Technical-economical analysis of selected decentralized technologies for municipal wastewater treatment in the city of Rome

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1371-1378

  Gavasci, Renato ^a   Chiavola, Agostina ^b   Spizzirri, Massimo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c Acea Ato 2 SpA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Constructed wetlands; Deep shaft; Filtration; Membrane biological reactor; Sequencing batch reactor; UV disinfection

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; DEEP SHAFTS; MEMBRANE BIOLOGICAL REACTOR; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; UV-DISINFECTION;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BATCH REACTORS; BIOFILTRATION; DISINFECTION; EFFLUENTS; MAINTENANCE; MICROFILTRATION; TECHNOLOGY; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS; WETLANDS;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOREACTOR; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EFFLUENT; FILTRATION; FLOW PATTERN; MEMBRANE; URBAN REGION; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ARTICLE; CHLORINATION; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; DISINFECTION; ECONOMICS; EFFLUENT; FILTRATION; ITALY; MEMBRANE BIOLOGICAL REACTOR; REACTOR; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; ROME; URBANIZATION; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 78649670072     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.337     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Artan, N. & Orhon, D. 2005 Mechanism and Design of Sequencing Batch Reactors for Nutrient Removal. Scientific and Technical Report n. 19. IWA Publishing, UK.
2. Côte, P., Masini, M. & Mourato, D. 2004 Comparison of membrane options for water reuse and reclamation. Desalination 167, 1-11.
3. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency 1982 Technology Assessment of the Deep Shaft Biological Reactor. USA.
4. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency 1999 Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet-Chlorine Disinfection. USA.
5. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency 2000 Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet-Wetlands: Subsurface Flow. USA.
6. Gander, M., Jefferson, B. & Judd, S. 2000 Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 18, 119-130.
7. Kadlec, R. H. & Knight, R. L. 1996 Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
8. Melin, T., Jefferson, B., Bixio, B., Thoeye, C., De Wilde, W., de Koning, J., van der Graaf, J. & Wintgens, T. 2006 Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse. Desalination 187, 271-282.
9. Sirini, P. 2002 Ingegneria Sanitaria-Ambientale. Principi,Teorie e Metodi di Rappresentazione. McGraw-Hill, Italia.
10. Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L. & Stensel, H. D. 2003 Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. McGraw-Hill, USA.
11. Tomei, M. C. & Ramadori, R. 1999 ASCAM (Activated Sludge Computer Aided Modelling). Istituto di Ricerca sulle Acque (IRSA), Italy.
12. Wilderer, P., Irvine, R. L. & Goronszy, M. C. 2001 Sequencing Batch Reactor Technology. Scientific and Technical Report n. 10. IWA Publishing, UK.
13. Wisniewski, C. 2007 Membrane bioreactor for water reuse. Desalination 203, 15-19.
14. Yang, W., Cicek, N. & Ilg, J. 2006 State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J. Membr. Sci. 270, 201-211.