NGOs in India's elite newspapers: A framing analysis

Asian Journal of Communication

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 477-493

  de Souza, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

India; Media; NGOs

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649978410     PISSN: 01292986     EISSN: 17420911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01292986.2010.496863     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Akhavan-Majid, R., & Ramaprasad, J. (1998). Framing and ideology: A comparative analysis of US and Chinese newspaper coverage of the Fourth United Nations Conference on Women and the NGO Forum. Mass Communication and Society, 1, 131-152.
2. Bendaña, A. (2006). NGOs and social movements: A north/south divide? Civil Society and Social Movements Programme Paper, no. 22, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/4F7CC72852DD23EBC12571D1002B45AD/$file/Bendana.pdf
3. Bennett, W.L., Pickard, V.W., Iozzi, D.P., Schroeder, C.L., Lagos, T., & Caswell, C.E. (2004). Managing the public sphere: Journalistic construction of the great globalization debate. Journal of Communication, 54(3), 437-455.
4. Broad, R. (2002). Global backlash: Citizen initiatives for a just world. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
5. Carragee, K.M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214-233.
6. Campos, N.G., & Farmer, P. (2003). Partners: Discernment and humanitarian efforts in settings of violence. The Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics, 31(4), 506-514.
7. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
8. Chan, J.M., & Lee, C.C. (1984). The journalistic paradigm on civil protests: A case study of Hong Kong. In: A. Arno & W. Dissanayake (Eds.), The news media in national and international conflict (pp. 183-202.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
9. Creedon, P.J. (1993). Framing feminism. A feminist primer for the mass media. Media Studies Journal, 8, 68-80.
10. DeLuca, M., & Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the 'violence' of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 125-151.
11. Eade, D. (2000). Development NGOs and civil society. Oxford: Oxfam.
12. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996a). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961-973.
13. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996b). NGO performance and accountability in the post-Cold War world. Journal of International Development, 7(6), 849-856.
14. Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-57.
15. Gamson, W., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373-393.
16. Gamson, W.A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R.A. Braumgart (Ed.), Research in political sociology (pp. 137-177). Greenwich: JAI.
17. Ganesh, S. (2005). Organizational narcissism: Technology, legitimacy. and identity in an Indian NGO. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 558-594.
18. Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S.R. (2004). A loss of credibility: patterns of wrongdoing among nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(5), 355-381.
19. Giffard, C.A. (1999). The Beijing Conference on Women as seen by three international news agencies. Gazette, 61(3-4),327-341.
20. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
22. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
23. Hall, S. (1981). A world at one with itself. In S. Cohen & J. Young (Eds.), The manufacture of news, social problems, deviance and the mass media. London: Constable.
24. Inamder, N.R. (1987). Role of voluntarism in development. The Indian Journal of Public Administration, 33, 420-432.
25. Indian Readership Survey. (2009). Newswatch desk. Retrieved January 25, 2010, from http:// archives.newswatch.in/newsblog/4185
26. Korten, D.C. (1990). Getting to the 21st century, voluntary action and the global agenda. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
27. Kothari, R. (1986). NGOs, the state, and world capitalism. Economic and Political Weekly, 21, 2177-2182.
28. Lind, R.A., & Salo, C. (2002). The framing of feminists and feminism in news and public affairs programs in US electronic media. Journal of Communication, 52, 211-228.
29. McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency 1930 1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. McLeod, D., & Detenber, B. (1999). Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication, 49(3), 3-23.
31. Munk Nielsen, J. (2001). The legitimacy concept and its potentialities: A theoretical reconstruction with relevance to public relations. Unpublished dissertation, University of Roskilde, Denmark.
32. Muttalib, M.A. (1987). Voluntarism and development: theoretical perspectives. The Indian Journal of Public Administration, 33, 399-419.
33. Norris, P. (1995). The restless searchlight: network news framing of the post-cold war world. Political Communication, 12(1), 357-370.
34. Oliver, P.E., & Maney, G.M. (2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 106,463-505.
35. One World South Asia. (2008). HIV/AIDS strategies working in India. Retrieved April 15, 2009, from http://southasia.oneworld.net/opinioncomment/2018hiv-aids-strategies-working-in-india2019
36. Registrar for Newspapers in India. (2005). Press in India 2002: General review. Retrieved May 15,2005, from https://rni.nic.in
37. Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. Boston: South End Press.
38. Salamon, L.M. (1993). The global associational revolution: The rise of third sector on the world scene (No. Occas. Pap. 15). Baltimore: Institution of Policy Studies, John Hopkins University.
39. Sen, S. (1992). Non-profit organizations in India: Historical development and common patterns. Voluntas, 3, 175-193.
40. Sen, S. (1993). Defining the nonprofit sector: India. In L.M. Salamon & H.K. Anheier (Eds.), Working papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, 12. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.
41. Shumate, M., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. (2005). Predictors of the International HIV-AIDS INGO network over time. Human Communication Research, 31(4), 482-510.
42. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications.
43. Trenz, H.-J. (2004). Media coverage on European governance exploring the European public sphere in national quality newspapers. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), 291-319.
44. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
45. Vaknin, S. (2005). NGOs: The self-appointed altruists. The Global Politician. Retrieved March 15,2006, from http://globalpolitician.com/articleshow.asp?ID=569&cid=10&sid=49
46. Voluntary Action Network. (2009). Facts and figures about NGOs. Retrieved September 28, 2009, from http://www.vaniindia.org/inf_NGOfact.asp
47. World Bank. (2004). World Bank resources: TN 18: Definitions. Retrieved September 28, 2009, from http://www.worldbank.org/participation/PRSP/technotes/tn18.htm