Gochnatia polymorpha (Less.) Cabrera (Asteraceae) changes in leaf structure due to differences in light and edaphic conditions;Gochnatia polymorpha (Less.) Cabrera modifica sua estrutura foliar devido a diferenças na luminosidade e condições edáficas

Acta Botanica Brasilica

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 605-612

  Rossatto, Davi Rodrigo ^a,b   Kolb, Rosana Marta ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Anatomical plasticity; Gallery forest; Leaf morphology; Neotropical savanna; Stomatal frequency

Indexed keywords

ASTERACEAE; CABRERA; GOCHNATIA POLYMORPHA;

EID: 78649916156     PISSN: 01023306     EISSN: 1677941X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-33062010000300002     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Abrams, M.D.; Kubiske, M.E. & Mostoller, S.A. 1994. Relating wet and dry year ecophysiology to leaf structure in contrasting temperate tree species. Ecology 75(1): 123-133.
2. Björkman, O. 1981. Pp. 57-107. Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange, O.L.; Nobel, P.S.; Osmond, C.B & Ziegler, H. (eds.). Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New York, Springer.
3. Boardman, N.K. 1977. Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 28: 355-377.
4. Catalan, C.A.N.; Vega, M.I.; Lopez, M.E.; Cuenca, M.R.; Gedris, T.E. & Herz, W. 2003. Coumarins and a kaurene from Gochnatia polymorpha from Paraguay. Biochemical systematics and ecology 31: 417-422.
5. Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York, Columbia. University Press.
6. Dias, J.; Pimenta, J.A.; Medri, M.E.; Boeger, M.R.T. & Freitas, C.T. 2007. Physiological aspects of sun and shade leaves of Litrhaea molleoides (Vell.) Engl. (Anacardiaceae). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 50(1): 91-99.
7. Durigan, G.; Bacic, M.C.; Franco, G.A.D.C. & Siqueira, M.F. 1999. Inventário florístico do cerrado na Estação Ecológica de Assis, SP. Hoehnea 26:149-172.
8. Durigan, G.; Melo, A.C.G.; Max, J.C.M.; Vilas Boas, O. & Contieri, W.A. 2003. Manual para recuperação da vegetação do cerrado. São Paulo, Páginas e Letras.
9. Durigan, G.; Baitello, J.B.; Franco, G.A.D.C. & Siqueira, M.F. 2004. Plantas do cerrado paulista: Imagens de uma paisagem ameaçada. São Paulo, Editora Páginas & Letras.
10. Ehleringer, J.R.; Björkmann, O. & Mooney, H.A. 1976. Leaf pubescence: effects on absorbance and photosynthesis in desert shrubs. Science 192: 376-377.
11. Ehleringer, J.R. & Bjorkamann, O. 1978. Pubescence and leaf spectral characteristics in a desert shrub, Encelia farinosa. Oecologia 37: 183-200.
12. Fahn, A. 1964. Some anatomical adaptations of desert plants. Phytomorphology 14: 93-102.
13. Fahn, A. 1986. Structural and functional properties of trichomes of xeromorphic leaves. Annals of Botany 57: 631-637.
14. Fahn, A. & Cutler, D. 1992. Xerophytes. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.
15. Feller, I.C. 1996. Effects of nutrient enrichment on leaf anatomy of dwarf Rhizophora mangle L. (Red mangrove). Biotropica 28: 13-22.
16. Furley, P.A. 1999. The nature and diversity of neotropical savanna vegetation with particular reference to the Brazilian cerrado. Global Ecology Biogeography 8: 223-241.
17. Furley, P.A. & Ratter, J.A. 1988. Soil resources and plant communities of the Central Brazilian cerrado and their development. Journal of Biogeography 15: 97-108.
18. Galmes, J.; Flexas, J.; Save, H. & Medrano, H. 2007. Water relation and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant Soil 290: 139-155.
19. Gianoli, E. & Gonzalez-Teuber, M. 2005. Environmental heterogeneity and population differentiation in plasticity to drought in Convolvulus chilensis (Convulvolaceae). Evolutionary Ecology 19: 603-613.
20. Givnish, T.J. 1984. Pp. 51-84. Leaf and canopy adaptations in tropical forests. In: Medina, E.; Mooney H.A. & Vasques-Yanes, C. (eds.) Physiological ecology of plants in the wet tropics. The Hague, Dr. W. Junk Publishers.
21. Gomes, B.Z.; Martins, F.R. & Tamashiro, J.Y. 2004. Estrutura do cerradão e da transição entre cerradão e floresta paludícola num fragmento da International Paper do Brasil Ltda., Em Brotas, SP. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 27(2): 249-262.
22. Gratani, L.; Covone, F. & Larcher, W. 2006. Leaf plasticity in response to light of three evergreen species of the Mediterranean maquis. Trees 20: 549-558.
23. Haridasan, M. 1992. Pp. 171-184. Observations on soils, foliar nutrient concentrations and floristic composition of cerrado sensu stricto and cerradão commuities in central Brazil. In: Furley, P.A.; Proctor A. & Ratter, J.A. (eds.). Nature and Dynamics of Forest-Savanna Boundaries. London, Chapman and Hall
24. Haridasan, M. 2001. Pp. 68-83. Nutrient cycling as a function of landscape and biotic characteristics in the cerrados of Central Brazil. In: M.E. McClain; R.L. Victorial & J.E. Richey (eds.). The biogeochemistry of the Amazon Basin. New York, Oxford University Press.
