Community-based rehabilitation and health professional practice: Developmental opportunities and challenges in the global North and South

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 165-173

  Lang, Raymond ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community based rehabilitation; participation; professional practice

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; DISABLED PERSON; FAMILY; HUMAN RIGHTS; MEDICAL PROFESSION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; ROLE PLAYING; THEORETICAL MODEL;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DISABLED PERSONS; FAMILY; HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; HUMAN RIGHTS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ROLE;

EID: 78649953252     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2010.487923     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barnes C. Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: a case for anti-discrimination legislation. London: Hurst & Co.; 1991.
2. Charlton JI. Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000.
3. Lang R. The development and critique of the social model of disability. London: Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre; 2007.
4. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, United Nations. New York: Department of Social and Economic Affairs; 2007. Electronic Citation. www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf. Last accessed
5. Kjmr AM. Governance: key concepts series. 72 ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2004.
6. Smith BC. Good governance and development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.
7. Kroger T. Care research and disability studies: nothing in common? Crit Soc Pol 2009;29:398.
8. Oliver M. Social work: disabled people and disabling environments. Jessica Kingsley Pub; 1991.
9. Sin CH. Medicalising disability? Regulation and practice around fitness assessment of disabled students and professionals in nursing, social work and teaching professions in Great Britain. Disabil Rehabil 2009;1:1-9.
10. Oliver M. The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 1990.
11. Helander E. Prejudice and dignity: an introduction to community-based rehabilitation. New York: United Nations Development Programme; 1993.
12. Wolffers I, Finkenflugel HJ. PHC and CBR: concepts for empowerment. In: Finkenflugel HJ, editor. The handicapped community. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press; 1994.
13. Helander E, Mendis P, Nelson G, Goerdt A. Training in the community for people with disabilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1989.
14. ILO, UNESCO, WHO. Community-based rehabilitation for and is with people with disabilities. Geneva: ILO, UNESCO, WHO; 1994.
15. ILO, UNESCO, WHO. CBR: a strategy for rehabilitation, equalisation of opportunity, poverty reduction and social inclusion of people with disabilities. Geneva: ILO, UNESCO, WHO; 2004.
16. Krefting D. Letter to the editor. Asia Pacif Disabil Rehabil J 1997;8:20-21.
17. Disability, Poverty and the Millennium Development Goals: Relevance, Challenges and Opportunities for DFID Thomas P. London,: DFID Knowledge and Research Programme on Disability and Development: 2005. Electronic Citation. www.disabilitykar.net/docs/policy-final.doc. Last accessed September 2009.
18. Yeo R, Moore K. Including disabled people in poverty reduction work: "Nothing about us, without us". World Develop 2003;31:571-590.
19. Chambers R. Whose reality counts? Purring the first last. London: Intermediate Technology; 1997.
20. About the community-based rehabilitation (CBR) matrix WHO. Whose reality counts? Purring the first last. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007. Electronic Citation. http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/CBR%20MA- TRIX%202008%20update.pdf. Last accessed October 2009.
21. Lysack C, Kaufert J. Comparing the origins and ideologies of the independent living movement and community based rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res 1994;17:231.
22. Scotch RK. Politics and policy in the history of the disability rights movement. The Milbank Quart 1989;380-400.
23. Thomas C. Sociologies of disability and mental illness: contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan; 2007.
24. Finkenflugel H, Cornielje H, Velema J. The use of classification models in the evaluation of CBR programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2007;99-999:1-7.
25. Cleaver F. Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. J Int Develop 1999;11:597-612.
26. Cooke B, Kothari U. The case for participation as tyranny. London: Zed Books; 2001.
27. Coleridge P. Cultural values and disability: the example of Afghanistan. In: Stone E, editor. Disability and development: learning from action and research in the majority world. Leeds: The Disability Press; 1999.
28. Boyce W, Lysack C. Community participation: uncovering its meaning in CBR. In: Thomas M, Thomas MJ, editors. Selected readings in CBR Series 2. Bangalore: Occasional publication of the Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal; 2000.
29. Lang R. Empowerment and CBR? Issues raised by the south Indian experience. In: Stone E, editor. Disability and development: learning from action and research on disability in the majority world. Leeds: Disability Press; 1999.
30. Pollard N, Sakellariou D. Operationalizing community participation in community-based rehabilitation: exploring the factors. Disabil Rehabil 2007;(1):1-9.
31. Sharma M. Community participation in community-based rehabilitation programmes. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2007;30:62-70.
32. Velema JP, Finkenflugel HJM, Cornielje H. Gains and losses of structured information collection in the evaluation of 'rehabilitation in the community' programmes: ten lessons learnt during actual evaluations. Disabil Rehabil 2007;99999:1-9.
33. Lang R. Empowerment and CBR? Issues raised by the South Indian experence. In: Stone E, editor. Disability and development: learning from action and research in the majority world. Leeds: The Disability Press; 1999.
34. Erb S, Harris-White B. Outcast from social welfare: adult disability and incapacity in rural South India. Bangalore: Books for Change; 2001.
35. Easterly WR. The white man's burden: why the West's efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
36. Kottak CP, Cernea M. Putting people first: sociological variables in rural development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1985.
37. Alma-Ata Declaration: International Conference on Primary Health Care, 6th-12th September, 1978. Geneva: WHO; 1978. Electronic Citation. http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/declaration-almaata.pdf. Last accessed October 2007.
38. Rhodes RAW. Policy network analysis. In: Moran M, Rein M, Goodin RE, editors. The Oxford hanbook of public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
39. Sabatier PA, Weible CM. The avocacy coalition framework. In: Sabatier PA, editor. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2007.
40. Newman J, Vidler E. Discriminating customers, responsible patients, empowered users: consumerism and the modernisation of health care. J Soc Pol 2006;35:193-209.
41. Shakespere T. Disability rights and wrongs. Abingdon: Routledge; 2006.