Comparison of therapeutic effect of arthroscope versus mini-open in treating rotator cuff impairment: A meta-analysis

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1222-1227

  Wang, Yi Jun ^a   Song, Yu Cheng ^a   Fang, Rui ^a   Meng, Qing Cai ^a   Jia, Heng ^a   Hong, Han Gang ^a  

^a Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region   (China)

Author keywords

Arthroscope; Meta analysis; Mini open; Rotator cuff impairment; Systemtic review

Indexed keywords

ARTHROSCOPE; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY; COCHRANE LIBRARY; EMBASE; HUMAN; MEDLINE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REVIEW; ROTATOR CUFF INJURY; SHOULDER PAIN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THERAPY EFFECT;

EID: 78649853703     PISSN: 16722531     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Nho SJ, Shindle MK, Sherman SL, et al. Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair and Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89: 127-136.
2. Weber S, Kauffman J. Arthroscopic versus mini-open repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears. Abstract (unpublished data, AANA, 2004).
3. Köse KC, Tezen E, Cebesoy O, et al. Mini-open versus all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: comparison of the operative costs and the clinical outcomes. Adv Ther, 2008, 25(3): 249-259.
4. Pearsall AW 4th, Ibrahim KA, Madanagopal SG. The results of arthroscopic versus mini-open repair for rotator cuff tears at mid-term follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res, 2007, 2: 24.
5. Sauerbrey AM, Getz CL, Piancastelli M, et al, Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcome. Arthroscopy, 2005, 21(12): 1415-1420.
6. Kang L, Henn RF, Tashjian RZ, et al. Early outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a matched comparison with mini-open rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy, 2007, 23(6): 573-582.
7. Kim SH, Ha KI, Park JH, et al. Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years' follow-up. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19(7): 746-754.
8. Warner JJ, Tétreault P, Lehtinen J, et al. Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a cohort comparison study. Arthroscopy, 2005, 21(3): 328-332.
9. Youm T, Murray DH, Kubiak EN, et al. Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2005, 14: 455-459.
10. Verma NN, Dunn W, Adler RS, et al. All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a retrospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy, 2006, 2(6): 587-594.
11. Severud EL, Ruotolo C, Abbott DD, et al. All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A long-term retrospective outcome comparison. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19(3): 234-238.
12. Musil D, Sadovský P, Stehlík J. Massive tears of rotator cuff - comparison of mini-open and arthroscopic techniques. Part 1. Mini-open technique. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2006, 73(6): 387-393.
13. Musil D, Sadovský P. Massive tears of the rotator cuff - comparison of mini-open and arthroscopic techniques. Part 2. Arthroscopic repair. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2007, 74(5): 318-325.
14. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med, 2000, 342(25): 1887-1892.
15. Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R. The need to reform our assessment of evidence from clinical trials: A commentary. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 2008, 3: 23.