Multiple streams in EU policy-making: The case of the 2005 sugar reform

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 72-89

  Ackrill, Robert ^a   Kay, Adrian ^b  

^a NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Eu sugar reform; Institutional ambiguity; Multiple streams model; Policy entrepreneurship; Policy spillovers

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650069272     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2011.520879     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ackrill, R. and Kay, A. (2009) 'Historical learning in the design of WTO rules: the EC sugar case', The World Economy 32(5): 754-71.
2. Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S. (1970) Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Barzelay, M. and Gallego, R. (2006) 'From "new institutionalism" to "institutional processualism": advancing knowledge about public management policy change', Governance 19(4): 531-57.
4. Borrás, S. and Radaelli, C. (2009) 'The politics of governance architectures: institutions, power, and public policy in the EU Lisbon strategy', paper delivered to the ECPR joint sessions of workshops, Lisbon, Portugal, 14-19 April, available online at http://www.arena.uio.no/events/seminarpapers/2009/Borras-Radaelli.pdf (accessed 20 August 2009).
5. Bruntrup, M. (2007) 'EBA and the EU sugar market reform: development gift or Trojan horse?', in G. Faber and J. Orbie (eds), European Union Trade Politics and Development: 'Everything but Arms' Unravelled, London: Routledge, pp. 179-202.
6. Corbett, A. (2005) Universities and the Europe of Knowledge: Ideas, Institutions and Policy Entrepreneurship in European Union Higher Education Policy, 1955-2005, Basing stoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Cram, L. (2001) 'Whither the Commission? Reform, renewal and the issue-attention cycle', Journal of European Public Policy 8(5): 770-86.
8. Daugbjerg, C. and Swinbank, A. (2008) 'Curbing agricultural exceptionalism: the EU's response to external challenge', The World Economy 31(5): 631-52.
9. European Commission (2009) 'CAP reform: Commission welcomes success of EU sugar reform as restructuring process concludes', press release IP/09/366, 6 March 2009, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/366&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en (accessed 7 March 2009).
10. Haas, E.B. (1968) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950-1957, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Kingdon, J.W. (2003) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed., New York: Longman.
12. Mintrom, M. (2000) Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice, Washington, DC: George town University Press.
13. Natali, D. (2004) 'Europeanization, policy arenas, and creative opportunism: the politics of welfare state reforms in Italy', Journal of European Public Policy 11(6): 1077-95.
14. Peters, B.G. (1994) 'Agenda-setting in the European Community', Journal of European Public Policy 1(1): 9-26.
15. Pollitt, C. (2008) Time, Policy, Management: Governing with the Past, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Richardson, J. (2006) 'Policy-making in the EU: interests, ideas and garbage cans of primeval soup', in J. Richardson (ed.), European Union Power and Policy-making, 3rd edn, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 3-30.
17. WTO (2004) 'Special and differential treatment for Least Developed Countries: note by the secretariat', WT/COMTD/W/135, WTO Committee on Trade and Development, available online at http://docsonline.wto.org/DDFDocuments/t/ WT/COMTD/W135.doc (accessed 5 August 2009).
18. Zahariadis, N. (2003) Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Manipulation in Democratic Societies, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
19. Zahariadis, N. (2007) 'The multiple streams framework: structure, limitations, prospects', in P.A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edn, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 65-92.
20. Zahariadis, N. (2008) 'Ambiguity and choice in European public policy', Journal of European Public Policy 15(4): 514-30.