Identifying economic evaluations for health technology assessment

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 436-440

  Glanville, Julie ^a   Paisley, Suzy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bibliographic; Cost benefit analysis; Databases; Information storage and retrieval; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; DATABASES; ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; HIGH YIELD; HIGHLY SENSITIVE; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; SEARCH FILTER; SEARCH TERMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIFIC INFORMATION;

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SERVICES; RATING;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; EMBASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; PRODUCTIVITY; REVIEW;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; HUMANS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 78649942402     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462310000991     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Alton V, Eckerlund I, Norlund A. Health economic evaluations: How to find them. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:512-571.
2. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Grey matters: A practical search tool for evidence-based medicine. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2008. http://www.cadth.ca/index.php/en/cadth/ products/grey-matters (accessed September 3, 2010).
3. Canadian Agency forDrugs and Technologies in Health. Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada. 3rd ed. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2006.
4. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. How are studies identified for NHS EED [Internet]. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb/html/ help.htm (accessed September 3, 2010).
5. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Healthcare. 3rd ed. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009. http:// www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic-Reviews.pdf (accessed September 3, 2010).
6. CODECS [database on the Internet]. Paris: Collège des Economistes de la Santé; 2009. http://infodoc.inserm.fr/codecs/ codecsanglais.nsf/ (Web+English+Startup+Page)?OpenForm (accessed September 3, 2010).
7. Cost-effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry [database on the Internet]. Medford, MA: Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts University; 2009. https://research.tuftsnemc.org/cear/default.aspx (accessed September 3, 2010).
8. Glanville J, Kaunelis D, Mensinkai S.Howwell do search filters perform in identifying economic evaluations in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:522-529.
9. HEED: Health Economics Evaluation Database [database on the Internet]. Wiley Interscience; 2009. http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/book/10.1002/ 9780470510933 (accessed September 3, 2010).
10. Ho C, Li H, Noorani H, et al. Appendix 2: Literature search strategy for cost-effectiveness studies. In: Implantable cardiac defibrillators for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in high risk patients: A meta-analysis of clinical efficacy, and a review of cost-effectiveness and psychosocial issues [Technology report no 81]. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH); 2007. http://www.cadth.ca/media/pdf/332-ICD-tr-appendices-e.pdf (accessed September 3, 2010).
11. Kristensen FB, Sigmund H, eds. Health technology assessment handbook. Copenhagen: Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment; 2008.
12. Macpherson K, Boynton J. Economics filter [Internet]. York: InterTASC Information Specialists' SubGroup; 2009. http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/ intertasc/econ3.htm (accessed September 3, 2010).
13. McKinlay RJ, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:67.
14. National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness. Single technology appraisal (STA). Specification for manufacturer/ sponsor submission of evidence. London: NICE; 2009. http://www.nice.org.uk/media/4D9/DD/ ManufacturerConsulte eTemplateOct09.doc (accessed September 3, 2010).
15. NHS Economic Evaluation Database [database on the Internet]. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb/ (accessed September 3, 2010).
16. PEDE: Paediatric Economic Database Evaluation [database on the Internet]. Toronto: Hospital for Sick Children; 2008. http://pede.ccb.sickkids.ca/pede/ index.jsp (accessed September 3, 2010).
17. Royle P, Waugh N. Literature searching for clinical and costeffectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:1-61.
18. Sassi F, Archard L, McDaid D. Searching literature databases for health care economic evaluations: How systematic can we afford to be? Med Care. 2002;40:387-394.
19. Shemilt I, Mugford M, Byford S, et al. Chapter 15: Incorporating economics evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. updated September 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed September 3, 2010).
20. Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Lavis JN, et al. Optimal search strategies for detecting health services research studies in MEDLINE. CMAJ. 2004;171:1179-1185.