Soil capacitance sensors and stem dendrometers. useful tools for irrigation scheduling of commercial orchards?;Las sondas de capacitancia y los dendrómetros. ¿Herramientas para la programación del riego en agricultura convencional?

Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 8, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2010, Pages

  Bonet, L ^a   Ferrer, P ^a   Castel, J R ^a   Intrigliolo, D S ^a  

^a INSTITUTO VALENCIANO DE INVESTIGACIONES AGRARIAS IVIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Citrus; Plum; Regulated deficit irrigation; Trunk diameter variations; Water stress

Indexed keywords

CITRUS; DIOSPYROS; PRUNUS DOMESTICA; PRUNUS PERSICA; PRUNUS PERSICA NUCIPERSICA;

EID: 78649883825     PISSN: 1695971X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ABRISQUETA J.M., MOUNZER O., ÁLVAREZ S., CONEJERO W., GARCÍA-ORELLANA Y., TAPIA L.M., VERA J., ABRISQUETA I., RUIZ-SÁNCHEZ M.C., 2008. Root dynamics of peach trees submitted to partial rootzone drying and continuous deficit irrigation. Agric Water Manage 95, 959-967.
2. ALLEN R.G., PEREIRA L.S., RAES D., SMITH M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig and Drain paper No 56. Rome, Italy.
3. ANDREU L., HOPMANS J.W., SCHWANKL L.J., 1997. Spatial and temporal distribution of soil water balance for a dripirrigated almond tree. Agric Water Manage 35, 123-146.
4. ANNANDALE J.G., STOCKLE C.O., 1994. Fluctuation of crop evapotranspiration coefficients with weather. A sensitivity analysis. Irrigation Sci 15, 1-7.
5. BUSSI C., HUGUET J.G., BESSER J., GIRARD T., 1999. Irrigation scheduling of an early maturing peach cultivar using tensiometers and diurnal changes in stem diameter. Fruits 54, 57-66.
6. CONEJERO W., ALARCÓN J.J., GARCÍA-ORELLANA Y., NICOLÁS E., TORRECILLAS A., 2007. Evaluation of sap flow and trunk diameter sensors used for irrigation scheduling in early maturing peach trees Tree Physiol 27, 1753-1759.
7. CONSOLI S., O'CONNELL N., SNYDER R., 2006. Measurement of light interception by navel orange orchard canopies: Case study of Lindsay, California. J Irr Drain Engn 132, 9-20.
8. EVETT S.R., 2000. Some aspects of time domain reflectometry, neutron scattering, and capacitance methods for soil water content measurement. In: FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. Comparison of Soil Water Measurement using the Neutron Scattering, Time Domain Reflectometry, and Capacitance Methods. IAEA-TECDOC-1137, 5-49.
9. EVETT S.R., SCHWARTZ R.C., 2010. Comments on «J. Vera et al., Soil water balance trial involving capacitance and neutron probe measurements» [Agric Water Manage 96, 905-911]. Agric Water Manage 97, 182-184.
10. EVETT S.R., TOLK J.A., HOWELL T.A., 2006. Soil profile water content determination: sensor accuracy, axial response, calibration, temperature dependence, and precision. Vadose Zone J 5, 894-907.
11. EVETT S.R., SCHWARTZ R.C., TOLK J.A., HOWELL T.A., 2009. Soil profile water content determination: spatiotemporal variability of electromagnetic and neutron probe sensors in access tubes. Vadose Zone J 8, 1-16.
12. FERERES E., GOLDHAMER D.A., 1990. Deciduous fruit and nut trees. In: Irrigation of agricultural crops (Stewart B.A., Nielsen D.R., eds). ASA Madison, Wis, USA. Mon. 30. pp. 987-1017.
13. FERERES E., GOLDHAMER D.A., 2003. Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees. J Hort Sci Biotech 78, 139-144.
14. FERNÁNDEZ J.E., CUEVAS M.V., 2010. Irrigation scheduling from stem diameter variations. A review. Agric For Meteor 150, 135-151.
