AMEND: A model explaining neutrino masses and dark matter testable at the LHC and MEG

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2010, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Farzan, Yasaman ^a   Pascoli, Silvia ^b   Schmidt, Michael A ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS IPM   (Iran)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of theories beyond the SM; Neutrino physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649707266     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2010)111     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. L. M. Krauss, S. Nasri and M. Trodden, A model for neutrino masses and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 085002 [hep-ph/0210389].
2. K. Cheung and O. Seto, Phenomenology of TeV right-handed neutrino and the dark matter model, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 113009 [hep-ph/0403003].
3. T. Asaka, S. Blanchet and M. Shaposhnikov, The nuMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses, Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 151 [hep-ph/0503065].
4. E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225].
5. J. Kubo, E. Ma and D. Suematsu, Cold dark matter, radiative neutrino mass, μ → eγ and neutrinoless double beta decay, Phys. Lett. B 642 (2006) 18 [hep-ph/0604114].
6. E. J. Chun and H. B. Kim, Axino light dark matter and neutrino masses with R-parity violation, JEEP 10 (2006) 082 [hep-ph/0607076].
7. T. Hambye, K. Kannike, E. Ma and M. Raidal, Emanations of dark matter: muon anomalous magnetic moment, radiative neutrino mass and novel leptogenesis at the TeV scale, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 095003 [hep-ph/0609228].
8. J. Kubo and D. Suematsu, Neutrino masses and CDM in a non-super symmetric model, Phys. Lett. B 643 (2006) 336 [hep-ph/0610006].
9. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura and O. Seto, Neutrino mass, dark matter and baryon asymmetry via TeV-scale physics without fine-tuning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 051805 [arXiv: 0807. 0361].
10. M. Aoki, S. Kanemura and O. Seto, A model of TeV scale physics for neutrino mass, dark matter and baryon asymmetry and its phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 033007 [arXiv: 0904. 3829].
11. B. Bajc, T. Enkhbat, D. K. Ghosh, G. Senjanović and Y. Zhang, MSSM in view of PAMELA and Fermi-LAT, JEEP 05 (2010) 048 [arXiv: 1002.3631].
12. C. Boehm, Y. Farzan, T. Hambye, S. Palomares-Ruiz and S. Pascoli, Are small neutrino masses unveiling the missing mass problem of the universe?, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 043516 [hep-ph/0612228].
13. Y. Farzan, A minimal model linking two great mysteries: neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 073009 [arXiv:0908.3729].
14. A. Zee, A theory of lepton number violation, neutrino Majorana mass and oscillation, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 389.
15. K. S. Babu, Model of 'calculable' Majorana neutrino masses, Phys. Lett. B 203 (1988) 132.
16. E. Ma, Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1171 [hep-ph/9805219].
17. WMAP collaboration, E. Komatsu et al., Five-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180 (2009) 330 [arXiv: 0803. 0547].
18. THE CDMS-II collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., Dark matter search results from the CDMS E experiment, Science 327 (2010) 1619 [arXiv:0912.3592].
19. R. Bernabei et al., New results from DAMA/LIBRA, Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 39 [arXiv: 1002.1028].
20. COGENT collaboration, C. E. Aalseth et al., Results from a search for light-mass dark matter with a P-type point contact Germanium detector, arXiv: 1002.4703.
21. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Fust dark matter results from the XENON100 experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 131302 [arXiv: 1005.0380].
22. C. McCabe, The astrophysical uncertainties of dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 023530 [arXiv: 1005.0579].
23. J. I. Collar and D. N. McKinsey, Comments on 'First dark matter results from the XENON100 experiment', arXiv: 1005. 0838.
24. XENON collaboration, Reply to the comments on the XENON100 first dark matter results, arXiv: 1005.2615.
25. J. I. Collar and D. N. McKinsey, Response to arXw:1005.2615, arXiv: 1005.3723.
26. PARTICLE DATA GROUP collaboration, C. Amsler et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Lett. B 667 (2008) 1.
