Iteratively re-weighted bi-cubic spline representation of corneal topography and its comparison to the standard methods;Nachbildung von Korneatopographien durch die iterativ gewichtete bikubische Spline Methode und ein Vergleich mit Standardmethoden

Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 287-298

  Zhu, Zhongxia ^a,b   Janunts, Edgar ^d   Eppig, Timo ^d   Sauer, Tomas ^c   Langenbucher, Achim ^a,b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b INTERNATIONAL MAX PLANCK RESEARCH SCHOOL FOR OPTICS AND IMAGING   (Germany)

^c JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMETRY; KERATOMILEUSIS; KERNEL METHOD; LENS IMPLANT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MYOPIA; PUPIL; PUPILLOGRAPHY; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; SIMULATION;

ASTIGMATISM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORNEA; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REFRACTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 78649907616     PISSN: 09393889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2010.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lindsay R., Smith G., Atchison D. Descriptors of corneal shape. Optom Vis Sci 1998, 75:156-158.
2. Norrby S., Piers P., Campbell C., van der Mooren M. Model eyes for evaluation of intraocular lenses. Appl Opt 2007, 46:6595-6605.
3. Rabbetts R.B. Bennett and Rabbetts' Clinical Visual Optics 2007, Butterworth Heinemann Elvesier, Amsterdam. 4th edition.
4. Navarro R., Santamaría J., Bescós J. Accommodation-dependent model of the human eye with aspherics. J Opt Soc Am A 1985, 2:1273-1280.
5. Liou H.-L., Brennan N.A. Anatomically accurate, finite model eye for optical modeling. J Opt Soc Am A 1997, 14:1684-1695.
6. Popiolek-Masajada A, Kasprzak H, T. A new schematic eye model incorporating accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76:720-7.
7. Schwiegerling J., Greivenkamp J., Miller J. Representation of videokeratoscopic height data with Zernike polynomials. J Opt Soc Am A 1995, 12:2105-2113.
8. Schwiegerling J., Greivenkamp J. Using corneal height maps and polynomial decomposition to determine corneal aberrations. Optom Vis Sci 1997, 74:906-916.
9. Navarro R., González L., Hernández J. Optics of the average normal cornea from general and canonical representations of its surface topography. J Opt Soc Am A 2006, 23:219-232.
10. Turuwhenua J., Henderson J. A novel low-order method for recovery of the corneal shape. Optom Vis Sci 2004, 81:863-871.
11. Turuwhenua J. An improved low order method for corneal reconstruction. Optom Vis Sci 2008, 3:E211-E218.
12. Halstead M., Barsky B., Klein S., Mandell R. A spline surface algorithm for reconstruction of corneal topography from a videokeratographic reflection pattern. Optom Vis Sci 1995, 72:821-827.
13. Halstead M., Barsky B., Klein S., Mandell R. Reconstructing curved surfaces from specular reflection patterns using spline surface fitting of normals. 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques 1996, 335-342.
14. Chu L., Barsky B., Klein S. Cylindrical Coordinate Representations for Modeling Surfaces of the Cornea and Contact Lenses. International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 1999, 98-113. IEEE CS Press.
15. Applegate R., Thibos L., Twa M., Sarver E. Importance of fixation, pupil center, and reference axis in ocular wavefront sensing, videokeratography, and retinal image quality. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009, 35:139-152.
16. Langenbucher A., Viestenz A., Brünner H., Seitz B. Ray tracing through a schematic eye containing second-order (quadric) surfaces using 4 x 4 matrix notation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006, 26:180-188.
17. Thibos L., Applegate R., Schwiegerling J., Webb R. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J Refract Surg 2002, 18:652-660.
18. Sicam V., Coppens J., van den Berg T., van der Heijde R. Corneal surface reconstruction algorithm that uses Zernike polynomial representation. J Opt Soc Am A 2004, 21:1300-1306.
19. Corbin J.A., Klein S., Pol Cvd. Measuring effects of refractive surgery on corneas using Taylor series polynomials. SPIE conference on ophthalmic technologies IX; San Jose, California 1999, 46-52. SPIE.
20. Mandell R.B., Chiang S.C., Klein S.A. Location of the major corneal reference points. Optom Vis Sci 1995, 72:776-784.
21. Vos F., Spoelder H., Germans D., Hofman R., Bal H. Real-time, adaptive measurement of corneal shapes. Comput Sci Eng 2002, 66-76.
22. Navarro R., González L., Hernández-Matamoros J. On the prediction of optical aberrations by personalized eye models. Optom Vis Sci 2006, 83:371-381.
23. Smolek M., Klyce S. Zernike polynomial fitting fails to represent all visually significant corneal aberrations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003, 44:4676-4681.
24. Smolek M., Klyce S. Goodness-of-prediction of Zernike polynomial fitting to corneal surfaces. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005, 31:2350-2355.
25. Langenbucher A., Sauer T., Seitz B. Wavelet analysis for corneal topographic surface characterization. Curr Eye Res 2002, 24:409-421.