Evolutionary innovations and the organization of protein functions in genotype space

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2010, Pages

  Ferrada, Evandro ^a,c   Wagner, Andreas ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACID PHOSPHATASE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; DNA DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASE; GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE DEHYDROGENASE (UBIQUINONE); RNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; RNA DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASE; TYPE II SITE SPECIFIC DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; UBIQUITIN THIOLESTERASE; ENZYME; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME STRUCTURE; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; BINDING SITE; BIOCATALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; BIOCATALYSIS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; ENZYMES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOTYPE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78649761770     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014172     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Maynard Smith J (1970) Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature 225: 563-564.
2. Hamming RW (1980) Coding and Information Theory, Prentice Hall, Englewook Cliffs, N.J.
3. Mantaci S, Restivo A, Sciortino M (2008) Distance measures for biological sequences: Some recent approaches. Int J Approximate Reasoning 47: 109-124.
4. Finkelstein AV, Gutin AM, Badretdinov AY (1995) Boltzmann-like statistics of protein architectures. Origins and consequences. In: Biswas BB, Roy S, eds. Subcellular Biochemistry, Vol 24. Proteins: Structure, function and engineering. Plenum Press, New York.
5. Orengo CA, Jones DT, Thornton JM (1994) Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 372: 631-634.
6. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247: 536-540.
7. Kleina L, Miller J (1990) Genetics studies of the lac repressor. 13. Extensive amino-acid replacements generated by the use of natural and synthetic nonsense suppressors. J Mol Biol 212: 295-318.
8. Rennell D, Bouvier S, Hardy L, Poteete A (1991) Systematic mutation of bacteriophage T4 lysozyme. J Mol Biol 222: 67-87.
9. Huang W, Petrosino J, Hirsch M, Shenkin P, Palzkill T (1996) Amino acid sequence determinants of beta-lactamase structure and activity. J Mol Biol 258: 688-703.
10. Aronson HE, Royer WE, Jr., Hendrickson WA (1994) Quantification of tertiary structural conservation despite primary sequence drift in the globin fold. Protein Sci 3: 1706-1711.
11. Rost B (1999) Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng 12: 85-94.
12. Kunin V, Teichmann SA, Huynen MA, Ouzounis CA (2005) The properties of protein family space depend on experimental design. Bioinformatics 21: 2618-2622.
13. Taylor SV, Walter KU, Kast P, Hilvert D (2001) Searching sequence space for protein catalysts. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98: 1056-1060.
14. Axe DD (2004) Estimating the prevalence of protein sequences adopting functional enzyme folds. J Mol Biol 341: 1295-1315.
15. Li H, Helling R, Tang Ch, Wingreen N (1996) Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science 273: 666-669.
16. Kussell E (2005) The designability hypothesis and protein evolution. Protein Pept Lett 12: 111-116.
17. Brannigan JA, Wilkinson AJ (2002) Protein engineering 20 years on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 964-970.
18. Michael SF, Kilfoil VJ, Schmidt MH, Amann BT, Berg JM (1992) Metal binding and folding properties of a minimalist Cys2His2 Zinc finger peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 4796-4800.
19. Choo Y, Isalan M (2000) Advances in zinc finger engineering. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 10: 411-416.
20. Buchler NEG, Goldstein RA (1999) Effect of alphabet size and foldability requirements on protein structure designability. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 34: 113-124.
21. Mann M, Backofen R, Will S (2009) Equivalence classes of optimal structures in HP protein models including side chains. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Constraint Based Methods for Bioinformatics (WCB09).
22. Bornberg-Bauer E (1997) How are model protein structures distributed in sequence space? Biophys J 73: 2393-2403.
23. Bornberg-Bauer E, Chan HS (1999) Modeling evolutionary landscapes: Mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 10689-10694.
24. Holm L, Sander C (1998) Touring protein fold space with Dali/FSSP. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 316-319.
25. Xia Y, Levitt M (2004) Simulating protein evolution in sequence and structure space. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14: 202-207.
26. Shah I, Hunter L (1997) Predicting enzyme function from sequence: a systematic appraisal. In Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. In: Gaasterland T, Karp P, Karplus K, Ouzounis C, Sander C, Valenvia A, eds. 276-283, Halkidiki, Greece: AAAI Press.
27. Pawlowski K, Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Godzik A (2000) Sensitive sequence comparison as protein function predictor. Pac Symp Biocomp 8: 42-53.
