Simulation semantics can revitalize the formalization of meaning:. Reply to comments on "Embodied language, best-fit analysis, and formal compositionality"

Physics of Life Reviews

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 421-423

  Feldman, Jerome ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL COMPUTER SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Best fit analysis; Compositionality; Simulation semantics

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649682812     PISSN: 15710645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2010.11.004     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Partee B. Compositionality, context, and cognition: Comment on "Embodied language, best fit analysis, and formal compositionality". Phys Life Rev 2010, 7(4):411-413. [this issue].
2. Feldman J. Embodied language, best fit analysis, and formal compositionality. Phys Life Rev 2010, 7(4):385-410. [this issue].
3. Hamm F., Kamp H., van Lambalgen M. There is no opposition between formal and cognitive semantics. Theor Linguist 2006, 32:1-40.
4. Steedman M. Embodied compositionality. Phys Life Rev 2010, 7(4):418-420. [this issue].
5. Feldman J. From molecule to metaphor: a neural theory of language 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Feldman J., Narayanan S. Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain Lang 2004, 89:385-392.
7. Narayanan S. KARMA: Knowledge-based action representations for metaphor and aspect. PhD dissertation. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley; 1997.
8. Narayanan S. Mind changes: A simulation semantics account of counterfactuals [submitted for publication]. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~snarayan/counterfactuals.pdf.
9. Allen J. Compositionality, language and intention: Commentary on "Embodied language, best fit analysis, and formal compositionality". Phys Life Rev 2010, 7(4):414-415. [this issue].
10. Sweetser E. Compositionality and blending. Cognitive linguistics: foundations, scope, and methodology 1999, 129-162. Mouton de Gruyer, New York. T. Janssen, G. Redeker (Eds.).
11. Steels L. Does embodiment need to be pushed even further? Comment on "Embodied language, best fit analysis, and formal compositionality". Phys Life Rev 2010, 7(4):416-417. [this issue].
12. Steels L. Grounding symbols through evolutionary language games. Simulating the evolution of language 2001, 221-226. Springer, New York. A. Cangelosi, D. Parisi (Eds.).
13. Bailey D, Feldman J, Narayanan S, Lakoff G. Modeling embodied lexical development. In: Proceedings of the 19th cognitive science society conference; 1997. p. 84-9.
14. Bindiganavale R, et al. Dynamically altering agent behaviors using natural language instructions. In: Autonomous agents; 2000. p. 293-300.
15. Bryant J. Constructional analysis [unpublished PhD dissertation]. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley; 2008.