Blessing or curse? Appreciation, amenities and resistance to urban renewal

Regional Science and Urban Economics

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 32-45

  Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cultural amenities; Displacement pressure; Hedonic modeling; Mediaspree; Urban development

Indexed keywords

AMENITY; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN POLITICS; URBAN RENEWAL; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

BERLIN; GERMANY;

EID: 78649967355     PISSN: 01660462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ahlfeldt G.M. Built environment as determinant for attractiveness of location. DISP - The Planning Review 2009, 179:46-56.
2. Ahlfeldt G.M. (in press) If Alonso was right: Modeling Accessibility and Explaining the Residential Land Gradient. Journal of Regional Science, forthcoming.
3. Ahlfeldt G.M., Maennig W. Arenas, arena architecture and the impact on location desirability: the case of "olympic arenas" in Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg. Urban Studies 2009, 46(7):1343-1362.
4. Ahlfeldt G.M., Maennig W. Substitutability and complementarity of urban amenities: external effects of built heritage in Berlin. Real Estate Economics 2010, 38(2):285-323.
5. Ahlfeldt G.M., Maennig W., Scholz H. Expected external effects and voting: the case of the Munich Allianz-Arena. Journal of Economics and Statistics 2010, 230(1):2-26.
6. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models 1988, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
7. Arntz M., Wilke R.A. An application of cartographic area interpolation to German administrative data. Advances in Statistical Analysis 2007, 91(2):159-180.
8. Atkinson R. Measuring gentrification and displacement in greater London. Urban Studies 2000, 37(1):149-165.
9. Atkinson R. The evidence on the impact of gentrification: new lessons for the urban renaissance?. European Journal of Housing Policy 2004, 4(1):107-131.
10. Brueckner J.K., Rosenthal S.S. Gentrification and Neighborhood Housing Cycles: Will America's Future Downtowns be Rich? SSRN eLibrary 2005.
11. Brunner E., Sonstelie J. Homeowners, property values, and the political economy of the school voucher. Journal of Urban Economics 2003, 54(2):239-257.
12. Brunner E., Sonstelie J., Thayer M. Capitalization and the voucher: an analysis of precinct returns from California's proposition 174. Journal of Urban Economics 2001, 50(3):517-536.
13. Butler T. Gentrification and the Middle Classes 1997, Ashgate, Aldershot.
14. Caufield J. City Form and Everyday Life: Toronto's Gentrification and Critical Social Practice 1994, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
15. Clark D.E., Kahn J.R. The social benefits of urban cultural ameneties. Journal of Regional Science 1988, 28(3):363.
16. Clay P.L. Neighborhood Renewal. Middle-class Resettlement and Incumbent Upgrading in American Neighbourhood 1979, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
17. Cleveland W.S., Devlin S.J. Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1988, 83(No. 403):596-610.
18. Coates D., Humphreys B.R. Proximity benefits and voting on stadium and arena subsidies. Journal of Urban Economics 2006, 59(2):285-299.
19. Committee of Valuation Experts in Berlin Compilation of Purchasing Price Data 2008, Berlin.
20. Coulson N.E., Lahr M.L. Gracing the land of Elvis and Beale Street: historic designation and property values in Memphis. Real Estate Economics 2005, 33(3):487-507.
21. Dehring C.A., Depken C.A., Ward M.R. A direct test of the homevoter hypothesis. Journal of Urban Economics 2008, 64(1):155-170.
22. DETR Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions: Towards an urban renaissance: sharing the vision 1999, http://www.regeneration.detr.gov.uk/urbanren/1.html.
23. District Authority Bürgerentscheid in Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg am 13. Juli 2008. Amtliches Endergebnis des Bürgerentscheides "Spreeufer für alle! 2008, (Vol. http://www.berlin.de/ba-friedrichshain-kreuzberg/verwaltung/org/wahlamt/ be_spree2.html).
24. DJMAG (2009) Top 100 Clubs! DJMAG, 471.
25. Fischel F.A. The Homevoter Hypothesis 2001, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, Vol.
26. Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class - and How it's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life 2002, Basic Books, New York.
27. Freeman L., Braconi F. Gentrification and displacement. The Urban Prospect 2002, 8(1):1-4.
28. Freeman L., Braconi F. Gentrification and displacement. Journal of the American Planning Association 2004, 70(1):39-52.
29. Friedrichs J. Gentrification. Großstadt. Soziologische Stichworte 2000, Leske+Budrich, Opladen. H. Häußermann (Ed.).
30. Goodchild M.F., Lam N.S. Areal interpolation: a variant of the traditional spatial problem. Geo-Processing 1980, 1:297-312.
