Species-specific SSR alleles for studies of hybrid cattails (Typha Latifolia × T. Angustifolia; Typhaceae) in North America

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 97, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2061-2067

  Snow, Allison A ^a   Travis, Steven E ^b   Wildová, Radka ^c,d   Fér, Tomáš ^e   Sweeney, Patricia M ^a   Marburger, Joy E ^f   Windels, Steven ^f   Kubátová, Barbora ^e,g   Goldberg, Deborah E ^d   Mutegi, Evans ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^e CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^f NATIONAL PARK SERVICE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Cattail; Gene flow; Hybrid; Introgression; Invasive species; Molecular markers; Morphological traits; Species specific markers; Structure; Typha; Wetlands

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; HERB; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; INVASIVE SPECIES; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; WETLAND;

NORTH AMERICA; UKRAINE;

TYPHA; TYPHA ANGUSTIFOLIA; TYPHA LATIFOLIA; TYPHACEAE;

EID: 78649788151     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000187     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ANGELONI, N. L., K. J. JANKOWSKI, N. C. TUCHMAN, AND J. J. KELLY. 2006. Effects of an invasive cattail species (Typha × glauca) on sediment nitrogen and microbial community composition in a freshwater wetland. Federation of European Microbiological Societies (FEMS), Microbiology Letters 263: 86-92.
2. ARNOLD, M. L. 1997. Oxford series in ecology and evolution: Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
3. BELKHIR, K., P. BORSA, L. CHIKHI, N. RAUFAST, AND F. BONHOMME. 2004. GENETIX 405, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la g é n é tique des populations [computer program]. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Universit é de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.
4. BOERS, A. M., R. L. D. VELTMAN, AND J. B. ZEDLER. 2007. Typha × glauca dominance and extended hydroperiod constrain restoration of wetland diversity. Ecological Engineering 29: 232-244.
5. CAMPBELL, L. G., A. A. SNOW, AND C. E. RIDLEY. 2006. Weed evolution after crop gene introgression: Greater survival and fecundity of hybrids in a new environment. Ecology Letters 9: 1198-1209.
6. CARMICHAEL, D. 1980. A record of environmental change during recent millenia in the Hackensack tidal marsh, New Jersey. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 107: 514-524.
7. ELLEGREN, H., C. R. PRIMMER, AND B. C. SHELDON. 1995. Microsatellite evolution: Directionality or bias in locus selection. Nature Genetics 11: 360-362.
8. ELLSTRAND, N. C., AND K. A. SCHIERENBECK. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 7043-7050.
9. EVANNO, S., S. REGNAUT, AND J. GOUDET. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611-2620.
10. FARRER, E. C., AND D. E. GOLDBERG. 2009. Litter drives ecosystem and plant community changes in cattail invasion. Ecological Applications 19: 398-412.
11. GALATOWITSCH, S. M., N. O. ANDERSON, AND P. D. ASCHER. 1999. Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19: 733-755.
12. GRACE, J. B., AND J. S. HARRISON. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 73. Typha latifolia L., Typha angustifolia L. and Typha × glauca Godr. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 66: 361-379.
13. HEGDE, S. G., J. D. NASON, J. M. CLEGG, AND N. C. ELLSTRAND. 2006. The evolution of California' s wild radish has resulted in the extinction of its progenitors. Evolution 60: 1187-1197.
14. KUEHN, M. M., J. E. MINOR, AND B. N. WHITE. 1999. An examination of hybridization between the cattail species Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia using random amplified polymorphic DNA and chloroplast DNA markers. Molecular Ecology 8: 1981-1990.
15. KUEHN, M. M., AND B. N. WHITE. 1999. Morphological analysis of genetically identified cattails Typha latifolia, Typha angustifolia, and Typha × glauca. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 906-912.
16. LAVERGNE, S., AND J. MOLOFSKY. 2007. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 3883-3888.
17. LEPS, J., AND P. SMILAUER. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
18. PEDERSON, D. C., D. M. PETEET, D. KURDYLA, AND T. GUILDERSON. 2005. Medieval warming, little ice age, and European impact on the environment during the last millennium in the lower Hudson Valley, New York, USA. Quaternary Research 63: 238-249.
19. PETIT, R. J., C. BODENES, A. DUCOUSSO, G. ROUSSEL, AND A. KREMER. 2004. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytologist 161: 151-164.
20. PRITCHARD, J. K., M. STEPHENS, AND P. DONNELLY. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
21. RHYMER, J. M., AND D. S. SIMBERLOFF. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 83-109.
22. SELBO, S. M., AND A. A. SNOW. 2004. The potential for hybridization between Typha angustifolia and Typha latifolia in a constructed wetland. Aquatic Botany 78: 361-369.
23. SELKOE, K. A., AND R. J. TOONEN. 2006. Microsatellites for ecologists: A practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecology Letters 9: 615-629.
24. SHIH, J. G., AND S. A. FINKELSTEIN. 2008. Range dynamics and invasive tendencies in Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia in eastern North America derived from herbarium and pollen records. Wetlands 28: 1-16.
25. SMITH, S. G. 1967. Experimental and natural hybrids in North American Typha (Typhaceae). American Midland Naturalist 78: 257-287.
26. SMITH, S. G. 2000. Typhaceae. In Flora of North America Editorial Committee [eds.], Flora of North America, vol. 22. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
27. STUCKEY, R. L., AND D. P. SALAMON. 1987. Typha angustifolia in North America: Masquerading as a native. American Journal of Botany 74: 757 [abstract].
28. TER BRAAK, C. J. F., AND P. SMILAUER. 1998. CANOCO reference manual and user' s guide to CANOCO for Windows: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA.
29. TRAVIS, S. E., J. E. MARBURGER, S. WINDELS, AND B. KUBÁTOVÁ. 2010. Hybridization dynamics of invasive cattail (Typhaceae) stands in the Western Great Lakes Region of North America: a molecular analysis. Journal of Ecology 98: 7-17.
30. TSYUSKO, O. V., M. H. SMITH, R. R. SHARITZ, AND T. C. GLENN. 2005. Genetic and clonal diversity of two cattail species, Typha latifolia and T. angustifolia (Typhaceae), from Ukraine. American Journal of Botany 92: 1161-1169.
31. TSYUSKO-OMELTCHENKO, O. V., N. A. SCHNABLE, M. H. SMITH, AND T. C. GLENN. 2003. Microsatellite loci isolated from narrow-leaved cattail Typha angustifolia. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 535-538.
32. TUCHMAN, N. C., D. J. LARKIN, P. GEDDES, R. WILDOVA, K. JANKOWSKI, AND D. GOLDBERG. 2009. Patterns of environmental change associated with Typha x glauca invasion in a Great Lakes coastal wetland. Wetlands 29: 964-975.
33. VILA, M., AND C. M. D' ANTONIO. 1998. Hybrid vigor for clonal growth in Carpobrotus (Aizoaceae) in coastal California. Ecological Applications 8: 1196-1205.
34. WEIR, B. S., AND C. C. COCKERHAM. 1984. Estimating F -statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
35. WOO, I., AND J. B. ZEDLER. 2002. Can nutrients alone shift a sedge meadow towards dominance by the invasive Typha × glauca? Wetlands 22: 509-521.
36. WRIGHT, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15: 323-354.
37. ZHANG, X., M. TAPIA, J. B. WEBB, Y. HUANG, AND S. MIAO. 2008. Molecular signatures of two cattail species, Typha domingensis and Typha latifolia (Typhaceae), in South Florida. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49: 368-376.