A variable precision rough set approach to the remote sensing land use/cover classification

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1466-1473

  Pan, Xin ^a,b,c   Zhang, Shuqing ^a   Zhang, Huaiqing ^d   Na, Xiaodong ^a,b   Li, Xiaofeng ^a  

^a NORTHEAST INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND AGRICULTURAL ECOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c CHANGCHUN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY   (China)

Author keywords

Knowledge discovery; Overlapping data; Remote sensing classification; Variable precision rough sets; VPRS

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY; OVERLAPPING DATA; REMOTE SENSING CLASSIFICATION; VARIABLE PRECISION ROUGH SETS; VPRS;

EXPERT SYSTEMS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; REMOTE SENSING; ROUGH SET THEORY;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALGORITHM; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LAND USE; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PRECISION; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA;

EID: 78649797191     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ahlqvist O. Using uncertain conceptual spaces to translate between land cover categories. International Journal Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(7):831-857.
2. Ahlqvist O., Keukelaar J., Oukbir K. Rough classification and accuracy assessment. International Journal Geographical Information Science 2000, 14(5):475-496.
3. Ahlqvist O., Keukelaar J., Oukbir K. Rough and fuzzy geographical data integration. International Journal Geographical Information Science 2003, 17(3):223-234.
4. Brian L.B., David P.L., Jiaguo Q. Identifying optimal spectral bands from in situ measurements of Great Lakes coastal wetlands using second-derivative analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 97(2):238-248.
5. Chouchoulas A., Shen.Q. Rough set-aided keyword reduction for text categorization. Applied Artifcial Intelligence 2001, 15(9):843-873.
6. Grzymala-Busse J.W. LERS-a system for learning from examples based on rough sets. Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory 1992, 3-18. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. R. Slowinski (Ed.).
7. Han J., Cai Y., Cercone N. Data-driven discovery of quantitative rules in relational databases. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 1993, 5(1):29-40.
8. Kryszkiewicz, M., 1995. Maintenance of reducts in the variable precision rough sets model. In: Proceedings of the 1995 ACM Computer Science Conference, USA. pp. 355-372.
9. Kryszkiewicz M. Rules in incomplete information systems. Information Sciences 1999, 113(3-4):271-292.
10. Kurgan L.A., Cios K.J. CAIM discretization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Knowledges and Data Engineering 2004, 16(2):145-153.
11. Kwak N., Choi C.H. Input feature selection for classification problems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 2002, 13(1):143-159.
12. Lei T.C., Wan S., Chou T.Y. The comparison of PCA and discrete rough set for feature extraction of remote sensing image classification-a case study on rice classification. Computational Geosciences 2007, 12(1):1-14.
13. Leung Y., Fung T., Mi J.S., Wu W.Z. A rough set approach to the discovery of classification rules in spatial data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2007, 21(9):1033-1058.
14. Masahiro I. Several approaches to attribute reduction in variable precision rough set model. Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence 2005, Springer, Berlin, pp.215-226. 10.1007/11526018_22.
15. Nguyen, H.S., Skowron, A., 1995. Quantization of real values attributes, rough set and Boolean reasoning approach. In: Proceedings of the Second Joint Conference on Information Sciences, Wrightsville Beach, NC, USA. pp. 34-37.
16. Ouyang Y., Ma J.W. Land cover classification based on tolerant rough set. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2006, 24(14):3041-3047.
17. Pal S.K., Mitra P. Multispectral image segmentation using the rough-set-initialized EM algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2002, 40(11):2495-2501.
18. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 1982, 11:341-356.
19. Pawlak Z. Rough classification. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1999, 51:369-383.
20. Pawlak Z. Some issues on rough sets. Transactions on Rough Sets 2004, 1:1-58.
21. Pontius R.G. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2000, 66(8):1011-1016.
22. Rolka A.M., Rolka L. Variable precision fuzzy rough sets. Transactions on Rough Sets 2004, 1:144-159.
23. Shen Q., Chouchoulas A. A rough-fuzzy approach for generating classification rules. Pattern Recognition 2002, 35(11):2425-2438.
24. Shen Q., Jensen R. Rough sets, their extensions and applications. International Journal of Automation and Computing 2007, 04(3):217-228.
25. Shuqing Z., Xiaodong N., Bo K., Wang Z.M., Jiang H.X., Yu H., Zhao Z.C., Li X.F., Liu C.Y., Dale P. Identifying wetland change in China's Sanjiang plain using remote sensing. Wetlands 2009, 29(1):302-313.
26. Skowron A., Rauszer C. The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems. Intelligent Decision Support-Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory 1992, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 331-362.
27. Yasdi Y. Combining rough sets learning and neural learning: method to deal with uncertain and imprecise information. Neural Computing 1996, 7(1):61-84.
28. Ziarko W. Variable precision rough set model. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 1993, 46(1):39-59.
29. Ziarko W. Probabilistic decision tables in the variable precision rough set model. Computational Intelligence 2001, 17(3):593-603.