Optimizing model for land use/land cover retrieval from remote sensing imagery based on variable precision rough sets

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 222, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 232-240

  Xie, Feng ^a   Lin, Yi ^b   Ren, Wenwei ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Knowledge granularity; Lake Baiyangdian; Land use land cover; Spectral mode; Variable precision rough sets model; Wetland inventory

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTING PARAMETERS; COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTS; DATA COLLECTION; DATA DIMENSIONS; ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTS; ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; KEY ATTRIBUTES; KNOWLEDGE GRANULARITY; LAND COVER; LAND USE/LAND COVER; LANDSAT-5; MODEL-BASED; NORTHERN CHINA; REMOTE SENSING IMAGERY; RETRIEVAL ACCURACY; SEARCHING ALGORITHMS; SENSING DATA; SPECTRAL BAND; SPECTRAL MODE; VARIABLE PRECISION ROUGH SETS; VARIABLE PRECISION ROUGH SETS MODEL;

DECISION TABLES; ECOLOGY; LAKES; OPTIMIZATION; REMOTE SENSING; WETLANDS;

ROUGH SET THEORY;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATA SET; IMAGERY; LAND COVER; LAND USE; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PIXEL; PRECISION; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; WETLAND;

BAIYANGDIAN LAKE; CHINA; HEBEI;

EID: 78649930823     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. An A.J., Shan N., Chan C., Cercone N., Ziarko W. Discovering rules for water demand prediction: an enhanced rough-set approach (Reprinted from Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 1996, 9:645-653.
2. Bayes T. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Biometrika 1958, 45:296-315.
3. Beynon M. Reducts within the variable precision rough sets model: a further investigation. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 134:592-605.
4. Breunig F.M., Galvao L.S., Formaggio A.R., Couto E.G. The combined use of reflectance, emissivity and elevation ASTER/TERRA data for tropical soil studies. Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo 2009, 33:1785-1794.
5. Cohen J. Citation-classic-a coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences 1986, 18-118.
6. Congalton R.G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1991, 37:35-46.
7. Congalton R.G., Green K. A practical look at the sources of confusion in error matrix generation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1993, 59:641-644.
8. Couto P. Assessing the accuracy of spatial simulation models. Ecological Modelling 2003, 167:181-198.
9. De Laet V., Paulissen E., Meuleman K., Waelkens M. Effects of image characteristics on the identification and extraction of archaeological features from Ikonos-2 and Quickbird-2 imagery: case study Sagalassos (southwest Turkey). International Journal of Remote Sensing 2009, 30:5655-5668.
10. Dekker A.G., Malthus T.J., Seyhan E. Quantitative modeling of inland water-quality for high-resolution MSS systems. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1991, 29:89-95.
11. Dimitras A.I., Slowinski R., Susmaga R., Zopounidis C. Business failure prediction using rough sets. European Journal of Operational Research 1999, 114:263-280.
12. Duggin M.J., Rowntree R., Emmons M., Hubbard N., Odell A.W., Sakhavat H., Lindsay J. The use of multidate multichannel radiance data in urban feature analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment 1986, 20:95-105.
13. Foody G.M. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 2002, 80:185-201.
14. Greco S., Matarazzo B., Slowinski R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 129:1-47.
15. Howari F.M. The use of remote sensing data to extract information from agricultural land with emphasis on soil salinity. Australian Journal of Soil Research 2003, 41:1243-1253.
16. Hu Q.H., Pedrycz W., Yu D.R., Lang J. Selecting discrete and continuous features based on neighborhood decision error minimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics 2010, 40:137-150.
17. Hu Q.H., Yu D.R., Xie Z.X. Information-preserving hybrid data reduction based on fuzzy-rough techniques. Pattern Recognition Letters 2006, 27:414-423.
18. Hu Q.H., Zhao H., Xie Z.X., Yu D.R. Consistency based attribute reduction. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Proceedings 2007, 4426:96-107.
19. Jensen R., Shen Q. Semantics-preserving dimensionality reduction: rough and fuzzy-rough-based approaches. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 2004, 16:1457-1471.
20. Li A.N., Wang A.S., Liang S.L., Zhou W.C. Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in mountainous region using remote sensing and GIS-a case study in the upper reaches of Minjiang River, China. Ecological Modelling 2006, 192:175-187.
21. Li D.R. Towards the development of remote sensing and GIS in the 21st century. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University 2003, 28:127-131. (in Chinese).
22. Mahasandana S., Tripathi N.K., Honda K. Sea surface multispectral index model for estimating chlorophyll a concentration of productive coastal waters in Thailand. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 2009, 35:287-296.
23. Metternicht G. Assessing temporal and spatial changes of salinity using fuzzy logic, remote sensing and GIS. Foundations of an expert system. Ecological Modelling 2001, 144:163-179.
24. Nangendo G., Skidmore A.K., Oosten H.V. Mapping East African tropical forests and woodlands-a comparison of classifiers. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2007, 61:393-404.
25. Norton J., Glenn N., Germino M., Weber K., Seefeldt S. Relative suitability of indices derived from Landsat ETM+ and SPOT 5 for detecting fire severity in sagebrush steppe. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2009, 11:360-367.
26. Oyama Y., Matsushita B., Fukushima T., Matsushige K., Imai A. Application of spectral decomposition algorithm for mapping water quality in a turbid lake (Lake Kasumigaura, Japan) from Landsat TM data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2009, 64:73-85.
27. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 1982, 11:341-356.
28. Pawlak Z., Skowron A. Rough sets: some extensions. Information Sciences 2007, 177:28-40.
29. Prinz T. Multispectral remote sensing of the Gosses Bluff impact crater, central Australia (NT) by using Landsat-TM and ERS-1 data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1996, 51:137-149.
30. Qian L.X. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis and Geographical Features Extraction 2004, Science Press, Beijing, (in Chinese).
31. Ringrose S., Musisi-Nkambwe S., Coleman T., Nellis D., Bussing C. Use of Landsat Thematic Mapper data to assess seasonal rangeland changes in the southeast Kalahari, Botswana. Environmental Management 1999, 23:125-138.
32. Serpico S.B., Moser G. Extraction of spectral channels from hyperspectral images for classification purposes. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2007, 45:484-495.
33. Yang J.H., Honavar V. Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications 1998, 13:44-49.
34. Yao Y.Y., Zhao Y. Attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models. Information Sciences 2008, 178:3356-3373.
35. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965, 8:338-353.
36. Ziarko W. Variable precision rough set model. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 1993, 46:39-59.