ENFORCe: A system for ensuring formal correctness of high-level programs

Electronic Communications of the EASST

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Azab, Karl ^a   Habel, Annegret ^a   Pennemann, Karl Heinz ^a   Zuckschwerdt, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Correctness; Formal verification; High level programs; Weak adhesive HLR categories; Weakest preconditions

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649858086     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18632122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14279/tuj.eceasst.1.82.60     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. B. Becker, D. Beyer, H. Giese, F. Klein, D. Schilling. Symbolic invariant verification for systems with dynamic structural adaptation. In Proc. of the 28th int. conference on Software engineering (ICSE'06). Pp. 72-81. ACM Press, 2006
2. P. Baldan, A. Corradini, B. König, B. König. Verifying a Behavioural Logic for Graph Transformation Systems. In Proc. of COMETA '03. ENTCS 104, pp. 5-24. Elsevier, 2004
3. S. Burmester, H. Giese, J. Niere, M. Tichy, J. P.Wadsack, R.Wagner, L.Wendehals, A. Zündorf. Tool integration at the meta-model level: the Fujaba approach. Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT) 6(3):203-218, 2004
4. G. Busatto. GraJ: A System for Executing Graph Programs in Java. Technical report 3/04, University of Oldenburg, 2004. Available at [Uni]
5. H. Ehrig, K. Ehrig, A. Habel, K.-H. Pennemann. Theory of Constraints and Application Conditions: From Graphs to High-Level Structures. Fundamenta Informaticae 74:135-166, 2006
6. H. Ehrig, K. Ehrig, U. Prange, G. Taentzer. Fundamentals of Algebraic Graph Transformation. EATCS Monographs of Theoretical Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006
7. R. Geiß, V. Batz, D. Grund, S. Hack, A. M. Szalkowski. GrGen: A fast SPO-based graph rewriting tool. In Graph Transformations (ICGT'06). LNCS 4178, pp. 383-397. Springer, 2006
8. A. Habel, K.-H. Pennemann. Nested Constraints and Application Conditions for High-Level Structures. In Formal Methods in Software and System Modeling. LNCS 3393, pp. 293-308. Springer, 2005
9. A. Habel, K.-H. Pennemann. Satisfiability of High-Level Conditions. In Graph Transformations (ICGT'06). LNCS 4178, pp. 430-444. Springer, 2006
10. A. Habel, K.-H. Pennemann, A. Rensink. Weakest Preconditions for High-Level Programs. In Graph Transformations (ICGT'06). LNCS 4178, pp. 445-460. Springer, 2006. A long version is available as technical report at [Uni]
11. R. Heckel, A. Wagner. Ensuring Consistency of Conditional Graph Grammars-A Constructive Approach. In SEGRAGRA'95. ENTCS 2, pp. 95-104. 1995
12. B. König, V. Kozioura. Augur 2-A New Version of a Tool for the Analysis of Graph Transformation Systems. In Proc. Workshop on Graph Transformation and Visual Modeling Techniques (GT-VMT'06). ENTCS. Elsevier, 2006. To appear
13. H. Kastenberg, A. Rensink. Model Checking Dynamic States in GROOVE. InModel Checking Software (SPIN). LNCS 3925, pp. 299-305. Springer, 2006
14. M. Lohmann, G. Engels, R. Heckel, S. Sauer. Model-Driven Monitoring: An Application of Graph Transformation for Design by Contract. In Graph Transformations (ICGT'06). LNCS 4178. Springer, 2006
15. G.Manning, D. Plump. The York Abstract Machine. In Proc. Graph Transformation and Visual Modelling Techniques (GT-VMT'06). ENTCS. Elsevier, 2006. To appear
16. Á. Schmidt, D. Varró. CheckVML: A Tool for Model Checking Visual Modeling Languages. In Proc. UML 2003: 6th International Conference on Unified Modeling Language. LNCS 2863, pp. 92-95. Springer, 2003
17. A. Schürr, A. J. Winter, A. Zündorf. The PROGRES Approach: Language and Environment. In Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Trans. Volume 2, pp. 487-550. World Scientific, 1999
18. G. Taentzer. AGG: AGraph Transformation Environment for Modeling and Validation of Software. In Proc. Application of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance (AGTIVE'03). LNCS 3062, pp. 446-453. Springer, 2004
19. http://formale-sprachen.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de/pub/eindex.html