Patterns of genotype-by-environment interaction in diameter at breast height at age 3 for eucalypt hybrid clones grown for reafforestation of lands affected by salinity

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 833-851

  Hardner, Craig M ^a   Dieters, Mark ^a   Dale, Glenn ^b   DeLacy, Ian ^a   Basford, Kaye E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b Tree Crop Technologies Pty Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

Eucalyptus; Genetic correlations; Heritability; Hybrids; Linear mixed model; Pattern analysis; Salinity; Spatial analysis

Indexed keywords

EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS CAMALDULENSIS; EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS; EUCALYPTUS GRANDIS;

EID: 78649962094     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-010-0295-9     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Allard RW, Bradshaw AD (1964) Implications of genotype-environment interaction in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci 4: 503-508.
2. Basford KE, Cooper M (1998) Genotype × environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia. Aust J Agric Res 49: 153-174.
3. Bell DT (1999) Australian trees for the rehabilitation of waterlogged and salinity-damaged landscapes. Aust J Bot 47: 697-716.
4. Bouvet JM, Saya A, Vigneron P (2009) Trends in additive, dominance and environmental effects with age for growth traits in Eucalyptus hybrid populations. Euphytica 165: 35-54.
5. Burdon RD (1977) Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet 26: 168-175.
6. Burgueno J, Crossa J, Cornelius PL, Yang RC (2008) Using factor analytic models for joining environments and genotypes without crossover genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci 48: 1291-1305.
7. Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ (2009) ASReml-R reference manual. The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane.
8. Clarke GM (1993) The genetic basis of developmental stability. 1. Relationships between stability, heterozygosity and genomic coadaptation. Genetica 89: 15-23.
9. Cooper M, Delacy IH (1994) Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic varaition and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant-breeding multi-environment experiements. Theor Appl Genet 88: 561-572.
10. Cooper M, Brennan PS, Sheppard JA (1996a) A strategy for yield improvement of wheat which accommodates large genotype by environment interactions. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CABI, Wallingford, pp 487-512.
11. Cooper M, DeLacy IH, Basford KE (1996b) Relationships among analytical methods used to analyse genotypic adaptation in multi-environment trials. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International, Oxon, pp 193-224.
12. Cooper M, Stucker RE, DeLacy IH, Harch BD (1997) Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Sci 37: 1168-1176.
13. Costa e silva J, Borralho NMG, Araujo JA, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (2009) Genetic parameters for growth, wood density and pulp yield in Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Genet Genomes 5: 291-305.
14. Costa e silva J, Dutkowski GW, Gilmour AR (2001) Analysis of early tree height in forest genetic trials is enhanced by including a spatially correlated residual. Can J For Res-Rev Can Rech For 31: 1887-1893.
15. Costa e silva J, Graudal L (2008) Evaluation of an international series of Pinus kesiya provenance trials for growth and wood quality traits. For Ecol Manage 255: 3477-3488.
16. Costa e silva J, Potts BM, Dutkowski GW (2006) Genotype by environment interaction for growth of Eucalyptus globulus in Australia. Tree Genet Genomes 2: 61-75.
17. Cullis B, Gogel B, Verbyla A, Thompson R (1998) Spatial analysis of multi-environment early generation variety trials. Biometrics 54: 1-18.
18. Cullis BR, Gleeson AC (1991) Spatial-analysis of field experiments-an extension in 2 dimensions. Biometrics 47: 1449-1460.
19. Cullis BR, Smith AB, Coombes NE (2006) On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 11: 381-393.
20. Cullis BR, Thomson FM, Fisher JA, Gilmour AR, Thompson R (1996a) The analysis of the NSW wheat variety database. 1. Modelling trial error variance. Theor Appl Genet 92: 21-27.
21. Cullis BR, Thomson FM, Fisher JA, Gilmour AR, Thompson R (1996b) The analysis of the NSW wheat variety database. 2. Variance component estimation. Theor Appl Genet 92: 28-39.
22. Dale G, Dieters M (2007) Economic returns from environmental problems: breeding salt- and drought-tolerant eucalypts for salinity abatement and commercial forestry. Ecol Eng 31: 175-182.
23. DeLacy IH, Basford KE, Cooper M, Bull JK, McLaren CG (1996) Analysis of multi-environment trials: an historical perspective. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 39-124.
24. Dungey HS (2001) Pine hybrids-a review of their use performance and genetics. For Ecol Manage 148: 243-258.
25. Dungey HS, Dieters MJ, Gwaze DP, Toon PG, Nikles DG (2000) Interspecific pine hybrids II. Genotype by environment interactions across Australia, Swaziland and Zimbabwe. For Genetics 7: 21-30.
26. Dunn GM, Taylor DW, Nester MR, Beetson TB (1994) Performance of 12 selected Australian tree species on a saline site in southeast Queensland. For Ecol Manage 70: 255-264.
27. Dutkowski GW, Silva JCE, Gilmour AR, Lopez GA (2002) Spatial analysis methods for forest genetic trials. Can J For Res-Rev Can Rech For 32: 2201-2214.
28. Dutkowski GW, Silva JCE, Gilmour AR, Wellendorf H, Aguiar A (2006) Spatial analysis enhances modelling of a wide variety of traits in forest genetic trials. Can J For Res-Rev Can Rech For 36: 1851-1870.
29. Falconer DS (1952) The problem of environment and selection. Am Nat 86: 293-298.
30. Falconer DS (1989) An introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London.
