Adapting UML activity diagrams for mobile work process modelling: Experimental comparison of two notation alternatives

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 68 LNBIP, Issue , 2010, Pages 145-161

  Gopalakrishnan, Sundar ^a   Krogstie, John ^a   Sindre, Guttorm ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

enterprise modeling; mobile information systems; modelbased development; Requirements specifications; UML activity diagram

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SPECIFICATIONS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

ENTERPRISE MODELING; MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODEL BASED DEVELOPMENT; REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATIONS; UML ACTIVITY DIAGRAMS; ENTERPRISE MODELLING;

INDUSTRY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 78649963664     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16782-9_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Unified Modelling Language, http://www.uml.org (accessed 4.6.2010)
2. Business Process Modelling Notation, http://www.bpmn.org/ (accessed 4.6.2010)
3. Korherr, B., List, B.: Extending the UML 2 Activity Diagram with Business Process Goals and Performance Measures and the Mapping to BPEL. In: Roddick, J., Benjamins, V.R., Si-said Cherfi, S., Chiang, R., Claramunt, C., Elmasri, R.A., Grandi, F., Han, H., Hepp, M., Lytras, M.D., Miši?, V.B., Poels, G., Song, I.-Y., Trujillo, J., Vangenot, C. (eds.) ER Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4231, pp. 7-18. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
4. Walderhaug, S., Stav, E., Marius Mikalsen, M.: Experiences from Model-Driven Development of Homecare Services: UML Profiles and Domain Models. In: Chaudron, M.R.V. (ed.) Models in Software Engineering. LNCS, vol. 5421, pp. 199-212. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
5. Gopalakrishnan, S., Sindre, G.: Alternative Process Notations for Mobile Information Systems. In: Proc. I-ESA 2010, Coventry, UK, Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
6. Andresen, S., Krogstie, J., Jelle, T.: Lab and Research Activities in Wireless Trondheim. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems, pp. 385-389. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)
7. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modelling Language: User Guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)
8. Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modelling of Enterprises. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
9. Veijalainen, J.: Developing Mobile Ontologies; who, why, where, and how? In: International Conference on Mobile Data Management, Manheim, Germany, pp. 398-401. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)
10. Larsson, A. V.: Designing for use in a future Context - Five Case Studies in Retrospect, PhD thesis No: 1034, Institute of Tech., Linkoping Univ., Sweden (2003)
11. Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press (1983)
12. Moody, D.L.: The "Physics" of Notations: Towards a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transanctions on Software Eng. 35(6), 776-779 (2009)
13. Field, A., Hole, G.: How to Design and Report Experiments. Sage Publications, London (2003)
14. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319-340 (1989)
15. Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 26(3), 276-291 (1987)
16. Hopkins, W.G.: A New View of Statistics. University of Queensland, Australia, Brisbane (2001)
17. Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G.: Experimental comparison of attack trees and misuse cases for security threat identification. Information and Software Technology 51(5), 916-932 (2009)
18. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic, Norwell (2000)
19. Siau, K.: Informational and Computational Equivalence in Comparing Information Modeling Methods. Journal of Database Management 15(1), 73-86 (2004)