Harmonic pitch: Dependence on resolved partials, spectral edges, and combination tones

Hearing Research

Volumn 270, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 143-150

  Dai, Huanping ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; CUES; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; PITCH PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78649818660     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahumada A.J. Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation. J. Vis. 2002, 2:121-131.
2. Ahumada A.J.J., Lovell J. Stimulus features in signal detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1971, 49:1751-1756.
3. Berg B.G. Analysis of weights in multiple observation tasks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 86:1743-1746.
4. Burns E.M., Viemeister N.F. Nonspectral pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1976, 60:863-869.
5. de Boer, E., 1956. On the 'Residue' in Hearing, Ph.D. thesis, Amsterdam.
6. de Boer E. On the 'residue' and auditory pitch perception. Handbook of Sensory Physiology 1976, vol. V/3:479-583. Springer-Verlag, New York. W.D. Keidel, W.D. Neff (Eds.).
7. Carlyon R.P., Shackleton T.M. Comparing the fundamental frequencies of resolved and unresolved harmonics: Evidence for two pitch mechanisms?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994, 95:3541-3554.
8. de Cheveigne A. Pitch perception models. Pitch: Neural Coding and Perception 2005, Springer Verlag, New York. C. Plack, A. Oxenham, R. Fay, A. Popper (Eds.).
9. Chatterjee M., Zwislocki J.J. Cochlear mechanisms of frequency and intensity coding. I. The place code for pitch. Hear. Res. 1997, 111:65-75.
10. Ciocca V., Francis A.L., Aisha R., Wong L. The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002, 111:2250-2256.
11. Cohen M.A., Grossberg S., Wyse L.L. A spectral network model of pitch perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 98:862-879.
12. Dai H. On the relative influence of individual harmonics on pitch judgment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 107:953-959.
13. Dai H., Micheyl C. Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform 2010, 36(4):976-993.
14. Dai H., Nguyen Q., Green D.M. Decision rules of listeners in spectral-shape discrimination with or without signal-frequency uncertainty. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 99:2298-2306.
15. Flanagan J.L., Guttman N. On the pitch of periodic pulses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1960, 32:1308-1319.
16. Gockel H., Carlyon R.P., Plack C.J. Dominance region for pitch: effects of duration and dichotic presentation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 117:1326-1336.
17. Gockel H.E., Carlyon R.P., Plack C.J. Reduced contribution of a nonsimultaneous mistuned harmonic to residue pitch: the role of harmonic number. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 125:15-18.
18. Goldstein J.L. An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1973, 54:1496-1515.
19. Geurts L., Wouters J. Better place-coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 115:844-852.
20. Hartmann W.M. Pitch perception and the segregation and integration of auditory entities. Auditory Functions 1988, Wiley, New York. G.M. Edelman, W.E. Gall, W.M. Cowan (Eds.).
21. Hartmann W.M. Pitch, periodicity, and auditory organization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 100:3491-3502.
22. Houtsma A.J.M., Smurzynski J. Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1990, 87:304-310.
23. Lyon R., Shamma S. Computational strategies for pitch and timbre. Auditory Computations 1997, Springer Verlag, New York. H. Hawkins, T. McMullen, A. Popper, R. Fay (Eds.).
24. Lutfi R.A. Correlation coefficients and correlation ratios as estimates of observer weights in multiple-observation tasks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 92:1333-1334.
25. Meddis R., Hewitt M.J. Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery. I. Pitch identification. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1991, 89:2866-2882.
26. Meddis R., Hewitt M.J. Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery. II. Phase sensitivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1991, 89:2883-2894.
27. Meddis R., O'Mard L. A unitary model of pitch perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1997, 102:1811-1820.
28. Micheyl C., Oxenham A.J. Across-frequency pitch discrimination interference between complex tones containing resolved harmonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:1621-1631.
29. Moore B.C.J. Frequency analysis and pitch perception. Human Psychophysics 1993, 56-115. Springer-Verlag, New York. W.A. Yost, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
30. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Peters R.W. Relative dominance of individual harmonics in determining the pitch of complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1985, 77:1853-1860.
31. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Shailer M.J. Frequency and intensity difference limens for harmonics within complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984, 75:550-562.
32. Oxenham A.J., Bernstein J.G.W., Penagos H. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2004, 101(5):1421-1425.
33. Oxenham A.J., Micheyl C., Keebler M.V. Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 125:2189-2199.
34. Plack C. The Sense of Hearing 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
35. Plack C., Oxenham A. The psychophysics of pitch. Pitch: Neural Coding and Perception 2005, Springer Verlag, New York. C. Plack, A. Oxenham, R. Fay, A. Popper (Eds.).
36. Patterson R., Wightman F. Residue pitch as a function of component spacing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1976, 59:1450-1459.
37. Plomp R. Pitch of complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1967, 41:1526-1533.
38. Qin M.K., Oxenham A.J. Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 119:2417-2426.
39. Ritsma R.J. Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1967, 42:191-198.
40. Ritsma R.J. Periodicity detection. Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing 1970, 250-263. Sijthoff, Leiden, The Netherlands. R. Plomp, G.F. Smoorenburg (Eds.).
41. Richards V.M., Zhu S. Relative estimates of combination weights, decision criteria, and internal noise based on correlation coefficients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994, 95:423-434.
42. Schouten J.F. Five Articles on the Perception of Sounds (1938-1940) 1940, Institute for Perception, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
43. Shackleton T.M., Carlyon R.P. The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994, 95:3529-3540.
44. Singh S., Kong Y.Y., Zeng F.G. Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes. Ear Hear 2009, 30:160-168.
45. Shamma S., Klein D. The case of the missing pitch templates: how harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 107:2631-2644.
46. Srulovicz P., Goldstein J.L. A central spectrum model: a synthesis of auditory-nerve timing and place cues in monaural communication of frequency spectrum. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1983, 73:1266-1276.
47. Terhardt E. Zur Tonhohenwahrnehymung von Klangen II. Ein Funktionssehema. Acustica 1972, 26:187-199.
48. Terhardt E. Pitch, consonance, and harmony. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1974, 55:1061-1068.
49. Wightman F. The pattern-transformation model of pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1973, 54:407-416.
50. Yost W.A. The dominance region and ripple noise pitch: a test of the peripheral weighting model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1982, 72:416-425.
51. Zeng F.G. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear Res. 2002, 174:101-106.