31. Fox GP, Bowman J, Kelly A, Inkerman A, Poulsen D, Henry R (2008) Assessing for genetic and environmental effects on ruminant feed quality in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Euphytica 163: 249-257.
32. Frensham A, Cullis B, Verbyla A (1997) Genotype by environment variance heterogeneity in a two-stage analysis. Biometrics 53: 1373-1383.
33. Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Verbyla AP (1997) Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 2: 269-273.
34. Gilmour AR, Gogel B, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006) ASReml user guide release 2. 0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead.
35. Gordon IL (1999) Quantitative genetics of intraspecies hybrids. Heredity 83: 757-764.
36. Hahsler M, Hornik K, Buchta C (2008) Getting things in order: an introduction to the R package seriation. J Stat Softw 25: 34.
37. Hardner CM, Dieters M, DeLacy I, Neal J, Fletcher S, Dale G, Basford KE (2009) Identifying deployment zones for Eucalyptus camaldulensis x E. globulus and × E. grandis hybrids using factor analytic modelling of genotype by environment interaction. Australasian Forest Genetics Conference. Forest Products Commission, Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia.
38. John JA, Williams ER (1995) Cyclic and computer generated designs. Chapman and Hall, London.
39. Kelly AM, Smith AB, Eccleston JA, Cullis BR (2007) The accuracy of varietal selection using factor analytic models for multi-environment plant breeding trials. Crop Sci 47: 1063-1070.
40. Kelly AM, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Eccleston JA, Thompson R (2009) Estimation in a multiplicative mixed model involving a genetic relationship matrix. Genet Sel Evol 41: 33-33.
41. Kempton RA (1984) The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. J Agric Sci 103: 123-135.
42. Kendall MG, Stuart A, Ord JK (1987) Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, vol 3: design and analysis, and time series. Oxford University Press, New York.
43. Li BL, Wu RL (1997) Heterosis and genotype × environment interactions of juvenile aspens in two contrasting sites. Can J For Res-Rev Can Rech For 27: 1525-1537.
44. Matheson AC, Cotterill PP (1990) Utility of genotype × environment interactions. For Ecol Manage 30: 159-174.
45. Mathews KL, Chapman SC, Trethowan R, Pfeiffer W, van Ginkel M, Crossa J, Payne T, DeLacy I, Fox PN, Cooper M (2007) Global adaptation patterns of Australian and CIMMYT spring bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 115: 819-835.
46. Meddings RA, McComb JA, Calver MC, Thomas SR, Mazanec RA (2003) Eucalyptus camaldulensis × globulus hybrids. Aust J Bot 51: 319-331.
47. Meddings RLA, McComb JA, Bell DT (2001) The salt-waterlogging tolerance of Eucalyptus camaldulensis × E. globulus hybrids. Aust J Exp Agric 41: 787-792.
48. Mirzawan PDN, Cooper M, DeLacy IH, Hogarth DM (1994) Retrospective analysis of the relationship among the test environments of the Southern Queensland sugarcane breeding program. Theor Appl Genet 88: 707-716.
49. Mrode RA (2005) Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.
50. Myburg AA, Vogl C, Griffin AR, Sederoff RR, Whetten RW (2004) Genetics of postzygotic isolation in Eucalyptus: whole-genome analysis of barriers to introgression in a wide interspecific cross of Eucalyptus grandis and E. globulus. Genetics 166: 1405-1418.
51. NLWRA (2000) Australian dryland salinity assessment 200, extent, impacts, processes, monitoring and management options. National Land and Water Resources Audit, Canberra, p 129.
52. Pannell DJ (2001) Dryland salinity: economic, scientific, social and policy dimensions. Aust J Agr Resour Econ 45: 517-546.
53. Patterson HD, Silvey V, Talbot M, Weatherup STC (1977) Variability of yields of cereal varieties in UK trials. J Agric Sci 89: 239-245.
54. Piepho HP (1997) Analyzing genotype-environment data by mixed models with multiplicative terms. Biometrics 53: 761-766.
55. Potts BM, Dungey HS (2004) Interspecific hybridization of Eucalyptus: key issues for breeders and geneticists. New For 27: 115-138.
56. Schofield NJ (1991) Tree planting for dryland salinity control in Australia. National Australian Conference on the Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture. Kluwer, Albury, Australia, pp 1-23.
57. Smith A, Cullis B, Thompson R (2001) Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trend. Biometrics 57: 1138-1147.
58. Smith AB, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2005) The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches. J Agric Sci 143: 449-462.
59. Stern H, de Hoedt G, Ernst J (2000) Objective classification of Australian climates. Aust Meteorol Mag 49: 87-96.
60. Thoday JM (1955) Balance, heterozygosity and developmental stability. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 20: 318-326.
61. Thompson R, Cullis B, Smith A, Gilmour A (2003) A sparse implementation of the average information algorithm for factor analytic and reduced rank variance models. Aust N Z J Stat 45: 445-459.
62. van Eeuwijk FA, Cooper M, DeLacy IH, Ceccarelli S, Grando S (2001) Some vocabulary and grammar for the analysis of multi-environment trials, as applied to the analysis of FPB and PPB trials. Euphytica 122: 477-490.
63. Wu RL (1997) Genetic control of macro- and micro-environmental sensitivities in Populus. Theor Appl Genet 94: 104-114.
64. Wu RL, Li BL (2000) A quantitative genetic model for analyzing species differences in outcrossing species. Biometrics 56: 1098-1104.
65. Ye TZ, Jayawickrama KJS (2008) Efficiency of using spatial analysis in first-generation coastal Douglas-fir progeny tests in the US Pacific Northwest. Tree Genet Genomes 4: 677-692.
66. Yu QB, Pulkkinen P (2003) Genotype-environment interaction and stability in growth of aspen hybrid clones. For Ecol Manage 173: 25-35.