Air Removal Efficiency of a Venous Bubble Trap in a Minimal Extracorporeal Circuit During Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Artificial Organs

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1092-1098

  Roosenhoff, Tamara P A ^a   Stehouwer, Marco C ^a   De Vroege, Roel ^b   Butter, René P ^c   Van Boven, Wim Jan ^a   Bruins, Peter ^a  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b HAGA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c RBPA Statistical Consulting   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Air handling; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Gaseous micro emboli; Minimized extracorporeal circuits

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; DIGITAL STORAGE;

AIR HANDLING; AIR REMOVAL; BUBBLE-TRAP; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CIRCUIT SYSTEMS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCUITS; GASEOUS MICRO EMBOLUS; MINIMIZED EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCUIT; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES;

TIMING CIRCUITS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MINIMIZED EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCUIT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VEIN EMBOLISM; VENOUS BUBBLE TRAP;

EID: 78650056809     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00986.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Gerritsen WB, Van Boven WJ, Wesselink RM, et al. Significant reduction in blood loss in patients undergoing minimal extracorporeal circulation. Transfus Med 2006;16:329-34.
2. Wiesenack C, Liebold A, Philipp A, et al. Four years' experience with a miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system and its influence on clinical outcome. Artif Organs 2004;28:1082-8.
3. Norman MJ, Sistino JJ, Acsell JR. The effectiveness of low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol 2004;36:336-42.
4. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, et al. How effective are cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous microemboli? J Extra Corpor Technol 2002;34:34-9.
5. Borger MA, Peniston CM, Weisel RD, et al. Neuropsychologic impairment after coronary bypass surgery: effect of gaseous microemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:743-9.
6. Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, et al. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:89-93.
7. Rodriguez RA, Williams KA, Babaev A, et al. Effect of perfusionist technique on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 2005;20:3-10.
8. Muth CM, Shank ES. Gas embolism. N Engl J Med 2000;342:476-82.
9. Barak M, Katz Y. Microbubbles: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Chest 2005;128:2918-32.
10. Perthel M, Kseibi S, Sagebiel F, et al. Comparison of conventional extracorporeal circulation and minimal extracorporeal circulation with respect to microbubbles and microembolic signals. Perfusion 2005;20:329-33.
11. Liebold A, Khosravi A, Westphal B, et al. Effect of closed minimized cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral tissue oxygenation and microembolization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:268-76.
12. Nollert G, Schwabenland I, Maktav D, et al. Miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass surgery: marginal impact on inflammation and coagulation but loss of safety margins. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:2326-32.
13. Huybregts RM, Veerman DP, Vonk AB, et al. First clinical experience with the air purge control and electrical remote-controlled tubing clamp in mini bypass. Artif Organs 2006;30:721-4.
14. Mitsumaru A, Yozu R, Matayoshi T, et al. Efficiency of an air filter at the drainage site in a closed circuit with a centrifugal blood pump: an in vitro study. ASAIO J 2001;47:692-5.
15. Calafiore AM, Mezzetti A, Bosco G, et al. Intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:398-402.
16. Mitchell S, Gorman D. The pathophysiology of cerebral arterial gas embolism. J Extra Corpor Technol 2002;34:18-23.
17. Kofidis T, Fischer S, Leyh R, et al. Clinical relevance of intracranial high intensity transient signals in patients following prosthetic aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:22-6.
18. Nadareishvili ZG, Beletsky V, Black SE, et al. Is cerebral microembolism in mechanical prosthetic heart valves clinically relevant? J Neuroimaging 2002;12:310-5.
19. Gerriets T, Schwarz N, Sammer G, et al. Protecting the brain from gaseous and solid micro-emboli during coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J 2010;31:360-8.
20. Matayoshi T, Yozu R, Morita M, et al. Development of a completely closed circuit using an air filter in a drainage circuit for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Artif Organs 2000;24:454-8.
21. LaPietra A, Grossi EA, Pua BB, et al. Assisted venous drainage presents the risk of undetected air microembolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:856-62.
22. Rider SP, Simon LV, Rice BJ, et al. Assisted venous drainage, venous air, and gaseous microemboli transmission into the arterial line: an in-vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol 1998;30:160-5.
23. Win KN, Wang S, Undar A. Microemboli generation, detection and characterization during CPB procedures in neonates, infants, and small children. ASAIO J 2008;54:486-90.
24. Rodriguez RA, Rubens F, Belway D, et al. Residual air in the venous cannula increases cerebral embolization at the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:175-80.