Biogas potential and microbial population distributions in flushed dairy manure and implications on anaerobic digestion technology

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 145-152

  Frear, Craig ^a   Wang, Zhi Wu ^b   Li, Chenlin ^c   Chen, Shulin ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c JOINT BIOENERGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Biofilm; Dairy manure; Methanogen; Selection pressure

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTER; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION TECHNOLOGY; BIOGAS GENERATION; COLD CLIMATE; DAIRY MANURE; DAIRY MANURES; FLUSHED DAIRY MANURE; HIGH RATE; IMMOBILIZATION MECHANISMS; KINETIC STUDY; LIQUID PHASIS; MICROBIAL POPULATIONS; NATURAL BIOMASS; SELECTION PRESSURES;

BIOFILMS; BIOGAS; LIQUIDS; MANURES; METHANATION; METHANE; METHANOGENS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

BIOGAS; METHANE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BIOMASS DISTRIBUTION; CATTLE; DAIRY PRODUCT; KINETICS; LIQUID; LIQUID PHASE MICROEXTRACTION; MANURE; METHANOGEN; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; MICROORGANISM; MICROSCOPY; PARTICLE SIZE; RUMINANT STOMACH; SOLID PHASE SYNTHESIS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS;

EID: 78650065392     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2484     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Weiske A, Vabitsch A, Olesen JE, Schelde K, Michel J, Friedrich R, et al, Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in European conventional and organic dairy farming. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112: 221-232 (2006).
2. US EPA, Guide to Anaerobic Digesters. Journal [serial on the Internet] (2007). More detail required.
3. Burke DA, Dairy Waste Anaerobic Digestion Handbook. Environmental Energy Company, 6007 Hill Street, Olympia, WA 98516 (2001).
4. Mackie RI, Stroot PG and Varel VH, Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste. J Anim Sci 76: 1331-1342 (1998).
5. Wilkie AC, Castro HF, Cubinski KR, Owens JM and Yan SC, Fixed-film anaerobic digestion of flushed dairy manure after primary treatment: wastewater production and characterisation. Biosyst Eng 89: 457-471 (2004).
6. Vartak DR, Engler CR, McFarland MJ and Ricke SC, Attached-film media performance in psychrophilic anaerobic treatment of dairy cattle wastewater. Bioresource Technol 62: 79-84 (1997).
7. Hills DJ and Kayhanian M, Methane from settled and filtered flushed dairy wastes. Trans ASAE 28: 865-869 (1985).
8. Chastain JP, Vanotti MB and Wingfield MM, Effectiveness of liquid-solid separation for treatment of flushed dairy manure: a case study. Appl Eng Agric 17: 343-354 (2001).
9. McAllister TA, Bae HD, Jones GA and Cheng KJ. Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen. J Anim Sci 72: 3004-3018 (1994).
10. Weber S, Stubner S and Conrad R, Bacterial populations colonizing and degrading rice straw in anoxic paddy soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 1318-1327 (2001).
11. Hu B and Chen SL, Pretreatment of methanogenic granules for immobilized hydrogen fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32: 3266-3273 (2007).
12. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC (1998).
13. Woli KP, Nagumo T, Kuramochi K and Hatano R, Evaluating river water quality through land use analysis and N budget approaches in livestock farming areas. Sci Total Environ 329: 61-74 (2004).
14. Wright WF (ed.), Dairy manure particle size distribution, properties, and implications for manure handling and treatment. ASAE Annual International Meeting, Tampa, FL. Paper Number 054105 (2005).
15. Meyer D, Ristow PL and Lie M, Particle size and nutrient distribution in fresh dairy manure. Appl Eng Agric 23: 113-117 (2007).
16. Bath DL, Ronning M, Lofgreen GP and Meyer JH, Influence of variations in ruminal contents upon estimates of body weight change of dairy cattle during restricted feeding. J Dairy Sci 49: 830-834 (1966).
17. Mcallister TA, Rode LM, Major DJ, Cheng KJ and Buchanansmith JG, Effect of ruminal microbial colonization on cereal grain digestion. Can J Anim Sci 70: 571-579 (1990).
18. Dinsdale D, Morris EJ and Bacon JSD, Electron microscopy of the microbial populations present and their modes of attack on various cellulosic substrates undergoing digestion in the sheep rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 36: 160-168 (1978).
