An activity-based approach for complex travel behaviour modelling

European Transport Research Review

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 209-221

  Bifulco, Gennaro Nicola ^a   Cartenì, Armando ^b   Papola, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Activity based; Demand model; Nested logit; RP survey; Transport model; Travel behaviours

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY-BASED; DEMAND MODELS; NESTED LOGIT; RP SURVEY; TRANSPORT MODELS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR;

CATCHMENTS; MODELS; SURVEYS;

TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 78650043248     PISSN: 18670717     EISSN: 18668887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12544-010-0040-3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ruiter ER, Ben-Akiva M (1978) Disaggregate travel demand models for the San Francisco Bay Area. Transp Res Rec 673: 121-128.
2. Domencich T, McFadden D (1975) Urban travel demand: a behavioural analysis. North-Holland, Netherland.
3. Richards MG, Ben-Akiva M (1975) A disaggregate travel demand model. Lexington Books, USA.
4. Horowitz J (1980) A utility maximizing model of the demand for multi-destination non-work travel. Transp Res B 14B: 369-386.
5. Adler T, Ben-Akiva M (1979) A theoretical and empirical model of trip chaining behavior. Transp Res B 13: 243-257.
6. Gunn HF, van der Hoorn AIJM, Daly AJ (1987) Long range country-wide travel demand forecasts from models of individual choice, in Proc. Fifth International Conference on Travel Behaviour (Aiix-en Provence).
7. Hague Consulting Group (1992) The Netherlands National model 1990: the national model system for traffic and transport. Ministry of Transport and Public Works, Netherlands.
8. Algers S, Daly A, Kjelmann P, Wildert S (1995) Stockholm model system (SISM): application. In Proc. Seventh World Conference of Transportation Research. Sydney, Australia.
9. Cascetta E, Nuzzolo A, Velardi V (1993) A system of mathematical models for the evaluation of integrated traffic planning and control policies, technical report Laboratorio Ricerche Gestione e Controllo Traffico. Salerno, Italia.
10. Jones PM, Koppelman F, Orfeuil JP (1990) Activity analysis: state-of-the-art and future directions. In: Jones P (ed) Developments in dynamic and activity-based approaches to travel analysis. Gower, Aldershot.
11. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR, Damm D, Jacobson J, Pitschke S, Weisbrod G, Wolfe R (1980) Understanding, prediction and evaluation of transportation related consumer behaviour, Center for Transportation Studies, MIT. Cambridge, Massachussetts.
12. Pas EI, Koppelman FS (1987) An examination of the determinants of day-to-day variability in individuals' urban travel behavior. Transportation 14: 3-20.
13. Pas EI (1988) Weekly travel-activity behavior. Transportation 15: 89-109.
14. Meloni I, Cherchi E (1997) Activity based approach: un'applicazione alla generazione degli spostamenti. In: Amoroso S, Crotti A (eds) Proc. Il Trasporto Pubblico nei Sistemi Urbani e Metropolitani, vol 1. SIDT Collana Trasporti, Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 65-94.
15. Cirillo C, Axhausen KW (2002) Mode choice of complex tours. In Proc. European Transport Conference. Cambridge, UK, September.
16. Bhat CR, Guo JY, Srinivasan S, Sivakumar A (2004) A comprehensive econometric micro-simulator for daily activity-travel patterns. Transp Res Rec 1894: 57-66.
17. Bowman JL, Ben-Akiva ME (2001) Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transp Res A 35: 1-28.
18. Townsend TA (1987) The effects of household characteristics on the multi-day time allocations and travel-activity patterns of households and their members, Ph. D. thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
19. Kitamura R (1988) An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation 15: 1-2.
20. van Wissen LJ (1989) A model of household interactions in activity patterns. In Proc. International Conference on Dynamic Travel Behavior Analysis. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, pp 16-17, July.
21. Golob TF, McNally MG (1997) A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads. Transp Res B 31(3): 177-194.
22. McNally MG (2000) The activity-based approach, Institute of Transportation Studies and Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of California, Irvine.
23. Olaru D, Smith B (2005) Modelling behavioural rules for daily activity scheduling using fuzzy logic. Transportation 32(4): 423-441.
24. Lee M, McNally MG (2006) An empirical investigation on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining. Transportation 33(6): 553-565.
25. de Luca S, Papola A (2001) Un sistema di modelli per la valutazione degli impatti di politiche di gestione della domanda di mobilità nell'area metropolitana di Napoli. In Proc. Metodi e tecnologie dell'ingegneria dei trasporti - Conference 1999. Franco Angeli Editore, Milano, pp 292-309.