Role of pseudopolymorphism on concentration dependent competitive adsorption at a liquid/solid interface

Chemical Communications

Volumn 46, Issue 48, 2010, Pages 9125-9127

  Lei, Shengbin ^a,b   Tahara, Kazukuni ^c   Tobe, Yoshito ^c   De Feyter, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LIQUID; PSEUDOPOLYMORPHISM; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; SOLID;

EID: 78649675861     PISSN: 13597345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c0cc03445b     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. J. A. Theobald N. S. Oxtoby M. A. Phillips N. R. Champness P. H. Beton Nature 2003 424 1029
2. A. Llanes-Pallas M. Matena T. Jung M. Prato M. Stöhr D. Bonifazi Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008 47 7726
3. C.-A. Palma M. Bonini A. Llanes-Pallas T. Breiner M. Prato D. Bonifazi P. Samorì Chem. Commun. 2008 5289
4. S. Lei M. Surin K. Tahara J. Adisoejoso R. Lazzaroni Y. Tobe S. De Feyter Nano Lett. 2008 8 2541
5. J. Adisoejoso K. Tahara S. Okuhata S. Lei Y. Tobe S. De Feyter Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009 48 7353
6. J. V. Barth G. Costantini K. Kern Nature 2005 437 671
7. F. Cicoira C. Santato F. Rosei Top. Curr. Chem. 2008 285 203
8. M. Lackinger W. M. Heckl Langmuir 2009 25 11307
9. Y. L. Yang C. Wang Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009 38 2576
10. L. J. Wan Acc. Chem. Res. 2006 39 334
11. J. A. A. W. Elemans S. Lei S. De Feyter Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009 48 7298
12. R. Otero W. Xu M. Lukas R. E. A. Kelly E. Lægsgaard I. Stensgaard J. Kjems L. N. Kantorovich F. Besenbacher Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008 47 9673
13. R. Madueno M. T. Räisänen C. Silien M. Buck Nature 2008 454 618
14. D. Bléger D. Kreher F. Mathevet A. J. Attias G. Schull A. Huard L. Douillard C. Fiorini-Debuischert F. Charra Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007 46 7404
15. L. Kampschulte T. L. Werblowsky R. S. K. Kishore M. Schmittel W. M. Heckl M. Lackinger J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008 130 8502
16. C. Palma J. Bjork M. Bonini M. S. Dyer A. Llanes-Pallas D. Bonifazi M. Persson P. Samorì J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009 131 13062
17. M. A. Castro S. M. Clarke A. Inaba R. K. Thomas T. Arnold J. Phys. Chem. B 2001 105 8577
18. M. Bonini L. Zalewski T. Breiner F. Dötz M. Kastler V. Schädler M. Surin R. Lazzaroni P. Samorì Small 2009 5 1521
19. 2), which is close to the experimental situation, indicates that only at the lowest concentration the adsorption changes the mole ratio in solution with an extent of 12% at maximum, while at high concentration the influence is negligible. For details see ESI
20. K. E. Plass A. L. Grzesiak A. J. Matzger Acc. Chem. Res. 2007 40 287
21. K. Kim K. E. Plass A. J. Matzger Langmuir 2005 21 647
22. S. Lei K. Tahara F. C. De Schryver M. Van der Auweraer Y. Tobe S. De Feyter Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008 47 2964
23. K. Tahara S. Furukawa H. Uji-i T. Uchino T. Ichikawa J. Zhang W. Mamdouh M. Sonoda F. C. De Schryver S. De Feyter Y. Tobe J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006 128 16613
24. 16. We attribute this to an experimental error, which reflects the limitation of the experimental setup to have absolute control over the concentration (small solution volume)
25. -7 M, the surface was still completely covered with a monolayer of molecules (Fig. S1-S5, ESI)
26. R. Zacharia H. Ulbricht T. Hertel Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2004 69 1555406
27. S. Yin C. Wang X. Qiu C. L. Bai Surf. Interface Anal. 2001 32 248
28. A. J. Gellman A. R. Paserba J. Phys. Chem. B 2002 106 13231