Treatment of recurrent urinary incontinence after artificial urinary sphincter placement using the advance male sling

Urology

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1321-1324

  Christine, Brian ^a   Knoll, L Dean ^b  

^a Alabama Research Center   (United States)

^b Center for Urological Treatment and Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER SPHINCTER PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFECTION RISK; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; RECURRENT DISEASE; SUBURETHRAL SLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE INCONTINENCE;

AGED; ATROPHY; HUMANS; INCONTINENCE PADS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; URETHRA; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY SPHINCTER, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 78649908290     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.086     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. W. Catalona, G. Carvalhal, and D. Mager Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retorpubic prostatectomies J Urol. 162 1999 433 438
2. J. Stanford, Z. Feng, and A. Hamilton Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer JAMA. 283 2000 354 360
3. D. Penson, D. McLerran, and Z. Feng 5 Year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study J Urol. 173 2005 1701 1705
4. S. Litwiller, K. Kim, and P. Fone Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success J Urol. 156 1996 1975 1980
5. A. Kumar, E. Litt, and K. Ballert Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence-what do patients choose? J Urol. 181 2009 1231 1235
6. H. Lai, E. Hsu, and B. Teh 13 Years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine J Urol. 177 2007 1021 1025
7. A. Saffarian, K. Walsh, and I. Walsh Urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter placement: is cuff downsizing effective? J Urol. 169 2003 567 569
8. D. DiMarco, and D. Elliott Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence J Urol. 170 2003 1252 1254
9. R. O'Connor, M. Lyon, and M. Guralnick Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence Urology. 71 2008 90 93
10. P. Rehder, and C. Gozzi Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy Eur Urol. 52 2007 860 866
11. C. Gozzi, A. Becker, and R. Bauer Early results of transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy Eur Urol. 54 2008 960 961
12. G. Webster, M. Kennelly, and K. McCammon A new minimally invasive treatment for male stress urinary incontinence: the AdVance male sling, one year data from a multicenter prospective study J Urol Suppl. 181 2009 592
13. G. Raj, A. Peterson, and K. Toh Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter J Urol. 173 2005 1242 1245
14. M. Guralnick, E. Miller, and K. Toh Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy J Urol. 167 2002 2075 2078
15. A. Silverstein, G. Henry, and B. Evans Biofilm formation on clinically noninfected penile prostheses J Urol. 176 2006 1008 1011
16. G. Henry, C. Carson, and S. Wilson Revision washout decreases implant capsule tissue culture positivity: a multicenter study J Urol. 179 2008 186 190