15. GARCÍA-ORELLANA Y., RUIZ-SÁNCHEZ M.C., ALARCÓN J.J., CONEJERO W., ORTUÑO M.F., NICOLÁS E., TORRECILLAS A., 2007. Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using maximum daily trunk shrinkage for irrigation heduling in lemon trees. Agric Water Manage 89, 167-171.
16. GOLDHAMER D.A., FERERES E., 2001. Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements. Irrigation Sci 20, 15-125.
17. GOLDHAMER D.A., FERERES E., 2004. Irrigation scheduling of almond trees with trunk diameter sensors. Irrigation Sci 23, 11-19.
18. INTRIGLIOLO D.S., CASTEL J.R., 2004. Continuous measurement of plant and soil water status for irrigation scheduling in plum. Irrigation Sci 23, 93-102.
19. INTRIGLIOLO D.S., CASTEL J.R., 2005. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on growth and yield of young Japanese plum trees. J Hortic Sci Biotech 80, 177-182.
20. INTRIGLIOLO D.S., CASTEL J.R., 2006a. Performance of various water stress indicators for prediction of fruit size response to deficit irrigation in plum. Agric Water Manage 83, 173-180.
21. INTRIGLIOLO D.S., CASTEL J.R., 2006b. Usefulness of diurnal trunk shrinkage as a water stress indicator in plum trees. Tree Physiol 26, 303-311.
22. INTRIGLIOLO D.S., GONZÁLEZ-ALTOZANO P., GASQUE M., CASTEL J.R., 2008. Efectividad y transferibilidad de la relación potencial hídrico de tallo-déficit de presión de vapor entre distintos huertos de cítricos de la Comunidad Valenciana. Proc IX Symposium Ibérico de Relaciones Hídricas en las Plantas. Lloret de Mar, 14-17 October. pp. 85-89. [In Spanish].
23. JOHNSON R.S., HANDLEY D.F., 2000. Using water stress to control vegetative growth and productivity of temperate fruit trees. HortScience 35, 1048-50.
24. LEIB B.G., JABRO J.D., MATHEWS G.R., 2003. Field evaluation and performance comparison of soil moisture sensors. Soil Sci 168, 396-408.
25. NAOR A., 2006. Irrigation scheduling and evaluation of tree water status in deciduous orchards. Hort Rev 32, 111-166.
26. ORTUÑO M.F., GARCÍA-ORELLANA Y., CONEJERO W., RUIZ-SÁNCHEZ M.C., MOUNZER O., ALARCÓN J.J., TORRECILLAS A., 2006. Relationships between climatic variables and sap flow, stem water potential and maxi- mum daily trunk shrinkage in lemon trees. Plant Soil 279, 229-242.
27. ORTUÑO M.F., CONEJERO W., MORENO F., MORIANA A., INTRIGLIOLO D.S., BIEL C., MELLISHO C.D., PÉREZ-PASTOR A., DOMINGO R., RUIZ-SÁNCHEZ M.C., CASADESUS J., BONANY J., TORRECILLAS A., 2010. Could trunk diameter sensors be used in woody crops for irrigation scheduling? A review of current knowledge and future perspectives. Agric Water Manage 97, 1-11.
28. SADRAS V.O., VILLALOBOS F., FERERES E., 1993. Leaf expansion in field grown sunflower in response to soil and leaf water status. Agr J 85, 564-670.
29. SHACKEL K.A., AHMADI H., BIASI W., BUCHNER R.,GOLDHAMER D., GURUSINGHE S., HASEY J., KESTER D., KRUEGER B., LAMPINEN B. et al., 1997. Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees. HortTechnol 7, 23-29.
30. STARR J.L., PALTINEANU I.C., 1998a. Soil water dynamics using multisensor capacitance probes in nontraff ic interrows of corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62, 114-122.
31. STARR J.L., PALTINEANU I.C., 1998b. Real-time soil water dynamics over large areas using multisensor capacitance probes and monitoring system. Soil Till Res 47, 43-49.
32. TURNER N.C., 1981. Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant Soil 58, 339-366.
33. VÉLEZ J.E., INTRIGLIOLO D.S., CASTEL J.R., 2007. Scheduling deficit irrigation of citrus trees with maximum daily trunk shrinkage. Agric Water Manage 90, 197-204.
34. VERA J., MOUNZER O., RUIZ-SÁNCHEZ M.C., ABRISQUETA I., TAPIA L.M., ABRISQUETA J.M., 2009. Soil water balance trial involving capacitance and neutron probe measurements. Agric Water Manage 96, 905-911.