28. Devos D, Valencia A (2000) Practical limits of function prediction. Proteins 41: 98-107.
29. Wilson CA, Kreychman J, Gerstein M (2000) Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores. J Mol Biol 297: 233-249.
30. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2001) Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 307: 1113-1143.
31. Sangar V, Blankenberg DJ, Altman N, Lesk AM (2007) Quantitative sequencefunction relationships in proteins based on gene ontology. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 294.
32. Rost B (2002) Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J Mol Biol 318: 595-608.
33. Nagano N, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2002) One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J Mol Biol 321: 741-765.
34. Steitz TA (1999) DNA polymerases: Structural diversity and common mechanisms. J Biol Chem 274: 17395-19398.
35. Reidhaar-Olson JF, Sauer RT (1990) Functionally acceptable substitutions in two alpha-helical regions of lambda repressor. Proteins 7: 306-316.
36. Schuster P, Fontana W, Stadler PF, Hofacker IL (1994) From sequences to shape and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 255: 279-284.
37. Ciliberti S, Martin OC, Wagner A (2007) Robustness can evolve gradually in complex regulatory gene networks with varying topology. PLoS Comp Biol 3(2): e15.
38. Matias Rodrigues JF, Wagner A (2009) Evolutionary plasticity and innovations in complex metabolic reaction networks. PLoS Comp Biol 5(12): e1000613.
39. The UniProt Consortium (2009) The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 37: D169-D174.
40. Greene LH, Lewis TE, Addou S, Cuff A, Dallman T, et al. (2007) The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D291-D297.
41. Eddy SR (1998) Profile Hidden Markov Models. Bioinformatics 14: 755-763.
42. Bairoch A (2000) The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 304-305.
43. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673-4680.
44. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J (2000) T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 302: 205-217.
45. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
46. Prakash S, Johnson RE, Prakash L (2005) Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 317-353.
47. Keefe AD, Szostak JW (2001) Functional proteins from a random-sequence library. Nature 410: 715-718.
48. Martin ACR, Orengo CA, Hutchinson EG, Jones S, Karmirantzou M, et al. (1998) Protein folds and functions. Structure 6: 875-884.
49. Hegyi H, Gerstein M (1999) The relationship between protein structure and function: a comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome. J Mol Biol 288: 147-164.
50. Lipman DJ, Wilbur WJ (1991) Modelling neutral and selective evolution of protein folding. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 245: 7-11.
51. Babajide A, Farber R, Hofacker IL, Inman J, Lapedes AS, et al. (2001) Exploring Protein Sequence Space Using Knowledge-based Potentials. J Theor Biol 212: 35-46.
52. Aharoni A, Gaidukov L, Khersonsky O, Gould McQ S, Roodveldt C, et al. (2005) The evolvability of promiscuous protein functions. Nature Genetics 37: 73-76.
53. Knoll AH (1992) The early evolution of eukaryotes - a geological perspective. Science 256: 622-627.
54. Elena SF, Cooper VS, Lenski RE (1996) Punctuated evolution caused by selection of rare beneficial mutations. Science 272: 1802-1804.
55. Fontana W, Schuster P (1998a) Continuity in evolution: On the nature of transitions. Science 280: 1451-1455.
56. Fontana W, Schuster P (1998b) Shaping space: the possible and the attainable in RNA genotype-phenotype mapping. J Theor Biol 194: 491-515.
57. Adams KL, Qiu YL, Stoutemyer M, Palmer JD (2002) Punctuated evolution of mitochondrial gene content: High and variable rates of mitochondrial gene loss and transfer to the nucleus during angiosperm evolution. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99: 9905-9912.
58. Stenseth NC, Maynard Smith J (1984) Coevolution in ecosystems: red queen evolution or stasis. Evolution 38: 870-880.
59. Maynard Smith J, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, et al. (1985) Developmental constraints and evolution. Q Rev Biol 60: 265-287.
60. Amundson R (1994) Two Concepts of constraint - adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology. Philosophy of Science 61: 556-578.
61. Hodin J (2000) Plasticity and constraints in development and evolution. Presented at Modularity of Animal Form Workshop, Friday Harbor, Washington.
62. Brakefield PM (2006) Evo-devo and constraints on selection. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 362-368.
63. Chothia C, Lesk AM (1986) The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J 5: 823-6.
64. Chothia C, Lesk AM (1987) The evolution of protein structures. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 52: 399-405.