Cable news, public opinion, and the 2004 party conventions

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 834-849

  Morris, Jonathan S ^a   Francia, Peter L ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cable news; media bias; party conventions; public opinion

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649805291     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1065912909338463     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alterman, Eric. 2001. The not obviously insane network. The Nation, September 13. http://www.thenation.com/doc/20011001/alterman.
2. Alterman, Eric. 2004. What liberal media? The truth about bias and the news. New York: Basic Books.
3. Bae, Hyuhn-Suhck. 1999. Product differentiation in cable news programming: The case in the cable national all-news networks. Journal of Media Economics 12:265-77.
4. Bagdikian, Ben H. 2004. The new media monopoly. Boston: Beacon.
5. Barker, David C. 2002. Rushed to judgment: Talk radio, persuasion, and American political behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Barkin, Steve M. 2003. American television news: The media marketplace and the public interest. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
7. Baron, David P. 2006. Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics 90:1-36.
8. Barrett, Andrew W., and Lowell W. Barrington. 2005. Bias in newspaper photograph selection. Political Research Quarterly 58:609-18.
9. Bernhardt, Dan, Stepfan Krasa, and Mattias Polborn. 2006. Political polarization and the electoral effects of media bias. CESifo Working Paper No. 1798. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=892475.
10. Bozell, L. Brent. 2004. Weapons of mass distortion: The coming meltdown of the liberal media. New York: Three Rivers Press.
11. Bray, Margaret, and David M. Kreps. 1987. Rational learning and rational expectations. In Arrow and the ascent of modern economics theory, ed. G R. Feiwel. London: MacMillan.
12. Brock, David. 2004. The Republican noise machine: Right wing media and how it corrupts democracy. New York: Crown.
13. Carlson, Tucker. 2003. Politicians, partisans, and parasites: My adventures in cable news. New York: Warner Books.
14. Cohen, Jeff. 2006. Cable news confidential. Sausalito, CA: Polipoint Press.
15. Collins, Scott. 2004. Crazy like a FOX: The inside story on how Fox News beat CNN. New York: Penguin.
16. D'Alessio, David, and Mike Allen. 2000. Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication 50:133-56.
17. Davis, Richard, and Diana Owen. 1998. The new media and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Della Vigna, Stefano, and Ethan Kaplan. 2007. The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123:1187-1234.
19. DeMarzo, Peter M., Dimitri Vayanos, and Jeffrey Zwiebel. 2003. Persuasion bias, social influence, and unidimensional opinions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118:909-68.
20. Farnsworth, Stephen J., and S. Robert Lichter. 2003. The nightly news nightmare: Network television's coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988-2000. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
21. Gentzkow, Matthew, and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2006. Media bias and reputation. Journal of Political Economy 114:280-316.
22. Groseclose, Tim, and Jeffrey Milyo. 2005. A measure of media bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120:1191-1237.
23. Hamilton, James T. 2004. All the news that's fit to sell. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Hofstetter, C. Richard. 1976. Bias in the news: Network television news coverage of the 1972 election campaign. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
25. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Joseph Capella. 2008. Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Kalb, Marvin. 2001. One scandalous story: Clinton, Lewinsky, & 13 days that tarnished American journalism. New York: Free Press.
27. Karabell, Zachary. 1998. The rise and fall of the televised political convention. Discussion Paper D-33, the Joan Shorenstein Center at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
28. Kitty, Alexandra. 2005. Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's war on journalism. New York: Disinformation Limited.
29. Kuklinski, James H., and Lee Sigelman. 1992. When objectivity is not objective: Network television news coverage of US senators and the paradox of objectivity. Journal of Politics 54:810-33.
30. Lichter, S. Robert, and Richard E. Noyes. 1995. Good intentions make bad news: Why Americans hate campaign journalism. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
31. Lodge, Milton, Kathleen M. McGraw, and Patrick Stroh. 1989. An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review 83:399-419.
32. Lodge, Milton, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Shawn Brau. 1995. The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review 89:309-26.
33. Lowry, Dennis T., and Jon A. Shidler. 1995. The sound bites, the biters, and the bitten: An analysis of network Tv news bias in campaign '92. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 72:33-44.
34. Maurer, Paul J. 1999. Media feeding frenzies: Press behavior during two Clinton scandals. Presidential Studies Quarterly 29:65-79.
35. McConnell, Bill, and John Higgins. 2004. Sinclair under siege. Broadcasting and Cable, October 25.
36. McGraw, Kathleen M., Milton Lodge, and Patrick Stroh. 1990. On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance, and sophistication. Political Behavior 12:41-58.
37. Morris, Jonathan S., and Peter L. Francia. 2007. Losing control? The rise of cable news and its effect on party convention coverage. In Rewiring politics: Presidential nominating conventions in the media age, ed. C. Panagopoulos, 147-64. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
38. Niven, David. 1999. Partisan bias in the media? A new test. Social Science Quarterly 80:847-57.
39. Niven, David. 2001. Bias in the news: Partisanship and negativity in media coverage of Presidents George Bush and Bill Clinton. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6:31-46.
40. Niven, David. 2002. Tilt? The search for media bias. Westport, CT: Praeger.
41. Niven, David. 2003. Objective evidence on media bias: Newspaper coverage of congressional party switchers. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 80:311-26.
42. Page, Benjamin I. 1996. Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Panagopoulos, Costas. 2007. Follow the bouncing ball: Assessing convention bumps, 1964-2004. In Rewiring politics: Presidential nominating conventions in the media age, ed. C. Panagopoulos, 16-28. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
44. Pew Research Center. 2004. News audiences increasingly politicized: Online news audiences larger, more diverse. News release. http://people-press.org/report/215/news-audiences-increasingly-politicized.
45. Pew Research Center. 2008. Key news audiences now blend online and traditional sources: Audience segments in a changing news environment. Survey report. http://people-press.org/report/444/news-media.
46. Podhoretz, John. 2004. Dan Rather's day of reckoning. The Weekly Standard, October 4.
47. Pomper, Gerald. 2007. The new role of the conventions as political rituals. In Rewiring politics: Presidential nominating conventions in the media age, ed. C. Panagopoulos, 189-208. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
48. Project for Excellence in Journalism. 2005. The state of the news media. Annual report. http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/2005/narrative_cabletv_audience.asp?cat=3&media=5.
49. Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, and Eugene Borgida. 1994. Individual and contextual variations in political candidate appraisals. American Political Science Review 88:193-99.
50. Salwen, Michael B., Bruce Garrison, and Paul D. Driscoll, eds. 2005. Online news and the public. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Scheuer, Jeffrey. 2001. The sound bite society: How television helps the right and hurts and left. New York: Routledge.
52. Sunstein, Cass R. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.