27. A. Boyarsky, J. Lesgourgues, O. Ruchayskiy and M. Viel, Lyman-α constraints on warm and on warm-plus-cold dark matter models, JCAP 05 (2009) 012 [arXiv: 0812. 0010].
28. P. D. Serpico and G. G. Raffelt, MeV-mass dark matter and primordial nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043526 [astro-ph/0403417].
29. G. 't Hoolt et al., Recent developments in gauge theories (proceedings of the Nato Advanced Study Institute, August 26-September 8, Cargese, France (1979)), Plenum Press, New York U. S. A. (1980), pag. 438.
30. 2γ, Eur. Phys. J. C 29 (2003) 191 [hep-ph/0302221].
31. MEG collaboration, J. Adam et al., A limit for the μ → eγ decay from the MEG experiment, Nucl. Phys. B 834 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0908.2594].
32. Super-B factory, http://www.pi.inln. it/SuperB/.
33. Y. Kuno and Y. Okada, Muon decay and physics beyond the standard model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 151 [hep-ph/9909265].
34. S. Andreas, T. Hambye and M. H. G. Tytgat, WIMP dark matter, Higgs exchange and DAMA, JCAP 10 (2008) 034 [arXiv: 0808.0255].
35. C. E. Yaguna, Large contributions to dark matter annihilation from three-body final states, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 075024 [arXiv: 1003.2730].
36. L. L. Honorez and C. E. Yaguna, The inert doublet model of dark matter revisited, JHEP 09 (2010) 046 [arXiv: 1003.3125].
37. A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski and M. Spira, HDECAY: a program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its super symmetric extension, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998) 56 [hep-ph/9704448].
38. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Super symmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380].
39. D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 043502 [hep-ph/0101138].
40. R. Bernabei et al., Investigating the DAM A annual modulation data in the framework of inelastic dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 23 (2002) 61.
41. D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Inelastic dark matter at DAMA, CDMS and future experiments, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 124 (2003) 197 [astro-ph/0208403].
42. D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, The status of inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 063509 [hep-ph/0402065].
43. S. Chang, G. D. Kribs, D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Inelastic dark matter in light of DAMA/LIBRA, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 043513 [arXiv:0807.2250].
44. J. March-Russell, C. McCabe and M. McCullough, Inelastic dark matter, non-standard halos and the DAMA/LIBRA results, JEEP 05 (2009) 071 [arXiv:0812.1931].
45. D. S. M. Alves, S. R. Behbahani, P. Schuster and J. G. Wacker, Composite inelastic dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 692 (2010) 323 [arXiv:0903.3945].
46. Y. Cui, D. E. Morrissey, D. Poland and L. Randall, Candidates for Inelastic Dark Matter, JEEP 05 (2009) 076 [arXiv:0901.0557].
47. R. Bernabei et al., Investigating electron interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 023506 [arXiv:0712.0562].
48. J. Kopp, V. Niro, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, DAMA/LIBRA and leptonically interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 083502 [arXiv: 0907. 3159].
49. XENON10 collaboration, J. Angle et al., Constraints on inelastic dark matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 115005 [arXiv:0910.3698].
50. XENON collaboration, J. Angle et al., First results from the XENON10 dark matter experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 021303 [arXiv: 0706. 0039].
51. V. N. Lebedenko et al., Result from the first science run of the ZEPLIN-III dark matter search experiment, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 052010 [arXiv: 0812.1150].
52. G. Angloher et al., Commissioning run of the CRESST-II dark matter search, arXiv:0809.1829.
53. KIMS collaboration, H. S. Lee et al., Limits on WIMP-nucleon cross section with CsI (Tl) crystal detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 091301 [arXiv:0704.0423].
54. S. Archambault et al., Dark matter spin-dependent limits for WIMP interactions on 19-F by PICASSO, Phys. Lett. B 682 (2009) 185 [arXiv:0907.0307].
55. J. Kopp, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Global interpretation of direct Dark Matter searches after CDMS-II results, JCAP 02 (2010) 014 [arXiv:0912.4264].
