The role of the cytoskeleton in volume regulation and beading transitions in PC12 neurites

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3571-3579

  Fernández, Pablo ^a   Pullarkat, Pramod A ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b RAMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649860495     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Weiss, T. 1996. Cellular Biophysics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Lang, F., G. L. Busch, D. Häussinger. 1998. Functional significance of cell volume regulatory mechanisms. Physiol. Rev. 78:247-306. (Pubitemid 28070981)
3. Hernandez, J., and E. Cristina. 1998. Modeling cell volume regulation in nonexcitable cells: the roles of the Na+ pump and of cotransport systems. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 275:C1067-C1080.
4. MacKnight, A. D. C. 1987. Volume maintenance in isoosmotic conditions. In Cell Volume Control: Fundamental and Comparative Aspects in Animal Cells. R. Gilles, A. Kleinzeller, and L. Bolis, editors. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 3-43.
5. Bray, D. 2001. Cell Movements: From Molecules to Motility, 2nd Ed. Garland Publishing, New York.
6. Alberts, B., D. Bray, J. D. Watson. 1994. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 3rd Ed. Garland Publishing, New York.
7. Janmey, P. A. 1998. The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiol. Rev. 78:763-781.
8. Fabry, B., G. N. Maksym, J. J. Fredberg. 2001. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87:148102.
9. Thoumine, O., and A. Ott. 1997. Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. J. Cell Sci. 110:2109-2116.
10. Fernández, P., P. A. Pullarkat, and A. Ott. 2006. A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 90:3796-3805.
11. Pullarkat, P. A., P. A. Fernández, and A. Ott. 2007. Rheological properties of the Eukaryotic cell cytoskeleton. Phys. Rep. 449:29-53.
12. Bernal, R., P. A. Pullarkat, and F. Melo. 2007. Mechanical properties of axons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99:018301.
13. Henson, J. H. 1999. Relationships between the actin cytoskeleton and cell volume regulation. Microsc. Res. Tech. 47:155-162.
14. Kleinzeller, A. 1965. The volume regulation in some animal cells. Arch. Biol. (Liege). 76:217-232.
15. Cantiello, H. F. 1997. Role of actin filament organization in cell volume and ion channel regulation. J. Exp. Zool. 279:425-435.
16. Mills, J. 1987. The cell cytoskeleton: possible role in volume control. In Cell Volume Control: Fundamental and Comparative Aspects in Animal Cells. R. Gilles., A. Kleinzeller., and L. Bolis., editors. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 75-101.
17. Strieter, J., J. L. Stephenson, A. M. Weinstein. 1990. Volume-activated chloride permeability can mediate cell volume regulation in a mathematical model of a tight epithelium. J. Gen. Physiol. 96: 319-344.
18. Strange, K. 2004. Cellular volume homeostasis. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 28:155-159.
19. Downey, G. P., S. Grinstein, C. K. Chan. 1995. Volume regulation in leukocytes: requirement for an intact cytoskeleton. J. Cell. Physiol. 163:96-104.
20. Pullarkat, P. A., P. Dommersnes, A. Ott. 2006. Osmotically driven shape transformations in axons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96:048104.
21. Wan, X., J. A. Harris, and C. E. Morris. 1995. Responses of neurons to extreme osmomechanical stress. J. Membr. Biol. 145:21-31.
22. Heubusch, P., C. Y. Jung, and F. A. Green. 1985. The osmotic response of human erythrocytes and the membrane cytoskeleton. J. Cell. Physiol. 122:266-272.
23. Mahaffy, R. E., S. Park, C. K. Shih. 2004. Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 86:1777-1793.
24. Zhou, E. H., X. Trepat, J. J. Fredberg. 2009. Universal behavior of the osmotically compressed cell and its analogy to the colloidal glass transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106:10632-10637.
25. Suchyna, T. M., S. R. Besch, and F. Sachs. 2004. Dynamic regulation of mechanosensitive channels: capacitance used to monitor patch tension in real time. Phys. Biol. 1:1-18.
26. D'Alessandro, M., D. Russell, E. B. Lane. 2002. Keratin mutations of epidermolysis bullosa simplex alter the kinetics of stress response to osmotic shock. J. Cell Sci. 115:4341-4351.
27. Cornet, M., E. Delpire, and R. Gilles. 1988. Relations between cell volume control, microfilaments and microtubules networks in T2 and PC12 cultured cells. J. Physiol. (Paris). 83:43-49.
28. Light, D. B., A. J. Attwood, N. L. Baumann. 2003. Cell swelling increases intracellular calcium in Necturus erythrocytes. J. Cell Sci. 116:101-109.
