Retrospect and prospect: Information systems research in the last and next 25 years

Journal of Information Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 336-348

  Lee, Allen S ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

information; organization; professions; relevance; system; theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649872117     PISSN: 02683962     EISSN: 14664437     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jit.2010.24     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1978). Theory in Practice: Increasing professional effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Baskerville, R.L. and Myers, M.D. (2004). Special Issue on Action Research in Information Systems: Making IS research relevant to practice - Foreword, MIS Quarterly 28(3): 329-335.
3. Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
4. Checkland, P. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action: A 30-year retrospective, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35(8): 982-1003.
6. Emery, F.E. and Trist, E.L. (1969). Socio-technical Systems, in F.E. Emery (ed.) Systems Thinking: Selected readings, Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 281-296.
7. Gregor, S. (2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 30(3): 611-642.
8. Jones, M. and Karsten, H. (2008). Giddenss Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly 32(1): 127-157.
9. Jönsson, S. (1991). Action Research, in H.-E. Nissen, R. Hirschheim and H.K. Klein (eds.) Information Systems Research: Contemporary approaches & emergent traditions, New York: Elsevier Science, pp. 371-396.
10. Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation, New York: Basic Books.
11. Lee, A.S. (2004). Thinking about Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, in J. Mingers and L. Willcocks (eds.) Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-26.
12. Lee, A.S. and Demetis, D.S. (2009). Putting the Systems Back in Information Systems, Working paper.
13. Lee, A.S. and Hubona, G.S. (2009). A Scientific Basis for Rigor in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly 33(2): 237-262.
14. Little, D.E. (1999). Philosophy of the Social Sciences, in R. Audi (ed.) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 704-706.
15. McKinney, E.H. and Yoos, C.J. (2010). Information About Information: A taxonomy of views, MIS Quarterly 34(2): 329-344.
16. Mills, C.W. (1977). The Sociological Imagination, New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Parry, R. (2007) Episteme and Techne, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, [www document] http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/episteme-techne/ (accessed 9th May 2010).
18. Sarker, S. and Valacich, J.S. (forthcoming). A Non-Reductionist Approach to Studying Technology Adoption by Groups, MIS Quarterly, [www document] Abstract available at SarkerValacich.html (accessed 6th July 2010).
19. Schutz, A. (1962-66). Collected Papers, The Hague: M. Nijoff.
20. Simon, H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Van Maanen, J. (1979). The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography, Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4): 539-550.
22. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory, New York: G. Braziller.
23. Willcocks, L.P. and Lee, A.S. (eds.) 2008 Currents in Information Systems, London: SAGE.