Characterization of the seismic environment at the Sanford Underground Laboratory, South Dakota

Classical and Quantum Gravity

Volumn 27, Issue 22, 2010, Pages

  Harms, J ^a,g   Acernese, F ^b,c   Barone, F ^b,c   Bartos, I ^d   Beker, M ^e   Van Den Brand, J F J ^e   Christensen, N ^f   Coughlin, M ^f   DeSalvo, R ^g   Dorsher, S ^a   Heise, J ^h   Kandhasamy, S ^a   Mandic, V ^a   Marka S ^d   Mueller, G ⁱ   Naticchioni, L ^j,k   O'Keefe, T ^l   Rabeling, D S ^e   Sajeva, A ^m   Trancynger, T ^h   Wand, V ⁿ   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

^c INFN SEZIONE DI NAPOLI   (Italy)

^d Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^e NIKHEF   (Netherlands)

^f CARLETON COLLEGE   (United States)

^g CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^h Sanford Underground Laboratory   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^j SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^k INFN SEZIONE DI ROMA   (Italy)

^l SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

ⁿ AIRBUS GROUP INNOVATIONS   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649832954     PISSN: 02649381     EISSN: 13616382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/27/22/225011     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Saulson P R 1984 Terrestrial gravitational noise on a gravitational wave antenna Phys. Rev. D 30 732
2. Beccaria M et al 1998 Relevance of Newtonian seismic noise for the VIRGO interferometer sensitivity Class. Quantum Grav. 15 3339
3. Hughes S A and Thorne K S 1998 Seismic gravity-gradient noise in interferometric gravitational-wave detectors Phys. Rev. D 58 122002
4. Creighton T 2008 Tumbleweeds and airborne gravitational noise sources for LIGO Class. Quantum Grav. 25 125011
5. LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2009 LIGO: the laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 076901
6. Lück H et al 2006 Status of the GEO600 detector Class. Quantum Grav. 23 S71
7. Acernese F et al 2008 Virgo status Class. Quantum Grav. 25 184001
8. Tatsumi D 2008 TAMA300 interferometer development J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 120 032011
9. Robertson N A et al 2002 Quadruple suspension design for advanced LIGO Class. Quantum Grav. 19 4043
10. Robertson N A for the LSC 2004 Seismic isolation and suspension systems for advanced LIGO Proc. SPIE 5500 81
11. Chen Y 2003 Sagnac interferometer as a speed-meter-type, quantum-nondemolition gravitational-wave detector Phys. Rev. D 67 122004
12. Kimble H J, Levin Y, Matsko A B, Thorne K S and Vyatchanin S P 2001 Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics Phys. Rev. D 65 022002
13. Harms J et al 2003 Squeezed-input, optical-spring, signal-recycled gravitational-wave detectors Phys. Rev. D 68 042001
14. Bormann P 2002 The New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice (Potsdam: GFZ) chapter 4
15. Carter J A et al 1991 High-frequency seismic noise as a function of depth Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81 1101
16. Douze E J 1964 Signal and noise in deep wells Geophysics 29 721
17. Harms J, DeSalvo R, Dorsher S and Mandic V 2009 Gravity-gradient subtraction in 3rd generation underground gravitational-wave detectors in homogeneous media, arXiv:0910.2774
18. Caddey S W et al 1991 The Homestake Gold Mine: an Early Proterozoic iron-formation-hosted gold deposit, Lawrence County, South Dakota Geo. Survey. Bull. 1857-J (USGS Bulletins)
19. Smith J R for the LSC 2009 The path to the enhanced and advanced LIGO gravitational-wave detectors Class. Quantum Grav. 26 114013
20. Hild S, Chelkowski S, FreiseA, Franc J, MorgadoN, Flaminio R and DeSalvo R 2009Axylophone configuration for a third-generation gravitational wave detector Class. Quantum Grav. 27 015003
21. Acernese F, DeSalvo R, Harms J, Sajeva A, Shaffner L and Trancynger T 2008 Seismic stations implementation and improvements at Homestake LIGO DCC T080344
22. Pavlis G L and Vernon F L 1994 Calibration of seismometers using ground noise Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84 1243
23. Chatterji S, Blackburn L, Martin G and Katsavounidis E 2004 Multiresolution techniques for the detection of gravitational-wave bursts Class. Quantum Grav. 21 S1809
24. Blackburn L et al 2008 The LSC glitch group: monitoring noise transients during the fifth LIGO science run Class. Quantum Grav. 25 184004
25. Boettcher M S, McGarr A and Johnston M 2009 Extension of Gutenberg-Richter distribution to MW -1.3, no lower limit in sight Geophys. Res. Lett. 36 L10307
26. Bartos I et al 2008 Quick start guide optical timing distribution system advanced LIGO LIGO DCC E080541
27. Withers M M, Aster R C, Young C J and Chael E P 1996 High-frequency analysis of seismic background noise as a function of wind speed and shallow depth Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86 1507
28. Gutenberg B and Richter C F 1944 Frequency of earthquakes in California Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 34 185
29. Peterson J 1993 Observation and modeling of seismic background noise Open-File Report 93-322
30. Longuet-Higgins M S 1950 A theory of the origin of microseisms Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 243 1
31. Friedrich A, Krüger F and Klinge K 1998 Ocean-generated microseismic noise located with the Gräfenberg array J. Seism. 2 47
32. Harjes H-P and Seidl D 1978 Recording and analysis of broadband seismic data at the Gräfenberg (GRF) array J. Geophys. Res. 44 511
33. Toksöz M N and Lacoss R T 1968 Microseisms: mode structure and sources Science 159 872
34. Green P E, Frosch R A and Romney C F 1965 Principles of an experimental large aperture seismic array (LASA) Proc. IEEE 53 1821
35. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2010 NCEP Wave Model WAVEWATCH III
36. Tolman H L 2009 User Manual and System Documentation of WAVEWATCH III (TM) version 3.14 National Centers for Environmental Prediction
37. Young I R 1999 Wind Generated Ocean Waves (Amsterdam: Elsevier)