Chichester: Wiley, 2002. 282 p.
5. Du, H. and Mulley, C. Transport accessibility and land value: a case study of Tyne and Wear, RICS Research paper series, Vol. 7, No 3, 2007. 52 p.
6. Levinson, D.M. and Krizel, K.J. Access to Destinations. New York: Elsevier Science, 2005. 422 p.
7. Geurts, K.T., Ritsema van Eck, J.T. Accessibility Measures: review and applications: RIVM Report 408505 006. Utrecht University, 2001, p. 147.
8. Hometrack report. Key housing market statistics for England and Wales. UK House Price Statistics, 2005. 8 p.
9. Haining, R. Spatial Data analysis. Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 431 p.