Early exposure to odors changes later visual prey preferences in cuttlefish

Developmental Psychobiology

Volumn 52, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 833-837

  Guibé, Mathieu ^a   Boal, Jean G ^b   Dickel, Ludovic ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE CAEN   (France)

^b MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemoreception; Cross modal effect; Invertebrate; Predation; Sensory development

Indexed keywords

SEA WATER;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BRACHYURA; CEPHALOPOD; CRANGONIDAE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD PREFERENCE; METHODOLOGY; MOLLUSC; ODOR; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRACHYURA; CRANGONIDAE; DECAPODIFORMES; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD PREFERENCES; MOLLUSCA; ODORS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SEAWATER;

DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); INVERTEBRATA; MOLLUSCA; SEPIIDAE;

EID: 78649700331     PISSN: 00121630     EISSN: 10982302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dev.20470     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Boal, J. G., & Golden, D. K. (1999). Distance chemoreception in the common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 235, 307-317.
2. Boal, J. G., Wittenberg, K. M., & Hanlon, R. T. (2000). Observational learning does not explain improvement in predation tactics by cuttlefish (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Behavioural Processes, 52, 141-153.
3. Boletzky, S. v. (1983). Sepia officinalis. In: Boyle P. R. (Ed.), Cephalopod life cycles, Vol. 1: Species accounts (pp. 31-52). New York: Academic Press.
4. Calver, G. A., & Lewi, J. W. (2004). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Clark, R. J., Jackson, R. R., & Cutler, B. (2000). Chemical cues from ants influence predatory behavior in Habrocestum pulex (Hentz), an ant-eating jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae). Journal of Arachnology, 28, 299-341.
6. Darmaillacq, A.-S., Chichery, R., & Dickel, L. (2006). Food imprinting, new evidence from the cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). Biology Letters, 2, 345-347.
7. Darmaillacq, A.-S., Chichery, R., Poirier, R., & Dickel, L. (2004). Effect of early feeding experience on subsequent prey preference by cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis Developmental Psychobiology, 45, 239-244.
8. Darmaillacq, A.-S., Chichery, R., Shashar, N., & Dickel, L. (2006). Early familiarization overrides innate prey preference in newly-hatched Sepia officinalis cuttlefish. Animal Behaviour, 71, 511-514.
9. Foushée, R. D., & Lickliter, R. (2002). Early visual experience affects postnatal auditory responsiveness in Bobwhite Quail (Colinus virginianus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116(4), 369-380.
10. Gottlieb, G., Tomlinson, W. T., & Radell, P. L. (1989). Developmental intersensory interference: Premature visual experience suppresses auditory learning in ducklings. Infant Behavior and Development, 12, 1-12.
11. Kenny, P. A., & Turkewitz, G. (1986). Effects of unusually early visual stimulation on the development of homing behavior in the rat pup. Developmental Psychobiology, 19, 57-66.
12. Lickliter, R. (1995). Embryonic sensory experience and intersensory development in precocial birds. In: J. P. Lecanuet, N. A. Krasnegor, W. Fifer, & W. P. Somtherman (Eds.), Fetal development: A psychobiological perspective (pp. 281-294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaulm.
13. Lickliter, R. (2005). Prenatal sensory ecology and experience: Implications for perceptual and behavioral development in precocial birds. In: P. Slater, J. Rosenblatt, C. Snowden, T. Roper, H. J. Brockmann, & M. Naguib (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior, Vol. 35 (pp. 235-274). New York: Academic Press.
14. Lickliter, R., & Harshaw, C. (2010). Canalization and malleability Reconsidered: The Developmental Basis of Phenotypic Stability and Variability. In: K. Hood, C. Halpern, G. Greenberg, & R. Lerner (Eds.), The handbook of developmental systems, behavior and genetics. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
15. Meek, L.R., Schulz, K.M., & Keith, C.A. (2006). Effects of prenatal stress on sexual partner preference in mice. Physiology & Behavior, 89(2), 133-138.
16. Messenger, J. B. (1968). The visual attack of the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis Animal Behaviour, 16, 342-357.
17. Nixon, M., & Young, J. Z. (2003). The brain and lives of cephalopods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Paulij, W. P., Herman, P. M. J., Roozen, M. E. F., & Denucé, J. M. (1991). The influence of photoperiodicity on hatching of Sepia officinalis Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 665-678.
19. Richard, A., (1971). Contribution à l'étude expèrimentale de la croissance et de la maturation sexuelle de Sepia officinalis L. Mollusque cephalopode. Thèse d'état. Université de Lille-Faculté des Sciences.
20. Rowe, C. (2002). Sound improves visual discrimination learning in avian predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 1353-1357.
21. Rowe, C., & Guilford, T. (1996). Hidden colour aversions in domestic chicks triggered by pyrazine odours of insect warning displays. Nature, 383, 520-522.
22. VanderSal, N. D., & Hebets, E. A. (2007). Cross-modal effects on learning: A seismic stimulus improves color discrimination learning in a jumping spider. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 3689-3695.
23. Wells, M. J. (1958). Factors affecting reactions to Mysis by newly hatched Sepia Behaviour, 13, 96-111.