Toward an ecological perspective of resident teaching clinic

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 771-778

  Smith, C Scott ^a,b   Francovich, Chris ^a,c   Morris, Magdalena ^a,d   Hill, William ^a   Langlois Winkle, Francine ^a   Rupper, Randall ^e,f   Roth, Craig ^e,g   Wheeler, Stephanie ^b,e   Vo, Anthony ^h,i  

^a Boise VA Medical Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c GONZAGA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Apollo College   (United States)

^e VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^h VA LONG BEACH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Activity theory; Communities of practice; Complex adaptive systems; Ecological psychology; Interaction; Narrative

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; COMMUNICATION; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LEARNING; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78649905714     PISSN: 13824996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-008-9134-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. D. (2000). Harnessing complexity. Organizational implications of a scientific frontier. New York: Basic Books.
2. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
3. Engström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
4. Engström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63-93. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1008648532192.
5. Engström, Y., Engström, R., & Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaikin, M. Jedegaard & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural historical approaches. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
6. Fraser, S. W., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). Coping with complexity: Educating for capability. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 323, 799-803. doi: 10. 1136/bmj. 323. 7316. 799.
7. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houton Mifflin.
8. Greenhalgh, T., et al. (2004). How to spread good ideas. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R& D (NCCSDO), United Kingdom.
9. Grimshaw, J. M., et al. (2001). Changing patient behavior. An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Medical Care, 39(8), II-2-II-48.
10. Grol, R., Baker, R., & Moss, F. (2004). Quality improvement research. London: BMJ Books.
11. Hodges, B. H., & Baron, R. M. (1992). Values as constraints on affordances: Perceiving and acting properly. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(3), 263-294. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1468-5914. 1992. tb00220. x.
12. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Leont'ev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliff, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
14. Leykum, L. K., et al. (2007). Organizational interventions employing principles of complexity science have improved outcomes for patients with Type II diabetes. Implementation Science: IS, 2, 28. doi: 10. 1186/1748-5908-2-28.
15. McDaniel, R. R., & Driebe, D. J. (Eds.). (2005). Uncertainty and surprise in complex systems. Berlin: Springer.
16. McGee, J. H., & Begg, M. (2008). What medical educators need to know about "Web 2. 0". Medical Teacher, 30, 164-169. doi: 10. 1080/01421590701881673.
17. Mead, G. H. (1962). In C. W. Morris (Ed.), Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Miller, W. L., Crabtree, B. F., McDaniel, R., & Strange, K. C. (1998). Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory. The Journal of Family Practice, 46(5), 369-376.
19. Plsek, P. E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 323, 625-628. doi: 10. 1136/bmj. 323. 7313. 625.
20. Plsek, P. E., & Wilson, T. (2001). Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organizations. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 323, 746-749. doi: 10. 1136/bmj. 323. 7313. 625.
21. Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Reed, E. S. (1998). From soul to mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
23. Schoggen, P. (1989). Behavior settings. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
24. Shaw, P. (2002). Changing conversations in organizations. A complexity approach to change. London: Routledge.
25. Stacey, R. D. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organizations. London: Routledge.
26. Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management. London: Routledge.
27. Suchman, A. L. (2006). A new foundation for relationship-centered care. Complex responsive processes of relating. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(suppl), s40-s44. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1525-1497. 2006. 00308. x.
28. Vygotsky, L. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139-145.
31. Wilson, T., & Holt, T. (2001). Complexity and clinical care. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 323, 685-688. doi: 10. 1136/bmj. 323. 7314. 685.