56. A. L. Fitzpatrick, D. Hooper and K. M. Zurek, Implications of CoGeNT and DAMA for light WIMP dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 115005 [arXiv: 1003. 0014].
57. S. Chang, J. Liu, A. Pierce, N. Weiner and I. Yavin, CoGeNT interpretations, JCAP 08 (2010) 018 [arXiv: 1004.0697].
58. F. Petriello and K. M. Zurek, DAMA and WIMP dark matter, JEEP 09 (2008) 047 [arXiv: 0806. 3989].
59. K. Schmidt-Hoberg and M. W. Winkler, Improved constraints on inelastic dark matter, JCAP 09 (2009) 010 [arXiv:0907.3940].
60. S. Nussinov, L.-T. Wang and I. Yavin, Capture of inelastic dark matter in the Sun, JCAP 08 (2009) 037 [arXiv:0905.1333].
61. D. Hooper, J. I. Collar, J. Hall and D. McKinsey, A consistent dark matter interpretation for CoGeNT and DAMA/LIBRA, arXiv: 1007.1005.
62. P. W. Graham, R. Harnik, S. Rajendran and P. Saraswat, Exothermic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 063512 [arXiv: 1004.0937].
63. Xenon 100, http://xenon. astro.columbia.edu/.
64. R. M. Crocker, N. F. Bell, C. Balázs and D. I. Jones, Radio and gamma-ray constraints on dark matter annihilation in the galactic center, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 063516 [arXiv:1002.0229].
65. Q. Yuan, P.-F. Yin, X.-J. Bi, X.-M. Zhang and S.-H. Zhu, Gamma rays and neutrinos from dark matter annihilation in galaxy clusters, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 023506 [arXiv: 1002.0197].
66. M. Ackermann et al., Constraints on dark matter annihilation in clusters of galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, JCAP 05 (2010) 025 [arXiv: 1002. 2239].
67. K. N. Abazajian, P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko and C. Kilic, Conservative constraints on dark matter from the Fermi-LAT isotropic diffuse gamma-ray background spectrum, arXiv: 1002.3820.
68. FERMI-LAT collaboration, B. Lott, New insight into gamma-ray blazars from the Fermi-LAT, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 19 (2010) 831.
69. Y. Cui, J. D. Mason and L. Randall, General analysis of antideuteron searches for dark matter, arXiv: 1006. 0983.
70. O. Mena, S. Palomares-Ruiz and S. Pascoli, Reconstructing WIMP properties with neutrino detectors, Phys. Lett. B 664 (2008) 92 [arXiv:0706.3909].
71. Icecube, http://icecube.wisc.edu/.
72. D. Hooper, F. Petriello, K. M. Zurek and M. Kamionkowski, The new DAMA dark-matter window and energetic-neutrino searches, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015010 [arXiv: 0808. 2464].
73. M. Cirelli et al., Spectra of neutrinos from dark matter annihilations, Nucl. Phys. B 727 (2005) 99 [hep-ph/0506298].
74. A. E. Erkoca, M. H. Reno and I. Sarcevic, Muon fluxes from dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 043514 [arXiv:0906.4364].
75. A. Menon, R. Morris, A. Pierce and N. Weiner, Capture and indirect detection of inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 015011 [arXiv: 0905.1847].
76. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381.
77. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040].
78. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csáki, G. Marandella and A. Strumia, The minimal set of electroweak precision parameters, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 033011 [hep-ph/0604111].
79. N. Maekawa, Electroweak symmetry breaking by vector-like fermions' condensation with small S and T parameters, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 1684.
80. G. Cynolter and E. Lendvai, Electroweak precision constraints on vector-like fermions, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 463 [arXiv:0804.4080].
81. M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek, Discovering the Higgs through highly-displaced vertices, Phys. Lett. B 661 (2008) 263 [hep-ph/0605193].
82. Atlas detector, http://atlas.ch/.
83. A. Esmaili and Y. Farzan, On the oscillation of neutrinos produced by the annihilation of dark matter inside the Sun, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 113010 [arXiv: 0912.4033].