25. Hlwatika, C.N.M. & Bhat, R.B. 2002. An ecological interpretation of the difference in leaf anatomy and its plasticity in contrasting tree species in Orange Kloog, table Mountain, South Africa. Annals of Botany 89: 109-114.
26. Isanogle, I.T. 1944. Effects of controlled shading upon the development of leaf structure in two deciduous tree species. Ecology 25: 404-413.
27. Jackson, L.W.R. 1967. Relation of leaf structure to shade tolerance of dicotyledonous tree species. Forest Science 13(3): 321-323.
28. Juhász, C.E.P.; Cursi, P.R.; Cooper, M.; Oliveira, T.C. & Rodrigues, R.R. 2006. Soil water dynamics in a toposequence under Savanna Woodland (Cerradão) in Assis,Sp, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Solo 30: 401-412.
29. Klich, M.G.; Brevedan, R.E. & Villamil, S.C. 1997. Leaf anatomy and ultrastructure of Poa ligularis after defoliation and water strees. Proceedings of the 18th International Grassland Congress 1: 37-38.
30. Klich, M.G. 2000. Leaf variations in Elaeagnus angustifolia related to environmental heterogeneity. Environmental and Experimental Botany 44: 171-183.
31. Larcher, W. 2003. Physiological plant ecology. 4th New York, Springer.
32. Lorenzi, H. 2002. Brazilian trees: A guide to the identification and cultivation of brazilian native trees. Nova Odessa, Plantarum.
33. Mantuano, D.G.; Barros, C.F. & Scarano, F.R. 2006. Leaf anatomy variation within and between three "restinga" populations of Erythroxylum ovalifolium Peyr. (Erythroxylaceae) in Southeast Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 29(2): 209-215.
34. Medina, E.; Garcia, V. & Cuevas, E. 1990. Sclerophylly and oligotrophic environments: Relationships between leaf structure, mineral nutrition content, and drought resistance in tropical rain forests of the upper Rio Negro region. Biotropica 22(1): 51-64.
35. Mendonça, R.C.; Felfili, J.M.; Walter, B.M.T.; Silva Júnior, M.C.; Rezende, A.V.; Filgueiras, T.S. & Nogueira, P.E. 1998. Pp. 289-556. Flora Vascular do Cerrado. In: Sano, S.M. & Almeida, S.P. (Eds.). Cerrado: ambiente e flora. Planaltina, EMBRAPA-CPAC.
36. Melo-de-Pinna, G.F.A. 2004. Anatomia foliar de Richterago Kuntze (Mutisieae, Asteraceae). Acta Botanica Brasilica 18(3): 591-600.
37. Milan, P.; Hayashi, A.H. & Appezzato-da Glória, B. 2006. Comparative leaf morphology and anatomy of three Asteraceae species. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 49: 135-144.
38. Oliveira Filho, A.T. & Ratter, J.A. 2002. Pp. 91-120. Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the Cerrado Biome. In: Oliveira, P.S. & Marquis, R.J. (eds.). The Cerrados of Brazil. New York, Columbia University Press.
39. Paiva, E.A.S.; Isaias, R.M.S.; Vale, F.H.A. & Queiroz, C.G.S. 2003. The influence of light intensity on anatomical structure and pigment contents of Tradescantia pallida (Rose) Hunt. cv. purpurea Boom (Commelinaceae) leaves. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 46: 617-624.
40. Pallardy, S.G. 1981. Pp. 56-78. Closely related woody plants. In: T.T. Kozlowski (ed.). Water deficits and plant growth, Vol. VI. New York, Academic Press.
41. Pearce, D.W.; Millard, S.; Bray, D.F. & Rood, S.R. 2006. Stomatal characteristics of riparian poplar species in a semi-arid environment. Tree Physiology 26: 211-218.
42. Ratter, J.A. 1992. Pp. 417-429. Transitions between cerrado and forest vegetation in Brazil. In: Furley, P.A.; Proctor, A. & Ratter, J.A. Nature and Dynamics of Forest-Savanna Boundaries. London, Chapman and Hall.
43. Ratter, J.A.; Ribeiro, J.F. & Bridgewater, S. 1997. The Brazilian cerrado vegetation and threats to its biodiversity. Annals of Botany 80: 223-230.
44. Sacilotto, A.C.B.C.; Vichnewski, W. & Herz, W. (1997), Ent-kaurene diterpenes from Gochnatia polymorpha. Phytochemistry 44(4): 659-661.
45. Sajo, M.G. & Menezes, N.L. 1994. Considerações sobre a anatomia foliar de espéies de Vernonia Screb. (Compositae) da Serra do Cipó, MG. Naturalia 19: 173-183.
46. Scheiner, S.M. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 35-68.
47. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente. 1997. Estação Experimental e Ecológica de Assis. São Paulo, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente.
48. Shields, L.M. 1950. Leaf xeromorphy as related to physiological and structural influences. Botanical Reviews 16: 399-477.
49. Smith, W.K.; Vogelmann, T.C.; De Lucia, E.H.; Bell, D.T. & Shepherd, K.A. (1997), Leaf form and photosynthesis. Bio-Science 47: 785-793.
50. Stearns, A.D. 1989. The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. Bioscence 39: 436-445.
51. Tabanez, M.F.; Durigan, G.; Keuroghlian, A. & Barbosa, A.F. 2005. Plano de manejo da Estação Ecológica dos Caetetus. IF Série Registros 29: 1-104.
52. Turner, I.M. 1994. Sclerophylly: primarily protective? Functional Ecology 8: 669-675.
53. Via, S. 1993. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: target or by-product of selection in a variable environment. The American Naturalist 142: 352-365.
54. Vogelmann, T.C. 1993. Plant tissue optics. Annual Review Plant Physiological and Plant Molecular biology 44: 231-251.
55. Weyers, J.D.B. & Meidner, H. 1990. Methods in stomatal research. London, Longman.