Linguistic analysis: Terms and phrases used by patients in E-mail messages to nurses

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2004, Pages 511-515

  Hsieh, Yichuan ^a   Hardardottir, Gudrun Audur ^b   Brennan, Patricia Flatley ^c  

^a University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

natural language processing; nursing; nursing classification systems

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); ELECTRONIC MAIL; LINGUISTICS; NURSING; VOCABULARY CONTROL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; TEXT PROCESSING; THESAURI;

DATA SET; ELECTRONIC MAIL MESSAGES; EMAIL MESSAGES; FREE TEXTS; LAY PEOPLES; LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS; NLP TOOLS; NURSING CLASSIFICATIONS; CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING TOOLS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; NURSING CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; NURSING;

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NURSE; NURSING CLASSIFICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 78649853467     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-511     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Eysenbach G, Jadad AR. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001; 3(2): el9.
2. Boulos MNK, Roudsari AV, Carson ER. A dynamic problem to knowledge linking Semantic Web service based on clinical codes. Medical Informatics & the Internet in Medicine 2002; 27(3): 127-137.
3. Zeng Q, Kogan S, Ash N, Greenes RA, Boxwala AA. Characteristics of consumer terminology for health information retrieval. Methods of Information in Medicine 2002; 4(41): 289-298.
4. Brennan PF, Aronson AR. Towards linking patients and clinical information: detecting UMLS concepts in E-mail. Journal of Biomedical Informatics (in press).
5. Kogan S, Zeng Q, Ash N, Greenes RA. Problems and challenges in patient information retrieval: a descriptive study. Proceedings/AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. 2001; 329-33.
6. McCray AT, Loane RF, Browne AC, Bangalore AK. Terminology issues in user access to Web-based medical information. Proceedings/AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. 1999; 107-11.
7. Patrick TB, Monga HK, Sievert ME, Houston Hall J, Longo DR. Evaluation of controlled vocabulary resources for development of a consumer entry vocabulary for diabetes. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001; 3(3):E24.
8. Zeng Q, Kogan S, Ash N, Greenes RA. Patient and clinician vocabulary: how different are they? Medlnfo 2001; 10(Pt l):399-403.
9. NLM (2003) Metathesaurus B3. Retrieved March 20, 2003 from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/METAB3.HTML
10. NLM (2003). Fact Sheet. UMLSR Metathesaurus. Retrieved March 20, 2003 from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umlsmeta.html
11. Aronson AR. Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: The MetaMap program. Proceedings/AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. 2001; 17-21.
12. Aronson AR, Boedenreider O, Chang HF, Humphrey SM, Mork JG, Nelson SJ, Rindflesch TC, Wilbur WJ. The NLM Indexing Initiative. Proceedings/AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. 2000; 17-21.
13. Aronson, A.R. (2001). MetaMap Evaluation. Retrieved March 30, 2003 from: http://skr.nlm.nih.gov/papers/Meta-Map
14. Aronson, A.R. (2003). Filtering the UMLS® Metathesaurus® for MetaMap (2002 Edition). Retrieved March 30, 2003 from: http://skr.nlm.nih.gov/ papers/MetaMap