Understanding preferences for disclosure of individual biomarker results among participants in a longitudinal birth cohort

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 736-740

  Wilson, Stephen E ^a,b   Baker, Erin R ^a   Leonard, Anthony C ^c   Eckman, Mark H ^a,c   Lanphear, Bruce P ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^d SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MOTHER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COHORT STUDIES; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MOTHERS; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649676120     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.036517     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. National Research Council. Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences, N.A. Press, 2006:201-233.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. DHHS U, ed, Atlanta, GA: National Center for Environmental Health, 2005.
3. Lanphear BP, Bearer CF. Biomarkers in paediatric research and practice. Arch Dis Child 2005;90:594-600.
4. Ahluwalia JS, Harris KJ, Catley D, et al. Sustained-release bupropion for smoking cessation in African Americans: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:468-474.
5. McClure JB. Are biomarkers a useful aid in smoking cessation? A review and analysis of the literature. Behav Med 2001;27:37-47.
6. United States, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. N.C.f.C.D.P.a.H.P.U.S.O.o.S.a, ed, Health. Rockville, MD: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General, 2006: xvii, 709.
7. Wakefield M, Banham D, McCaul K, et al. Effect of feedback regarding urinary cotinine and brief tailored advice on home smoking restrictions among low-income parents of children with asthma: a controlled trial. Prev Med 2002;34:58-65.
8. IARC Working Group. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking, in IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. W.H. Organization, ed, Lyon, France: IARC, 2004.
9. National Cancer Institute US. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke, etc., Monograph 10, August 1999. Washington D.C.: National Institutes of Health, 1999.
10. Canfield RL, Henderson CR Jr, Cory-Slechta DA, et al. Intellectual impairment in children with blood lead concentrations below 10 microg per decilitre. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1517-1526.
11. Dietrich KN, Ris MD, Succop PA, et al. Early exposure to lead and juvenile delinquency. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2001;23:511-518.
12. Lanphear BP, Winter NL, Apetz L, et al. A randomized trial of the effect of dust control on children's blood lead levels. Pediatrics 1996;98:35-40.
13. Needleman HL, McFarland C, Ness RB, et al. Bone lead levels in adjudicated delinquents. A case control study. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2002;24:711-717.
14. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance. Rockville, Maryland: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 1999.
15. Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants. JAMA 2005;294:737-740.
16. Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions. PLoS Med 2008;5:e91.
17. Ajaj A, Singh MP, Abdulla AJ. Should elderly patients be told they have cancer? Questionnaire survey of older people. BMJ 2001;323:1160.
18. Partridge AH, Hackett N, Blood E, et al. Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding offering clinical trial results to study participants. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:629-632.
19. Brody JG, Morello-Frosch R, Brown P, et al. Improving disclosure and consent: " is it safe?" : new ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1547-1554.
20. MacNeil SD, Fernandez CV. Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey. J Med Ethics 2007;33:549-553.
21. Yolton K, Khoury J, Xu Y, et al. Low-level prenatal exposure to nicotine and infant neurobehavior. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2009;31:356-363.
22. Geraghty SR, Khoury JC, Morrow AL, et al. Reporting individual test results of environmental chemicals in breastmilk: potential for premature weaning. Breastfeed Med 2008;3:207-213.
23. Wechsler W. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation, 1999.
24. Morello-Frosch R, Brody JG, Brown P, et al. Toxic ignorance and right-to-know in biomonitoring results communication: a survey of scientists and study participants. Environ Health 2009;8:6.
25. Schulz CJ, Riddle MP, Valdimirsdottir HB, et al. Impact on survivors of retinoblastoma when informed of study results on risk of second cancers. Med Pediatr Oncol 2003;41:36-43.
26. McBride CM, Halabi S, Bepler G, et al. Maximizing the motivational impact of feedback of lung cancer susceptibility on smokers' desire to quit. J Health Commun 2000;5:229-241.
27. Partridge AH, Burstein HJ, Gelman RS, et al. Do patients participating in clinical trials want to know study results? J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:491e2.
28. Partridge AH, Winer EP. Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA 2002;288:363e5.
29. Partridge AH, Wong JS, Knudsen K, et al. Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study. Lancet 2005;365:963-964.