31. Hicks R.L., Queen B.M. Valuing historical and cultural amenities with Hedonic property valuation models. CRE Working Papers, 2007(05) 2007.
32. Hilber C.A.L., Mayer C.J. Why do households without children support local public schools?. Journal of Urban Economics 2009, 65(1):74-90.
33. HUD US Department of Housing and Urban Development: The state of the cities 1999, http://www.huduser.org/publications/polleg/tsoc99/tsoc_99.html.
34. Investitionsbank Berlin IBB Wohnungsmarkbericht 2007 2007, Berlin.
35. Jenks G.F. Optimal Data Classification for Choropleth Maps, Occasional Paper, No. 2 1977, Lawrence, Kansas.
36. King G. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data 1997, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
37. King G., Rosen O., Tanner M.A. Ecological Inference: New Methodological Strategies 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. Knotts H.G., Haspel M. The impact of gentrification on voter turnout. Social Science Quarterly 2006, 87(1):110-121.
39. Lee F and Hebel C (2007) Kreuzberger pfeifen auf Entertainment. taz, 23.04.2007.
40. Lees L. A reappraisal of gentrification: towards a 'geography of gentrification'. Progress in Human Geography 2000, 24(3):389-408.
41. LeRoy S.F., Sonstelie J. Paradise lost and regained: transportation innovation, income, and residential location. Journal of Urban Economics 1983, 13(1):67-89.
42. Ley D. The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City 1996, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
43. Lokshin M. Difference-based semiparametric estimation of partial linear regression models. The Stata Journal 2006, 6(3):377-383.
44. Marcuse P. Abandonment, gentrification, and displacement: the linkages in New York City. Gentrification in the City 1986, Vol. 153-177. Unwin Hyman, London. N. Smith, P. Williams (Eds.).
45. Marcuse P. On the Presentation of Research About Gentrification 2005, Department of Urban Planning, Columbia University, New York.
46. McKinnish T., Walsh R., White K. Who gentrifies low-income neighborhoods?. NBER Working Paper Series, 14036 2008.
47. McMillen D.P. One hundred fifty years of land values in Chicago: a nonparametric approach. Journal of Urban Economics 1996, 40(1):100-124.
48. McMillen D.P., McDonald J.F. Reaction of house prices to a new rapid transit line: Chicago's midway line, 1983-1999. Real Estate Economics 2004, 32(3):463-486.
49. McMillen D.P., Thorsnes P. The reaction of housing prices to information on superfund sites: a semiparametric analysis of the Tacoma, Washington Market. Advances in Econometrics: Applying Kernel and Nonparametric Estimation to Economic Topics 2000, Vol. 14:201-228. JAI Press, Stamford, CT.
50. McMillen D.P., Thorsnes P. The Aroma of Tacoma. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2003, 21(2):237-246.
51. Murphy K.M., Topel R.H. Estimation and inference in two-step econometric models. Journal of Business & Economics Statistics 2002, 20(1):88-97.
52. Newman K., Wyly E.K. The right to stay put, revisited: gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York city. Urban Studies 2006, 43(1):23-57.
53. Nitsch V. Fly or cry: is airport noise costly?. CESifo Working Paper Series 2009, 2732:1-30.
54. Noonan D.S. Contingent valuation and cultural resources: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Journal of Cultural Economics 2003, 27(3):159-176.
55. Rapp T. Lost and Sound: Berlin, Techno und der Easyjetset 2009, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt (Main.
56. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 1974, 82(1):34-55.
57. Rushton M. Support for earmarked public spending on culture: evidence from a referendum in Metropolitan Detroit. Public Budgeting & Finance 2005, 25(4):72-85.
58. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung Berlin Urban and Environmental Information System 2006, Berlin.
59. SC, Oehler K and Benjamin B (undated) Buying Into Bohemia: the Impact of Cultural Amenities on Property Values. Center for Creative Communitiy Development, unknown.
60. Shively W.P. 'Ecological' inference: the use of aggregate data to study individuals. American Political Science Review 1969, 63(4):1183-1196.
61. Smith N. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City 1996, Routledge, London and New York.
62. Tiebout C. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 1956, 64(5):416-424.
63. van Heur B. The clustering of creative networks: between myth and reality. Urban Stud 2009, 46(8):1531-1552.
64. van Heur B. Networks of Aesthetic Production and the Urban Political Economy 2008, Free University Berlin, Berlin.
65. Veal A.J. The concept of lifestyle: a review. Leisure Studies 1993, 12(4):233-252.
66. Vigdor J.L. Does Gentrification Harm the Poor? Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2002, 133-182.
67. Waldfogel J. The median voter and the median consumer: local private goods and population composition. Journal of Urban Economics 2008, 63(2):567-582.