Evaluation of the medial longitudinal arch: A comparison between the dynamic plantar pressure measurement system and radiographic analysis

Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 241-245

  Yalçin, Nadir ^a   Esen, Erdinç ^a   Kanatli, Ulunay ^a   Yetkin, Haluk ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anthropometry; Dermatoglyphics; Foot radiography; Reference values

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; FOOT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; WALKING; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRESSURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; WALKING; WEIGHT-BEARING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649690876     PISSN: 1017995X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2233     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kanatli{dotless} U, Yetkin H, Cila E. Footprint and radiographic analysis of the feet. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:225-8.
2. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69:426-8.
3. Viladot A. Surgical treatment of the child's flatfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;(283):34-8.
4. Volpon JB. Footprint analysis during the growth period. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:83-5.
5. Forriol F, Pascual J. Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age. Foot Ankle 1990;11:101-4.
6. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:45-9.
7. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987;20:547-51.
8. Cobey JC, Sella E. Standardizing methods of measurement of foot shape by including the effects of subtalar rotation. Foot Ankle 1981;2:30-6.
9. Cavanagh PR, Morag E, Boulton AJ, Young MJ, Deffner KT, Pammer SE. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech 1997;30:243-50.
10. Simons GW. A standardized method for the radiographic evaluation of clubfeet. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;(135): 107-18.
11. Vanderwilde R, Staheli LT, Chew DE, Malagon V. Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70:407-15.
12. Gilmour JC, Burns Y. The measurement of the medial longitudinal arch in children. Foot Ankle Int 2001;22:493-8.
13. Rose GK. Flat feet in children. Br Med J 1990;301:1330-1.
14. Chen CH, Huang MH, Chen TW, Weng MC, Lee CL, Wang GJ. The correlation between selected measurements from footprint and radiograph of flatfoot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:235-40.
15. Hawes MR, Nachbauer W, Sovak D, Nigg BM. Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot Ankle 1992;13:22-6.
16. Igbigbi PS, Msamati BC. The footprint ratio as a predictor of pes planus: a study of indigenous Malawians. J Foot Ankle Surg 2002;41:394-7.
17. Echarri JJ, Forriol F. The development in footprint morphology in 1851 Congolese children from urban and rural areas, and the relationship between this and wearing shoes. J Pediatr Orthop B 2003;12:141-6.
18. El O, Akçali{dotless} O, Koşay C, Kaner B, Arslan Y, Sagol E, et al. Flexible flatfoot and related factors in primary school children: a report of a screening study. Rheumatol Int 2006; 26:1050-3.