Prospective, blinded trial of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography positron emission tomography in staging primary and recurrent cancer of the head and neck

Journal of Laryngology and Otology

Volumn 124, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1274-1277

  O'Neill, J P ^a   Moynagh, M ^a   Kavanagh, E ^a   O'Dwyer, T ^a  

^a MATER PRIVATE HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Computerized Tomography; Head And Neck Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Positron Emission Tomography; Tumour Metastasis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; WHOLE BODY MRI;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; WHOLE BODY IMAGING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649917585     PISSN: 00222151     EISSN: 17485460     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215110001398     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Schmidt GP, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A. Whole-body MRI for the staging and follow-up of patients with metastasis. Eur J Radiol 2009;70:393-400
2. Garcia C, Flamen P. Role of positron emission tomography in the management of head and neck cancer in the molecular therapy era. Curr Opin Oncol 2008;20:275-9
3. Chen ZW, Zhu LJ, Hou QY, Wang QP, Jiang S, Feng H. Clinical application of positron-emission tomography for the identification of cervical nodal metastases of head and neck cancer compared with CT or MRI and clinical palpation [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2008;43:705-8
4. Ohno Y, Nogami M, Takenaka D, Yoshikawa T, Yoshimura M, Kotani Yet al. Whole body MR imaging vs. FDG-PET: Comparison of accuracy of M-stage diagnosis for lung cancer patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:498-509
5. Yi C, Shin K, Lee K. Non small cell lung cancer staging: Efficacy comparison of integrated PET-CT versus 3T whole-body MR imaging. Radiology 2008;248:632-42
6. Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Herzog P. High resolution whole body MRI tumor staging with the use of parallel imaging versus dual modality PET-CT: Experience of a 32-channel system. Invest Radiology 2005;40:743-53
7. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edn. Chicago: Springer, 2009
8. Balogova S, Perie S, Kerrou K, Grahek D, Montravers F, Angleard B et al. Prospective comparison of FDG and FET PET/CT in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol 2008;10:364-73
9. Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS. Whole-body dual modality PET-CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA 2003;290:3199-206
10. Ong SC, Schoder H, Lee NY, Patel SG, Carlson D, Fury M et al. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET-CT in assessing the neck after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregional advanced head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med 2008;49: 532-40