19. Shinkai T and Kobayashi Y, Localization of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria on plant fibrous materials as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 1646-1652 (2007).
20. Weimer PJ, Price NPJ, Kroukamp O, Joubert LM, Wolfaardt GM and Van Zyl WH, Studies of the extracellular glycocalyx of the anaerobic cellulolytic bacterium Ruminococcus albus 7. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 7559-7566 (2006).
21. Gerritse J and Gottschal JC, 2-membered mixed cultures of methanogenic and aerobic-bacteria in O2-limited chemostats. J Gen Microbiol 139: 1853-1860 (1993).
22. McGarvey JA, Miller WG, Sanchez S and Stanker L. Identification of bacterial populations in dairy wastewaters by use of 16S rRNA gene sequences and other genetic markers. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 4267-4275 (2004).
23. Costerton JW, Pivotal role of biofilms in the focused attack of bacteria on insoluble substrates. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 30: 123-133 (1992).
24. Liu WT, Chan OC and Fang HHP. Characterization of microbial community in granular sludge treating brewery wastewater. Water Res 36: 1767-1775 (2002).
25. Schink B, Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 262-280 (1997).
26. Schmidt JE and Ahring BK, Acetate and hydrogen metabolism in intact and disintegrated granules from an acetate-fed, 55 °C, UASB reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 35: 681-685 (1991).
27. Schmidt JE and Ahring BK, Immobilization patterns and dynamics of acetate-utilizing methanogens immobilized in sterile granular sludge in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 1050-1054 (1999).
28. Wang ZW, Li Y and Liu Y, Mechanism of calcium accumulation in acetate-fed aerobic granule. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74: 467-473 (2007).
29. Wang ZW, Liu Y and Tay JH, The role of SBR mixed liquor volume exchange ratio in aerobic granulation. Chemosphere 62: 767-771 (2006).
30. Cheng KJ, McAllister TA and Costerton JW, Biofilms of the ruminant digestive tract. in Microbial Biofilms. ed. by Lappin-Scott HM and Costerton JW. Cambridge University Press, New York, 221-232 (1995).
31. Forsberg CW and Lam K, Use of adenosine 5'-triphosphate as an indicator of the microbiota biomass in rumen contents. Appl Environ Microbiol 33: 528-537 (1977).
32. Craig WM, Broderick GA and Ricker DB, Quantitation of microorganisms associated with the particulate phase of ruminal ingesta. J Nutr 117: 56-62 (1987).
33. Latham MJ, Adhesion of rumen bacteria to plant cell walls. in Microbial Adhesion to Surfaces, ed. by Berkeley RCW, Lynch JM, Melling J, Rutter PR and Vincent B. Ellis Horwood, West Sussex (1980).
34. Bath DL, Ronning M, Lofgreen GP and Meyer JH, Influence of variations in ruminal contents upon estimates of body weight change of dairy cattle during restricted feeding. J Dairy Sci 49: 830-834 (1966).
35. Owens FN and Goetsch AL, Digesta passage and microbial protein synthesis. in Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, ed. by Milligan LP, Grovum WL and Dobson A. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1986).
36. Liu Y, Wang ZW, Qin L, Liu YQ and Tay JH. Selection pressure-driven aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67: 26-32 (2005).
37. Hulshoff Pol LW, Heijnekamp K and Lettinga G. The selection pressure as a driving force behind the granulation of anaerobic sludge. in Granular Anaerobic Sludge: Microbiology and Technology, Lettinga G, Zehnder AJB, Grotenhuis JTC and Hulshoff Pol LW. Wageningen, Netherlands, 153-161 (1988).
38. Alphenaar P, Visser A and Lettinga G, The effect of liquid upward velocity and hydraulic retention time on granulation in UASB reactors treating wastewater with a high sulphate content. Bioresource Technol 43: 249-258 (1993).
39. Andersson J and Bjornsson L, Evaluation of straw as a biofilm carrier in the methanogenic stage of two-stage anaerobic digestion of crop residues. Bioresource Technol 85: 51-56 (2002).
40. Svensson LM, Bjornsson L and Mattiasson B, Enhancing performance in anaerobic high-solids stratified bed digesters by straw bed implementation. Bioresource Technol 98: 46-52 (2007).
41. Yoon BT, Kim GY, Kim SB and Choi MJ, Manufacture of the fluidizing media using rice straw and paper wastewater treatment. Palpu Chongi Gisul/J. Korea Technical Assoc Pulp Paper Ind 39: 9-16 (2007).