29. Arora, P. D., K. J. Bibby, and C. A. McCulloch. 1994. Slow oscillations of free intracellular calcium ion concentration in human fibroblasts responding to mechanical stretch. J. Cell. Physiol. 161:187-200.
30. Guilak, F., R. A. Zell, H. J. Donahue. 1999. Mechanically induced calcium waves in articular chondrocytes are inhibited by gadolinium and amiloride. J. Orthop. Res. 17:421-429.
31. Kolodney, M. S., and E. L. Elson. 1995. Contraction due to microtubule disruption is associated with increased phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:10252-10256.
32. Greene, L. A., and A. S. Tischler. 1976. Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 73:2424-2428.
33. Jacobs, J. R., and J. K. Stevens. 1986. Changes in the organization of the neuritic cytoskeleton during nerve growth factor-activated differentiation of PC12 cells: a serial electron microscopic study of the development and control of neurite shape. J. Cell Biol. 103:895-906.
34. Markin, V. S., D. L. Tanelian, S. Ochs. 1999. Biomechanics of stretch-induced beading. Biophys. J. 76:2852-2860.
35. Ochs, S., R. Pourmand, and R. A. Jersild, Jr. 1996. Origin of beading constrictions at the axolemma: presence in unmyelinated axons and after β,β'-iminodipropionitrile degradation of the cytoskeleton. Neuroscience. 70:1081-1096.
36. Drexler, H. G., W. Dirks, C. C. Uphoff. 2001. DSMZ Catalogue of Human and Animal Cell Lines, 8th Ed. Braunschweig, Germany.
37. Greene, L., M. Sobeih, and K. Teng. 1991. Methodologies for the culture and experimental use of the PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cell line. In Culturing Nerve Cells. G. Banker, and K. Goslin, editors. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 207-226.
38. De Brabander, M. J., R. M. Van de Veire, P. A. Janssen. 1976. The effects of methyl (5-(2-thienylcarbonyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl) carbamate, (R 17934; NSC 238159), a new synthetic antitumoral drug interfering with microtubules, on mammalian cells cultured in vitro. Cancer Res. 36:905-916.
39. Straight, A. F., A. Cheung, T. J. Mitchison. 2003. Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II Inhibitor. Science. 299:1743-1747.
40. Maric, K., B. Wiesner, W. Rosenthal. 2001. Cell volume kinetics of adherent epithelial cells measured by laser scanning reflection microscopy: determination of water permeability changes of renal principal cells. Biophys. J. 80:1783-1790.
41. Huster, D., A. J. Jin, K. Gawrisch. 1997. Water permeability of polyunsaturated lipid membranes measured by 17° NMR. Biophys. J. 73:855-864.
42. Lúcio, A. D., R. A. Santos, and O. N. Mesquita. 2003. Measurements and modeling of water transport and osmoregulation in a single kidney cell using optical tweezers and videomicroscopy. Phys. Rev. E. 68:041906.
43. van Hoek, A. N., M. D. de Jong, and C. H. van Os. 1990. Effects of dimethylsulfoxide and mercurial sulfhydryl reagents on water and solute permeability of rat kidney brush border membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1030:203-210.
44. Fernández, P. 2006. Mechanics of living cells: nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts and shape instabilities in axons. PhD thesis. Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
45. Blumenfeld, L. A., and A. N. Tikhonov. 1994. Biophysical Thermodynamics of Intracellular Processes: Molecular Machines of the Living Cell. Springer, Berlin.
46. Ochs, S., R. A. Jersild, Jr., C. G. Potter. 1994. The beaded form of myelinated nerve fibers. Neuroscience. 61:361-372.
47. Kilinc, D., G. Gallo, and K. A. Barbee. 2008. Mechanically-induced membrane poration causes axonal beading and localized cytoskeletal damage. Exp. Neurol. 212:422-430.
48. Bernal, R., F. Melo, and P. A. Pullarkat. 2009. Drag force as a tool to test the active mechanical response of PC12 neurites. Biophys. J. 98:515-523.
49. Fernández, P., and A. Ott. 2008. Single cell mechanics: stress stiffening and kinematic hardening. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100:238102.
50. Fernández, P., L. Heymann, ., P. A. Pullarkat. 2007. Shear rheology of a cell monolayer. N. J. Phys. 9:419.
51. Rotsch, C., and M. Radmacher. 2000. Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys. J. 78:520-535.
52. Stamenović, D., S. M. Mijailovich, N. Wang. 2002. Cell prestress. II. Contribution of microtubules. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 282:C617-C624.
53. Haga, H., S. Sasaki, T. Sambongi. 2000. Elasticity mapping of living fibroblasts by AFM and immunofluorescence observation of the cytoskeleton. Ultramicroscopy. 82:253-258.